Simulations of Machining Processes at Small …
253
Fig. 11 Comparison of chip morphology for CM and UAM for V 0 = 1.0 for moments ➀ (a), ➁
(b) and ➂ (c) in Figs. 9 and 10
Acknowledgements Funding from the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (UK)
through grant EP/K028316/1 and Department of Science and Technology (India), project MAST,
is gratefully acknowledged.
References
1. Kumar, M.N., Subbu, S.K., Krishna, P.V., Venugopal, A.: Vibration assisted conventional and
advanced machining: a review. Procedia Eng. 97, 1577–1586 (2014)
2. Muhammad, R., Hussain, M.S., Maurotto, A., Siemers, C., Roy, A., Silberschmidt, V.: Analysis
of a free machining α + β titanium alloy using conventional and ultrasonically assisted turning.
J. Mater. Process. Technol. 214(4), 906–915 (2014)
253
Fig. 11 Comparison of chip morphology for CM and UAM for V 0 = 1.0 for moments ➀ (a), ➁
(b) and ➂ (c) in Figs. 9 and 10
Acknowledgements Funding from the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (UK)
through grant EP/K028316/1 and Department of Science and Technology (India), project MAST,
is gratefully acknowledged.
References
1. Kumar, M.N., Subbu, S.K., Krishna, P.V., Venugopal, A.: Vibration assisted conventional and
advanced machining: a review. Procedia Eng. 97, 1577–1586 (2014)
2. Muhammad, R., Hussain, M.S., Maurotto, A., Siemers, C., Roy, A., Silberschmidt, V.: Analysis
of a free machining α + β titanium alloy using conventional and ultrasonically assisted turning.
J. Mater. Process. Technol. 214(4), 906–915 (2014)