100
H. K. Palo
the web-based threat, security vulnerabilities, etc. pose a challenge for the effective
implementation of SIoT. To protect the systems for remote attacks, it is advisable to
use secret keys to provide hardware protection. It also requires development time,
extensive security expertise, and costs to configure and the desired provisioning for
each device. With industries developing millions of connected devices each year,
the scalability of the device architecture is another major issue in this field. The
producers can provide and configure high-volume orders as ease. Thus, the low or
mid-sized deployments have been mostly occurring in small companies with low
performing options. The SIoT adoption and innovation have the issues concerned
with the data interoperability. The cross-domain interoperability is likely to remain
the core element for a promising future generation IoT platform that is going to be
coined as the Internet of Everything. The absence of adequate interoperability leading
to the integration of heterogeneous IoT devices into platforms results in the technological and economical drawbacks. Further, the problems associated with the design
of applications of exploiting data collected from multiple IoT domains, hindrances of
IoT enabled technology explorations at a large-scale, increase in the cost of implementation and provisioning of services and reluctance in adopting advanced IoT
technologies hamper the overall user satisfaction.
References
1. Van Kranenburg, R., Bassi, A.: IoT challenges. Commun. Mob. Comput. 1(9), 1–5 (2012)
2. Atzori, L., Iera, A., Morabito, G.: The internet of things: a survey. Comput. Net. 54(15),
2787–2805 (2010)
3. Evans, D.: The internet of things: how the next evolution of the internet is changing everything.
CISCO White Pap. 1, 1–11 (2011)
4. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The semantic web. SciAm 284(5), 28–37 (2001)
5. Berners-Lee, T.: Linked data. Int. J. Semant. Web. Inf. Syst. 4(2) (2006)
6. McIlraith, A., Son, T.C., Zeng, H.: Semantic web services. IEEE Intell. Syst. 16, 46–53 (2001)
7. Greenough, J.: The US smart home market has been struggling-here’s how and why the market
smart-home-marketreport-adoption-forecasts-top-products-and-the-cost-and-fragmentationproblems-that-could-hindergrowth-2015-9 (2016)
8. Al-Osta, M., Ahmed, B., Abdelouahed, G.: A lightweight semantic web-based approach for
data annotation on IoT gateways. Proc. Comp. Sci. 113, 186–193 (2017)
9. Zhang, H., Li, Y.F., Tan, H.B.K.: Measuring design complexity of semantic web ontologies. J.
Syst. Softw. 83(5), 803–814 (2010)
10. Amarilli, F., Amigoni, F., Fugini, M.G., Zarri, G.P.: A semantic-rich approach to IoT using
the generalized world entities paradigm. In: Managing the Web of Things. Morgan Kaufmann,
pp. 105–147 (2017)
11. Gomes, P., et al.: A semantic-based discovery service for the internet of things. J. Internet Serv.
Appl. 10(10), 2–14 (2019)
12. INFSO D.4 Networked Enterprise and RFID INFSO G.2 Micro and Nanosystems. In Cooperation with the Working Group RFID of the ETP EPOSS, Internet of Things in 2020,
Roadmap for the Future, Version 1.1, 27 May 2008
13. Toma, I., Simperl, E., Hench, G.: A joint roadmap for semantic technologies and the internet
of things. In: Proceedings of the Third STI Road Mapping Workshop, Crete, Greece (2009)
H. K. Palo
the web-based threat, security vulnerabilities, etc. pose a challenge for the effective
implementation of SIoT. To protect the systems for remote attacks, it is advisable to
use secret keys to provide hardware protection. It also requires development time,
extensive security expertise, and costs to configure and the desired provisioning for
each device. With industries developing millions of connected devices each year,
the scalability of the device architecture is another major issue in this field. The
producers can provide and configure high-volume orders as ease. Thus, the low or
mid-sized deployments have been mostly occurring in small companies with low
performing options. The SIoT adoption and innovation have the issues concerned
with the data interoperability. The cross-domain interoperability is likely to remain
the core element for a promising future generation IoT platform that is going to be
coined as the Internet of Everything. The absence of adequate interoperability leading
to the integration of heterogeneous IoT devices into platforms results in the technological and economical drawbacks. Further, the problems associated with the design
of applications of exploiting data collected from multiple IoT domains, hindrances of
IoT enabled technology explorations at a large-scale, increase in the cost of implementation and provisioning of services and reluctance in adopting advanced IoT
technologies hamper the overall user satisfaction.
References
1. Van Kranenburg, R., Bassi, A.: IoT challenges. Commun. Mob. Comput. 1(9), 1–5 (2012)
2. Atzori, L., Iera, A., Morabito, G.: The internet of things: a survey. Comput. Net. 54(15),
2787–2805 (2010)
3. Evans, D.: The internet of things: how the next evolution of the internet is changing everything.
CISCO White Pap. 1, 1–11 (2011)
4. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The semantic web. SciAm 284(5), 28–37 (2001)
5. Berners-Lee, T.: Linked data. Int. J. Semant. Web. Inf. Syst. 4(2) (2006)
6. McIlraith, A., Son, T.C., Zeng, H.: Semantic web services. IEEE Intell. Syst. 16, 46–53 (2001)
7. Greenough, J.: The US smart home market has been struggling-here’s how and why the market
smart-home-marketreport-adoption-forecasts-top-products-and-the-cost-and-fragmentationproblems-that-could-hindergrowth-2015-9 (2016)
8. Al-Osta, M., Ahmed, B., Abdelouahed, G.: A lightweight semantic web-based approach for
data annotation on IoT gateways. Proc. Comp. Sci. 113, 186–193 (2017)
9. Zhang, H., Li, Y.F., Tan, H.B.K.: Measuring design complexity of semantic web ontologies. J.
Syst. Softw. 83(5), 803–814 (2010)
10. Amarilli, F., Amigoni, F., Fugini, M.G., Zarri, G.P.: A semantic-rich approach to IoT using
the generalized world entities paradigm. In: Managing the Web of Things. Morgan Kaufmann,
pp. 105–147 (2017)
11. Gomes, P., et al.: A semantic-based discovery service for the internet of things. J. Internet Serv.
Appl. 10(10), 2–14 (2019)
12. INFSO D.4 Networked Enterprise and RFID INFSO G.2 Micro and Nanosystems. In Cooperation with the Working Group RFID of the ETP EPOSS, Internet of Things in 2020,
Roadmap for the Future, Version 1.1, 27 May 2008
13. Toma, I., Simperl, E., Hench, G.: A joint roadmap for semantic technologies and the internet
of things. In: Proceedings of the Third STI Road Mapping Workshop, Crete, Greece (2009)