71. A.V. Chankin, E. Delabie, G. Corrigan, C.F. Maggi, H. Meyer, JET Contributors, Possible
influence of near SOL plasma on the H-mode power threshold. Nucl. Mater. Energy 12,
273–277 (2017)
72. S. Wiesen et al., On the role of finite grid extent in SOLPS-ITER edge plasma simulations for
JET H-mode discharges with metallic wall. Nucl. Mater. Energy 17, 174–181 (2018)
73. A.E. Jaervinen et al., E Â B flux driven detachment bifurcation in the DIII-D tokamak. Phys.
Rev. Lett. 121(7), 75001 (2018)
74. A.E. Jaervinen et al., Impact of drifts on divertor power exhaust in DIII-D. Nucl. Mater. Energy
19, 230–238 (2019)
75. B. LaBombard et al., Cross-field plasma transport and main-chamber recycling in diverted
plasmas on Alcator C-Mod. Nucl. Fusion 40(12), 2041–2060 (2000)
76. L. Aho-Mantila et al., Assessment of SOLPS5.0 divertor solutions with drifts and currents
against L-mode experiments in ASDEX Upgrade and JET. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 59(3),
035003 (18pp) (2017)
77. S. Wiesen, W. Fundamenski, M. Wischmeier, M. Groth, S. Brezinsek, V. Naulin, Relevance of
collisionality in the transport model assumptions for divertor detachment multi-fluid modelling
on JET. J. Nucl. Mater. 415(1 SUPPL), S535–S539 (2011)
78. A.V. Chankin et al., Comparison between measured divertor parameters in ASDEX Upgrade
and SOLPS code solutions. J. Nucl. Mater. 363–365(1–3), 335–340 (2007)
79. O. Czarny, G. Huysmans, Bézier surfaces and finite elements for MHD simulations. J. Comput.
Phys. 227(16), 7423–7445 (2008)
80. V. Rozhansky, Drifts, currents, and radial electric field in the edge plasma with impact on
pedestal, divertor asymmetry and RMP consequences. Contrib. Plasma Phys. 54(4–6), 508–516
(2014)
81. A. Loarte et al., Progress on the application of ELM control schemes to ITER scenarios from the
non-active phase to DT operation. Nucl. Fusion 54(3), 033007 (18pp) (2014)
82. T.E. Evans et al., Suppression of large edge-localized modes in high-confinement DIII-D
plasmas with a stochastic magnetic boundary. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92(23), 235003 (2004)
83. W. Suttrop et al., First observation of edge localized modes mitigation with resonant and
nonresonant magnetic perturbations in ASDEX Upgrade. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106(22), 225004
(2011)
84. Y. Liang et al., Active control of type-I edge-localized modes with n ¼ 1 perturbation fields in
the JET tokamak. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98(26), 265004 (2007)
85. J.-W. Ahn et al., Effect of nonaxisymmetric magnetic perturbations on divertor heat and particle
flux profiles in National Spherical Torus Experiment. Phys. Plasmas 18(5), 56108 (2011)
86. B. Lloyd et al., Overview of physics results from MAST. Nucl. Fusion 51(9), 094013 (10pp)
(2011)
87. M.F. Heyn et al., Kinetic estimate of the shielding of resonant magnetic field perturbations by
the plasma in DIII-D. Nucl. Fusion 48(2), 024005 (2008)
88. H. Stoschus et al., Rotation dependence of a phase delay between plasma edge electron density
and temperature fields due to a fast rotating, resonant magnetic perturbation field. Phys. Plasmas
17(6), 60702 (2010)
89. I. Waters et al., Field aligned flows driven by neutral puffing at MAST. Nucl. Fusion 58(6),
066002 (12pp) (2018)
90. W. Suttrop, The physics of large and small edge localized modes. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion
42(5A), A1–A14 (2000)
91. R.A. Pitts et al., Physics basis for the first ITER tungsten divertor. Nucl. Mater. Energy 20(10),
100696 (2019)
92. D.P. Coster, R. Schneider, J. Neuhauser, B. Braams, D. Reiter, Theory and modelling of time
dependent phenomena in the plasma edge. Contrib. Plasma Phys. 36(2–3), 150–160 (1996)
93. T.D. Rognlien, M. Shimada, E Â B-drift, current, and kinetic effects on divertor plasma profiles
during ELMs. J. Nucl. Mater. 313–316(SUPPL), 1000–1004 (2003)
94. D.P. Coster, Whole device ELM simulations. J. Nucl. Mater. 390–391, 826–829 (2009)
226
8 Computational Modeling of the Edge Plasma Transport Phenomena
influence of near SOL plasma on the H-mode power threshold. Nucl. Mater. Energy 12,
273–277 (2017)
72. S. Wiesen et al., On the role of finite grid extent in SOLPS-ITER edge plasma simulations for
JET H-mode discharges with metallic wall. Nucl. Mater. Energy 17, 174–181 (2018)
73. A.E. Jaervinen et al., E Â B flux driven detachment bifurcation in the DIII-D tokamak. Phys.
Rev. Lett. 121(7), 75001 (2018)
74. A.E. Jaervinen et al., Impact of drifts on divertor power exhaust in DIII-D. Nucl. Mater. Energy
19, 230–238 (2019)
75. B. LaBombard et al., Cross-field plasma transport and main-chamber recycling in diverted
plasmas on Alcator C-Mod. Nucl. Fusion 40(12), 2041–2060 (2000)
76. L. Aho-Mantila et al., Assessment of SOLPS5.0 divertor solutions with drifts and currents
against L-mode experiments in ASDEX Upgrade and JET. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 59(3),
035003 (18pp) (2017)
77. S. Wiesen, W. Fundamenski, M. Wischmeier, M. Groth, S. Brezinsek, V. Naulin, Relevance of
collisionality in the transport model assumptions for divertor detachment multi-fluid modelling
on JET. J. Nucl. Mater. 415(1 SUPPL), S535–S539 (2011)
78. A.V. Chankin et al., Comparison between measured divertor parameters in ASDEX Upgrade
and SOLPS code solutions. J. Nucl. Mater. 363–365(1–3), 335–340 (2007)
79. O. Czarny, G. Huysmans, Bézier surfaces and finite elements for MHD simulations. J. Comput.
Phys. 227(16), 7423–7445 (2008)
80. V. Rozhansky, Drifts, currents, and radial electric field in the edge plasma with impact on
pedestal, divertor asymmetry and RMP consequences. Contrib. Plasma Phys. 54(4–6), 508–516
(2014)
81. A. Loarte et al., Progress on the application of ELM control schemes to ITER scenarios from the
non-active phase to DT operation. Nucl. Fusion 54(3), 033007 (18pp) (2014)
82. T.E. Evans et al., Suppression of large edge-localized modes in high-confinement DIII-D
plasmas with a stochastic magnetic boundary. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92(23), 235003 (2004)
83. W. Suttrop et al., First observation of edge localized modes mitigation with resonant and
nonresonant magnetic perturbations in ASDEX Upgrade. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106(22), 225004
(2011)
84. Y. Liang et al., Active control of type-I edge-localized modes with n ¼ 1 perturbation fields in
the JET tokamak. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98(26), 265004 (2007)
85. J.-W. Ahn et al., Effect of nonaxisymmetric magnetic perturbations on divertor heat and particle
flux profiles in National Spherical Torus Experiment. Phys. Plasmas 18(5), 56108 (2011)
86. B. Lloyd et al., Overview of physics results from MAST. Nucl. Fusion 51(9), 094013 (10pp)
(2011)
87. M.F. Heyn et al., Kinetic estimate of the shielding of resonant magnetic field perturbations by
the plasma in DIII-D. Nucl. Fusion 48(2), 024005 (2008)
88. H. Stoschus et al., Rotation dependence of a phase delay between plasma edge electron density
and temperature fields due to a fast rotating, resonant magnetic perturbation field. Phys. Plasmas
17(6), 60702 (2010)
89. I. Waters et al., Field aligned flows driven by neutral puffing at MAST. Nucl. Fusion 58(6),
066002 (12pp) (2018)
90. W. Suttrop, The physics of large and small edge localized modes. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion
42(5A), A1–A14 (2000)
91. R.A. Pitts et al., Physics basis for the first ITER tungsten divertor. Nucl. Mater. Energy 20(10),
100696 (2019)
92. D.P. Coster, R. Schneider, J. Neuhauser, B. Braams, D. Reiter, Theory and modelling of time
dependent phenomena in the plasma edge. Contrib. Plasma Phys. 36(2–3), 150–160 (1996)
93. T.D. Rognlien, M. Shimada, E Â B-drift, current, and kinetic effects on divertor plasma profiles
during ELMs. J. Nucl. Mater. 313–316(SUPPL), 1000–1004 (2003)
94. D.P. Coster, Whole device ELM simulations. J. Nucl. Mater. 390–391, 826–829 (2009)
226
8 Computational Modeling of the Edge Plasma Transport Phenomena