86 Rocío Alvarez-Tinoco et al.
Energy Technologies Institute (ETI) (2015). Options Choices Actions- UK scenarios for a
low carbon energy system. Available at: www.eti.co.uk/insights/options- choices-actionsuk-scenarios- for-a- low-carbon- energy-system/ [accessed 13 November 2017].
First stakeholders’ consultation workshop (2016, 21 October 2016). Transitions Pathways and Risks Analysis for Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies.
TRANSrisk project. EC Horizon 2020: ID 642260. London.
Focus group: nuclear power (2016, 1 July). Transitions pathways and risk analysis for
climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies. TRANSrisk Project. EC Horizon
2020: ID 642260. SPRU- University of Sussex, Falmer.
Gillard, R., Lock, K. (2017). Blowing policy bubbles: rethinking emissions targets and
low- carbon energy policies in the UK. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning
19(6), 638–653.
Grünewald, P., Cockerill, T., Contestabile, M., Pearson, P. (2011). The role of large
scale storage in a GB low carbon energy future: Issues and policy challenges. Energy
Policy 39(9), 4807–4815.
Hanger, S., van Vliet, O., Bachner, G., Kontchristopoulos, Y., Lieu, J., Alvarez- Tinoco,
R., Carlsen, H., Suljada, T. (2016). Transitions Pathways and Risks Analysis for Climate
Change Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies. D5.1 Review of key uncertainties and risks for
climate policy. TRANSrisk Project. EC Horizon 2020: ID 642260. Available at: http://
transrisk- project.eu/sites/default/files/Documents/D5.1%20Review%20of%20key%20
uncertainties%20and%20risks%20for%20climate%20policy.pdf [accessed 13 December 2017].
Harris, G., Heptonstall, P., Gross, R., Handley, D. (2013). Cost estimates for nuclear
power in the UK. Energy Policy 62, 431–442.
Hattam, C., Hooper, T., Papathanasopoulou, E. (2017). A well- being framework for impact
evaluation: The case of the UK offshore wind industry. Marine Policy 78, 122–131.
Higgins, P., Foley, A. (2014). The evolution of offshore wind power in the United
Kingdom. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 37, 599–612.
HM Government (2008). Climate Change Act 2008: Chapter 27. The Stationery Office, UK.
HM Government (2013). The UK’s Nuclear Future. Available at: https://assets.publishing.
service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/168048/
bis- 13-627-nuclear- industrial-strategy- the-uks- nuclear-future.pdf [accessed 24August
2018].
HM Government (2017). Clean Growth Strategy: Leading the way to a low carbon future.
Available at: www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/
651916/BEIS_The_Clean_Growth_online_12.10.17.pdf [accessed 18 October 2017].
Hooper, T., Beaumont, N., Hattam, C. (2017). The implications of energy systems for
ecosystem services: A detailed case study of offshore wind. Renewable and Sustainable
Energy Reviews 70, 230–241.
Jay, B.M., Howard, D., Hughes, N., Withaker, J., Anandarajah, G. (2014). Modelling
Socio- Environmental Sensitivities: How Public Responses to Low Carbon Energy
Technologies Could Shape the UK Energy System. The Scientific World Journal Volume
2014, Article ID 605196.
Johnstone, P., Stirling, A. (2015). Comparing Nuclear Power Trajectories in Germany
and the UK: From ‘Regimes’ to ‘Democracies’ in Sociotechnical Transitions and Discontinuities. SPRU Working Paper Series (SWPS) 2015–18, 1–86.
Kepplinger, H.M., Lemke, R. (2016). Instrumentalizing Fukushima: Comparing Media
Coverage of Fukushima in Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and Switzerland.
Political Communication 33(3), 351–373.
Energy Technologies Institute (ETI) (2015). Options Choices Actions- UK scenarios for a
low carbon energy system. Available at: www.eti.co.uk/insights/options- choices-actionsuk-scenarios- for-a- low-carbon- energy-system/ [accessed 13 November 2017].
First stakeholders’ consultation workshop (2016, 21 October 2016). Transitions Pathways and Risks Analysis for Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies.
TRANSrisk project. EC Horizon 2020: ID 642260. London.
Focus group: nuclear power (2016, 1 July). Transitions pathways and risk analysis for
climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies. TRANSrisk Project. EC Horizon
2020: ID 642260. SPRU- University of Sussex, Falmer.
Gillard, R., Lock, K. (2017). Blowing policy bubbles: rethinking emissions targets and
low- carbon energy policies in the UK. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning
19(6), 638–653.
Grünewald, P., Cockerill, T., Contestabile, M., Pearson, P. (2011). The role of large
scale storage in a GB low carbon energy future: Issues and policy challenges. Energy
Policy 39(9), 4807–4815.
Hanger, S., van Vliet, O., Bachner, G., Kontchristopoulos, Y., Lieu, J., Alvarez- Tinoco,
R., Carlsen, H., Suljada, T. (2016). Transitions Pathways and Risks Analysis for Climate
Change Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies. D5.1 Review of key uncertainties and risks for
climate policy. TRANSrisk Project. EC Horizon 2020: ID 642260. Available at: http://
transrisk- project.eu/sites/default/files/Documents/D5.1%20Review%20of%20key%20
uncertainties%20and%20risks%20for%20climate%20policy.pdf [accessed 13 December 2017].
Harris, G., Heptonstall, P., Gross, R., Handley, D. (2013). Cost estimates for nuclear
power in the UK. Energy Policy 62, 431–442.
Hattam, C., Hooper, T., Papathanasopoulou, E. (2017). A well- being framework for impact
evaluation: The case of the UK offshore wind industry. Marine Policy 78, 122–131.
Higgins, P., Foley, A. (2014). The evolution of offshore wind power in the United
Kingdom. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 37, 599–612.
HM Government (2008). Climate Change Act 2008: Chapter 27. The Stationery Office, UK.
HM Government (2013). The UK’s Nuclear Future. Available at: https://assets.publishing.
service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/168048/
bis- 13-627-nuclear- industrial-strategy- the-uks- nuclear-future.pdf [accessed 24August
2018].
HM Government (2017). Clean Growth Strategy: Leading the way to a low carbon future.
Available at: www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/
651916/BEIS_The_Clean_Growth_online_12.10.17.pdf [accessed 18 October 2017].
Hooper, T., Beaumont, N., Hattam, C. (2017). The implications of energy systems for
ecosystem services: A detailed case study of offshore wind. Renewable and Sustainable
Energy Reviews 70, 230–241.
Jay, B.M., Howard, D., Hughes, N., Withaker, J., Anandarajah, G. (2014). Modelling
Socio- Environmental Sensitivities: How Public Responses to Low Carbon Energy
Technologies Could Shape the UK Energy System. The Scientific World Journal Volume
2014, Article ID 605196.
Johnstone, P., Stirling, A. (2015). Comparing Nuclear Power Trajectories in Germany
and the UK: From ‘Regimes’ to ‘Democracies’ in Sociotechnical Transitions and Discontinuities. SPRU Working Paper Series (SWPS) 2015–18, 1–86.
Kepplinger, H.M., Lemke, R. (2016). Instrumentalizing Fukushima: Comparing Media
Coverage of Fukushima in Germany, France, the United Kingdom, and Switzerland.
Political Communication 33(3), 351–373.