Table 9.1 Comparison of analytical methods
Analytes
Matrix
Pre-treatment
method
Analytical
method
LOD
RSD
(%)
Recoveries
(%)
Reference
Nap, Acy, Flo, Ph, An, Fl, Py, BaA,
BbF, BkF
Tap water
River
water,
Wastewater
MWCNTs
HPLC-UV
0.005–0.058μg/L
1.7 to
4.8
78.7 to
118.1
Wang et al.
(2007)
Nap, Acy, Ace, Flu, Ph, An, Flt, Py,
BaA, Chry, BbF, BkF, BaP, InPy,
DiahA, BghiP
Tap water,
River
water,
Sea water
MWCNTs
GCMS
2.0–8.5 ng/L
1.2 to
12.1
66.5 to
127.0
Ma et al.
(2010)
Acl, Fa, Fl, Na, Phe, Bph
Standard
solution
Modified
MWCNTs
coated on steel
fiber
HSSPME-GC
0.03–0.07 ng/mL
4.1 to
8.5
(intra)
5.5 to
9.7
(inter)
88 to105
Maghsoudi
and
Noroozian
(2012)
Chry, BaA, BbF, BkF, BaP, INPY,
DiahABghiP
Edible oil
Magnetic
MWCNTs
MSPEGCMS
0.10–0.88 ng/g
<6.8%
(intra)
<9.6%
(inter)
87.8 to
122.3%
Zhao et al.
(2011)
Nap, Acy, Ace, Flu, Anth
Standard
solution
CNT/silica
composites
NTEGCMS
0.001–0.01 ng/mL
<11.2
73.8 to
113.8
Bagheri et al.
(2011)
Na, