11 Application of Accelerators and Storage Rings
791
100. A. Garonna, U. Amaldi, R. Bonomi, D. Campo, A. Degiovanni, M. Garlasché, I. Mondino, V.
Rizzoglio and S. Verdú Andrés, Cyclinac medical accelerators using pulsed C6+/H2+ ion
sources, J. Inst. 5 C09004 (2010)
101. J. Fourrier et al, Variable energy proton therapy FFAG accelerator, proceedings of EPACS08,
1791-1793.
102. Y. Yonemura et al, Development of RF acceleration system for 150 MeV FFAG accelerator,
NIM A 576 (2007) 294-300.
103. D. Trbojevic et al., Design of a non-scaling FFAG accelerator for proton therapy, Proc. Cycl.
2004 (2005) 246–248;
104. S. Antoine et al, Principle design of a protontherapy, rapid-cycling, variable energy spiral
FFAG, Nuclear Instruments and Methods A 602 (2009) 293-305.
105. E. Keil, A. M. Sessler and D. Trbojevic, Hadron cancer therapy complex using non-scaling
fixed field alternating gradient accelerator and gantry design, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 10
(2007) 054701.
106. S. Vérdu Andrés, U. Amaldi and A. Faus-Golfe, Literature review on Linacs and FFAGs for
hadron therapy, Int J Mod Phys. A26, (2011) 1659–1689
107. Carbon ion therapy, Proceedings of the HPCBM and ENLIGHT meetings held in Baden and
in Lyon’, Radiotherapy and Oncology 73/2 (2004) 1-217.
108. T.R. Bortfeld & J.S. Loeffler Three ways to make proton therapy affordable, 28 September
2017, Nature, V 549 (2017) 451-453
109. U. Amaldi, S. Braccini, G. Magrin, P. Pearce and R. Zennaro, patent WO 2008/081480 A1.
110. J. Fuchs et al, Laser-driven proton scaling laws and new paths towards energy increase, Nature
Physics 2 (2005) 48-54.
111. S. V. Bulanov, G. A. Mourou and T. Tajima, Optics in the relativistic regime, Rev. Mod. Phys.
78 (2006) 309-372.
112. U. Linz and J. Alonso, What will it take for laser driven proton accelerators to be applied to
tumour therapy?, Phys. Rev. ST Acc. Beams 10 (2007) 094801.
113. B.T.M. Willis, C.J. Carlile: Experimental neutron scattering, Oxford University Press, 2009,
ISBN 978-0-19-851970-6.
114. F. Mezei: 2011, private communication.
115. Scientific Prospects for Neutron Scattering with support from EC/TMR and ILL, in Autrans,
France, 11-13 January 1996.
116. K. van der Meer, et al.: Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B 217 (2004) 202–220.
117. F. Mezei: Comparison of neutron efficiency of reactor and pulsed source instruments, Proc.
ICANS-XII (Abingdon 1993) (RAL Report No. 94-025), I-137; and F. Mezei: The raison
d’être of long pulse spallation sources, J. Neutron Research 6 (1997) 3-32.
118. S. Gammino, L. Celona, R. Miracoli, D. Mascali, G. Castro, G. Ciavola, F. Maimone,
R. Gobin, O. Delferrière, G. Adroit, F. Senèe: Proc. 19th Workshop ECR Ion Sources
(MOPOT012), Grenoble, August 2010, to be published on Jacow.
119. R. Gobin, et al.: High intensity ECR ion source (H + , D + , H − ) developments at CEA/Saclay,
Rev. Sci. Instrum. 73 (2002) 922.
120. M. Eshraqi, G. Franchetti, A.M. Lombardi: Emittance control in rf cavities and solenoids,
Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 12 (2009) 024201.
121. J. Stovall: Low and medium energy beam acceleration in high intensity linacs, Eur. Particle
Accelerator Conf., 2004, Lucerne, Switzerland.
122. S. Molloy, et al.: High precision superconducting cavity diagnostics with higher order mode
measurements, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 9 (2006) 112802.
123. G.E. McMichael; et al.: Accelerator research on the RCS at IPNS, Proc. EPAC’06,
MOPCH126 (2006).
124. G. H. Rees: Status of the SNS (now ISIS), Proc. PAC83, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS-30(4)
(1983) 3044-3048.
125. P. Bryant, M. Regler and M. Schuster, (eds), The AUSTRON Feasibility Study, Vienna (1994).
126. JAERI-KEK Project Team, Accelerator Technical Design Report for J-PARC, J-PARC 03-01
(2003).
