330
Electrochemical Supercapacitors for Energy Storage and Delivery
option will be the integrated starter alternator (ISA), an electrical part that
can replace both the starter motor and the alternator.
The implementation of an ISA can provide greater generating ability and
allow start–stop operation of the engine. The ISA can start an ICE quickly
and easily, so when the vehicle must stop for an extended period, the ICE
can be turned off rather than unnecessarily burning fuel. An ES bank in this
configuration provides the power for engine cranking and is kept charged
by a battery. The battery does not provide the power for starting the ICE; it
is used only for charging the ES. In this way, battery life can be improved
significantly.
8.10 Renewable and Off-Peak Energy Storage
Renewable and off-peak power supplies that derive their energy from intermittent sources such as wind or solar radiation must store energy to ensure
that it is available at all times. Under such circumstances, ESs have a number
of advantages over the common battery. For example, if a photovoltaic (PV)
device generates power and stores it in a battery, the limited cycle life of the
battery means replacement every 3 to 7 years [23]. Conversely, ESs can withstand large numbers of charge and discharge cycles without suffering significant losses in performance and thus need to be replaced every 20 years,
which is also the lifetime of a PV panel [24]. Life-cycle costs are therefore
reduced by the elimination of frequent maintenance.
Energy efficiency is always of primary concern in renewable power generation and ESs demonstrate higher charging efficiencies than batteries. A
lead–acid battery, for example, can lose up to 30% of its energy during charging. ESs, on the other hand, may only lose 10% [24]. The ability to operate
efficiently over a wide range of temperatures is also an advantage of ESs.
Remote stations may be located in cold climates and if batteries are used for
energy storage, the temperature must be maintained near room temperature
by auxiliary systems, representing additional cost and energy consumption.
The major shortcoming of ES technology for application in intermittent renewable energy sources is its limited energy density. This results in
excessive capital cost (equal to battery cost) to maintain energy storage. For
this reason, ESs are rarely chosen for such applications. A study by Telstra
Research Laboratories [25] emphasized the reduced life-cycle costs of network termination units powered by PV panels and ESs, and concluded that
while present prices exclude their use, the capital costs can be expected to
decrease significantly in the coming years [25].
Electrochemical Supercapacitors for Energy Storage and Delivery
option will be the integrated starter alternator (ISA), an electrical part that
can replace both the starter motor and the alternator.
The implementation of an ISA can provide greater generating ability and
allow start–stop operation of the engine. The ISA can start an ICE quickly
and easily, so when the vehicle must stop for an extended period, the ICE
can be turned off rather than unnecessarily burning fuel. An ES bank in this
configuration provides the power for engine cranking and is kept charged
by a battery. The battery does not provide the power for starting the ICE; it
is used only for charging the ES. In this way, battery life can be improved
significantly.
8.10 Renewable and Off-Peak Energy Storage
Renewable and off-peak power supplies that derive their energy from intermittent sources such as wind or solar radiation must store energy to ensure
that it is available at all times. Under such circumstances, ESs have a number
of advantages over the common battery. For example, if a photovoltaic (PV)
device generates power and stores it in a battery, the limited cycle life of the
battery means replacement every 3 to 7 years [23]. Conversely, ESs can withstand large numbers of charge and discharge cycles without suffering significant losses in performance and thus need to be replaced every 20 years,
which is also the lifetime of a PV panel [24]. Life-cycle costs are therefore
reduced by the elimination of frequent maintenance.
Energy efficiency is always of primary concern in renewable power generation and ESs demonstrate higher charging efficiencies than batteries. A
lead–acid battery, for example, can lose up to 30% of its energy during charging. ESs, on the other hand, may only lose 10% [24]. The ability to operate
efficiently over a wide range of temperatures is also an advantage of ESs.
Remote stations may be located in cold climates and if batteries are used for
energy storage, the temperature must be maintained near room temperature
by auxiliary systems, representing additional cost and energy consumption.
The major shortcoming of ES technology for application in intermittent renewable energy sources is its limited energy density. This results in
excessive capital cost (equal to battery cost) to maintain energy storage. For
this reason, ESs are rarely chosen for such applications. A study by Telstra
Research Laboratories [25] emphasized the reduced life-cycle costs of network termination units powered by PV panels and ESs, and concluded that
while present prices exclude their use, the capital costs can be expected to
decrease significantly in the coming years [25].