46
S. J. Mukhopadhyay et al.
Fig. 6 Noise measure versus
frequency graph for 94 GHz
Si IMPATT source [23]
Fig. 7 Noise measure versus
frequency graph for 94 GHz
Si IMPATT source [24]
chapter); as a result of that noise, measures of 3C-SiC IMPATTs are slightly higher
than those of diamond IMPATTs at all operating frequencies.
The experimentally measured noise measure of 94 GHz Si IMPATT source is
around 35 dB [25], which is very close to the noise measure value obtained from
the small-signal noise simulation. This close agreement of simulation obtained data
with the experimental result validates the simulation methodology under concern.
However, further validation of it is restricted as a result of the unavailability of the
reported experimental data.
S. J. Mukhopadhyay et al.
Fig. 6 Noise measure versus
frequency graph for 94 GHz
Si IMPATT source [23]
Fig. 7 Noise measure versus
frequency graph for 94 GHz
Si IMPATT source [24]
chapter); as a result of that noise, measures of 3C-SiC IMPATTs are slightly higher
than those of diamond IMPATTs at all operating frequencies.
The experimentally measured noise measure of 94 GHz Si IMPATT source is
around 35 dB [25], which is very close to the noise measure value obtained from
the small-signal noise simulation. This close agreement of simulation obtained data
with the experimental result validates the simulation methodology under concern.
However, further validation of it is restricted as a result of the unavailability of the
reported experimental data.