Restricted Spin-Ranges in the Oslo Method
199
Fig. 2 Calculated spin-parity distribution at E x = S n of the populated levels g pop compared to the
estimated intrinsic spin distribution g int at S n with the (Ref. [24]) spin-cut parameter. For the latter
equiparity is assumed and we also display the distribution at 2 MeV. More information in the text
(a)
(b)
Fig. 3 Upper panels: NLD (a) and γ SF (b) extracted with the Oslo Method (with an optional
correction r) from synthetic dataset. The populated spin distribution g pop was either chosen equal
to the intrinsic distribution g int , or narrower, according to the calculations for the (d,p) reaction. The
dashed lines for the γ SF denote the extrapolations assumed for the Oslo method. Lower panels:
Ratio to the known input
199
Fig. 2 Calculated spin-parity distribution at E x = S n of the populated levels g pop compared to the
estimated intrinsic spin distribution g int at S n with the (Ref. [24]) spin-cut parameter. For the latter
equiparity is assumed and we also display the distribution at 2 MeV. More information in the text
(a)
(b)
Fig. 3 Upper panels: NLD (a) and γ SF (b) extracted with the Oslo Method (with an optional
correction r) from synthetic dataset. The populated spin distribution g pop was either chosen equal
to the intrinsic distribution g int , or narrower, according to the calculations for the (d,p) reaction. The
dashed lines for the γ SF denote the extrapolations assumed for the Oslo method. Lower panels:
Ratio to the known input