Crigler J, Eiteman MA, Altman E (2020) Characterization of the furfural and
5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) metabolic pathway in the novel isolate Pseudomonas putida
ALS1267. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 190(3):918–930
Cuevas M, García JF, Sánchez S (2014) Enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated almond-tree
prunings for sugar production. Carbohydr Polym 99:791–799
Da Silva TL, Santo R, Reis A, Passarinho PC (2017) Effect of furfural on Saccharomyces
carlsbergensis growth, physiology and ethanol production. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 182
(2):708–720
De Bari I, Nanna F, Braccio G (2007) SO2-catalyzed steam fractionation of aspen chips for
bioethanol production: optimization of the catalyst impregnation. Industr Eng Chem Res 46
(23):7711–7720
De Klerk C, Fosso-Kankeu E, Du Plessis L, Marx S (2018) Assessment of the viability of
Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to synergetic inhibition during bioethanol production.
Curr Sci 115(6):00113891
Dechman J, Foody B (2020) Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass with sulfur dioxide and/or
sulfurous acid. Google Patents
Deshavath NN, Mohan M, Veeranki VD, Goud VV, Pinnamaneni SR, Benarjee T (2017) Dilute
acid pretreatment of sorghum biomass to maximize the hemicellulose hydrolysis with minimized levels of fermentative inhibitors for bioethanol production. 3 Biotech 7(2):139
Dey SK, Dey S, Das A (2013) Comminution features in an impact hammer mill. Powder Technol
235:914–920
dos Santos AC, Ximenes E, Kim Y, Ladisch MR (2019) Lignin–enzyme interactions in the
hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Trends Biotechnol 37(5):518–531
Duque SH, Cardona CA, Moncada J (2015) Techno-economic and environmental analysis of
ethanol production from 10 agroindustrial residues in Colombia. Energy Fuel 29(2):775–783
Eriksson T, Börjesson J, Tjerneld F (2002) Mechanism of surfactant effect in enzymatic hydrolysis
of lignocellulose. Enzyme Microb Technol 31(3):353–364
Ezeji T, Qureshi N, Blaschek HP (2007) Butanol production from agricultural residues: impact of
degradation products on Clostridium beijerinckii growth and butanol fermentation. Biotechnol
Bioeng 97(6):1460–1469
Favaro L, Basaglia M, Trento A, Van Rensburg E, García-Aparicio M, Van Zyl WH, Casella S
(2013) Exploring grape marc as trove for new thermotolerant and inhibitor-tolerant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for second-generation bioethanol production. Biotechnol Biofuels 6
(1):1–14
Favaro L, Jansen T, van Zyl WH (2019) Exploring industrial and natural Saccharomyces cerevisiae
strains for the bio-based economy from biomass: the case of bioethanol. Crit Rev Biotechnol 39
(6):800–816
Fletcher E, Gao K, Mercurio K, Ali M, Baetz K (2019) Yeast chemogenomic screen identifies
distinct metabolic pathways required to tolerate exposure to phenolic fermentation inhibitors
ferulic acid, 4-hydroxybenzoic acid and coniferyl aldehyde. Metab Eng 52:98–109
Fosso-Kankeu E, Marx S, Meyer A (2015) Simulated inhibitory effects of typical byproducts of
biomass pretreatment process on the viability of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and bioethanol
production yield. Afr J Biotechnol 14(30):2383–2394
Fu S, Hu J, Liu H (2014) Inhibitory effects of biomass degradation products on ethanol fermentation
and a strategy to overcome them. BioResources 9(3):4323–4335
George A, Brandt A, Tran K, Zahari SMNS, Klein-Marcuschamer D, Sun N, Sathitsuksanoh N,
Shi J, Stavila V, Parthasarathi R (2015) Design of low-cost ionic liquids for lignocellulosic
biomass pretreatment. Green Chem 17(3):1728–1734
Greetham D, Zaky AS, Du C (2019) Exploring the tolerance of marine yeast to inhibitory
compounds for improving bioethanol production. Sustain Energy Fuels 3(6):1545–1553
Han J, Luterbacher JS, Alonso DM, Dumesic JA, Maravelias CT (2015) A lignocellulosic ethanol
strategy via nonenzymatic sugar production: Process synthesis and analysis. Bioresour Technol
182:258–266
148
FaizaKausar et al.