791
100. A. Garonna, U. Amaldi, R. Bonomi, D. Campo, A. Degiovanni, M. Garlasché, I. Mondino, V.
Rizzoglio and S. Verdú Andrés, Cyclinac medical accelerators using pulsed C6+/H2+ ion
sources, J. Inst. 5 C09004 (2010)
101. J. Fourrier et al, Variable energy proton therapy FFAG accelerator, proceedings of EPACS08,
1791-1793.
102. Y. Yonemura et al, Development of RF acceleration system for 150 MeV FFAG accelerator,
NIM A 576 (2007) 294-300.
103. D. Trbojevic et al., Design of a non-scaling FFAG accelerator for proton therapy, Proc. Cycl.
2004 (2005) 246–248;
104. S. Antoine et al, Principle design of a protontherapy, rapid-cycling, variable energy spiral
FFAG, Nuclear Instruments and Methods A 602 (2009) 293-305.
105. E. Keil, A. M. Sessler and D. Trbojevic, Hadron cancer therapy complex using non-scaling
fixed field alternating gradient accelerator and gantry design, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 10
(2007) 054701.
106. S. Vérdu Andrés, U. Amaldi and A. Faus-Golfe, Literature review on Linacs and FFAGs for
hadron therapy, Int J Mod Phys. A26, (2011) 1659–1689
107. Carbon ion therapy, Proceedings of the HPCBM and ENLIGHT meetings held in Baden and
in Lyon’, Radiotherapy and Oncology 73/2 (2004) 1-217.
108. T.R. Bortfeld & J.S. Loeffler Three ways to make proton therapy affordable, 28 September
2017, Nature, V 549 (2017) 451-453
109. U. Amaldi, S. Braccini, G. Magrin, P. Pearce and R. Zennaro, patent WO 2008/081480 A1.
110. J. Fuchs et al, Laser-driven proton scaling laws and new paths towards energy increase, Nature
Physics 2 (2005) 48-54.
111. S. V. Bulanov, G. A. Mourou and T. Tajima, Optics in the relativistic regime, Rev. Mod. Phys.
78 (2006) 309-372.
112. U. Linz and J. Alonso, What will it take for laser driven proton accelerators to be applied to
tumour therapy?, Phys. Rev. ST Acc. Beams 10 (2007) 094801.
113. B.T.M. Willis, C.J. Carlile: Experimental neutron scattering, Oxford University Press, 2009,
ISBN 978-0-19-851970-6.
114. F. Mezei: 2011, private communication.
115. Scientific Prospects for Neutron Scattering with support from EC/TMR and ILL, in Autrans,
France, 11-13 January 1996.
116. K. van der Meer, et al.: Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B 217 (2004) 202–220.
117. F. Mezei: Comparison of neutron efficiency of reactor and pulsed source instruments, Proc.
ICANS-XII (Abingdon 1993) (RAL Report No. 94-025), I-137; and F. Mezei: The raison
d’être of long pulse spallation sources, J. Neutron Research 6 (1997) 3-32.
118. S. Gammino, L. Celona, R. Miracoli, D. Mascali, G. Castro, G. Ciavola, F. Maimone,
R. Gobin, O. Delferrière, G. Adroit, F. Senèe: Proc. 19th Workshop ECR Ion Sources
(MOPOT012), Grenoble, August 2010, to be published on Jacow.
119. R. Gobin, et al.: High intensity ECR ion source (H + , D + , H − ) developments at CEA/Saclay,
Rev. Sci. Instrum. 73 (2002) 922.
120. M. Eshraqi, G. Franchetti, A.M. Lombardi: Emittance control in rf cavities and solenoids,
Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 12 (2009) 024201.
121. J. Stovall: Low and medium energy beam acceleration in high intensity linacs, Eur. Particle
Accelerator Conf., 2004, Lucerne, Switzerland.
122. S. Molloy, et al.: High precision superconducting cavity diagnostics with higher order mode
measurements, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 9 (2006) 112802.
123. G.E. McMichael; et al.: Accelerator research on the RCS at IPNS, Proc. EPAC’06,
MOPCH126 (2006).
124. G. H. Rees: Status of the SNS (now ISIS), Proc. PAC83, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS-30(4)
(1983) 3044-3048.
125. P. Bryant, M. Regler and M. Schuster, (eds), The AUSTRON Feasibility Study, Vienna (1994).
126. JAERI-KEK Project Team, Accelerator Technical Design Report for J-PARC, J-PARC 03-01
(2003).