Microscopic Calculation of Fission Fragment Mass Distributions at Increasing. . .
283
References
1. N. Schunck, L.M. Robledo, Microscopic theory of nuclear fission: a review. Rep. Prog. Phys.
79(11), 116301 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/79/11/116301
2. M. Warda, J.L. Egido, Fission half-lives of superheavy nuclei in a microscopic approach. Phys.
Rev. C 86(1), 014322 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.86.014322
3. A. Staszczak, A. Baran, W. Nazarewicz, Spontaneous fission modes and lifetimes of superheavy elements in the nuclear density functional theory. Phys. Rev. C 87(2), 024320 (2013).
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.87.024320
4. J. Sadhukhan et al., Spontaneous fission lifetimes from the minimization of self-consistent
collective action. Phys. Rev. C 88(6), 064314 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.88.
064314
5. J. Zhao et al., Multidimensionally-constrained relativistic mean-field study of spontaneous
fission: coupling between shape and pairing degrees of freedom. Phys. Rev. C 93(4), 044315
(2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.93.044315
6. R. Rodríguez-Guzmán, L.M. Robledo, Microscopic description of fission in odd-mass uranium
and plutonium nuclei with the Gogny energy density functional. Eur. Phys. J. A 53(12), 245
(2017). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2017-12444-9
7. H. Goutte, P. Casoli, J.-F. Berger, Mass and kinetic energy distributions of fission fragments
using the time dependent generator coordinate method. Nucl. Phys. A 734, 217 (2004). https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2004.01.038
8. H. Goutte et al., Microscopic approach of fission dynamics applied to fragment kinetic energy
and mass distributions in 2 38U. Phys. Rev. C 71(2), 024316 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/
PhysRevC.71.024316
9. D. Regnier et al., FELIX-1.0: A finite element solver for the time dependent generator
coordinate method with the Gaussian overlap approximation. Comput. Phys. Commun. 200,
350 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2015.11.013
10. D. Regnier et al., Fission fragment charge and mass distributions in 239Pu(n,f) in the adiabatic
nuclear energy density functional theory. Phys. Rev. C 93(5), 054611 (2016). https://doi.org/
10.1103/PhysRevC.93.054611
11. A. Zdeb, A. Dobrowolski, M. Warda, Fission dynamics of Cf 252. Phys. Rev. C 95(5), 054608
(2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.95.054608
12. D. Regnier et al., FELIX-2.0: New version of the finite element solver for the time dependent generator coordinate method with the Gaussian overlap approximation. Comput. Phys.
Commun. 225, 180 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2017.12.007
13. J. Zhao et al., Microscopic self-consistent description of induced fission dynamics: finitetemperature effects. Phys. Rev. C 99(1), 014618 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.
99.014618
14. M.E. Gooden et al., Energy dependence of fission product yields from 235U, 238U and 239Pu
for incident neutron energies between 0.5 and 14.8 MeV. Nucl. Data Sheets 131, 319 (2016).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2015.12.006. Special Issue on Nuclear Reaction Data
15. N. Schunck, Energy Density Functional Methods for Atomic Nuclei. IOP Expanding Physics
(IOP Publishing, Bristol, 2019). OCLC: 1034572493
16. J.-P. Blaizot, G. Ripka. Quantum Theory of Finite Systems (The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1985).
ISBN: 978-0262022149
17. J.W. Negele et al., Dynamics of induced fission. Phys. Rev. C 17(3), 1098 (1978). https://doi.
org/10.1103/PhysRevC.17.1098
18. C. Simenel, A.S. Umar, Formation and dynamics of fission fragments. Phys. Rev. C 89(3),
031601(R) (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.89.031601
19. A. Bulgac et al., Induced fission of 2 40Pu within a real-time microscopic framework. Phys.
Rev. Lett. 116(12), 122504 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.122504