5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) metabolic pathway in the novel isolate Pseudomonas putida
ALS1267. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 190(3):918–930
Cuevas M, García JF, Sánchez S (2014) Enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated almond-tree
prunings for sugar production. Carbohydr Polym 99:791–799
Da Silva TL, Santo R, Reis A, Passarinho PC (2017) Effect of furfural on Saccharomyces
carlsbergensis growth, physiology and ethanol production. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 182
(2):708–720
De Bari I, Nanna F, Braccio G (2007) SO2-catalyzed steam fractionation of aspen chips for
bioethanol production: optimization of the catalyst impregnation. Industr Eng Chem Res 46
(23):7711–7720
De Klerk C, Fosso-Kankeu E, Du Plessis L, Marx S (2018) Assessment of the viability of
Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to synergetic inhibition during bioethanol production.
Curr Sci 115(6):00113891
Dechman J, Foody B (2020) Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass with sulfur dioxide and/or
sulfurous acid. Google Patents
Deshavath NN, Mohan M, Veeranki VD, Goud VV, Pinnamaneni SR, Benarjee T (2017) Dilute
acid pretreatment of sorghum biomass to maximize the hemicellulose hydrolysis with minimized levels of fermentative inhibitors for bioethanol production. 3 Biotech 7(2):139
Dey SK, Dey S, Das A (2013) Comminution features in an impact hammer mill. Powder Technol
235:914–920
dos Santos AC, Ximenes E, Kim Y, Ladisch MR (2019) Lignin–enzyme interactions in the
hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Trends Biotechnol 37(5):518–531
Duque SH, Cardona CA, Moncada J (2015) Techno-economic and environmental analysis of
ethanol production from 10 agroindustrial residues in Colombia. Energy Fuel 29(2):775–783
Eriksson T, Börjesson J, Tjerneld F (2002) Mechanism of surfactant effect in enzymatic hydrolysis
of lignocellulose. Enzyme Microb Technol 31(3):353–364
Ezeji T, Qureshi N, Blaschek HP (2007) Butanol production from agricultural residues: impact of
degradation products on Clostridium beijerinckii growth and butanol fermentation. Biotechnol
Bioeng 97(6):1460–1469
Favaro L, Basaglia M, Trento A, Van Rensburg E, García-Aparicio M, Van Zyl WH, Casella S
(2013) Exploring grape marc as trove for new thermotolerant and inhibitor-tolerant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for second-generation bioethanol production. Biotechnol Biofuels 6
(1):1–14
Favaro L, Jansen T, van Zyl WH (2019) Exploring industrial and natural Saccharomyces cerevisiae
strains for the bio-based economy from biomass: the case of bioethanol. Crit Rev Biotechnol 39
(6):800–816
Fletcher E, Gao K, Mercurio K, Ali M, Baetz K (2019) Yeast chemogenomic screen identifies
distinct metabolic pathways required to tolerate exposure to phenolic fermentation inhibitors
ferulic acid, 4-hydroxybenzoic acid and coniferyl aldehyde. Metab Eng 52:98–109
Fosso-Kankeu E, Marx S, Meyer A (2015) Simulated inhibitory effects of typical byproducts of
biomass pretreatment process on the viability of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and bioethanol
production yield. Afr J Biotechnol 14(30):2383–2394
Fu S, Hu J, Liu H (2014) Inhibitory effects of biomass degradation products on ethanol fermentation
and a strategy to overcome them. BioResources 9(3):4323–4335
George A, Brandt A, Tran K, Zahari SMNS, Klein-Marcuschamer D, Sun N, Sathitsuksanoh N,
Shi J, Stavila V, Parthasarathi R (2015) Design of low-cost ionic liquids for lignocellulosic
biomass pretreatment. Green Chem 17(3):1728–1734
Greetham D, Zaky AS, Du C (2019) Exploring the tolerance of marine yeast to inhibitory
compounds for improving bioethanol production. Sustain Energy Fuels 3(6):1545–1553
Han J, Luterbacher JS, Alonso DM, Dumesic JA, Maravelias CT (2015) A lignocellulosic ethanol
strategy via nonenzymatic sugar production: Process synthesis and analysis. Bioresour Technol
182:258–266
148
FaizaKausar et al.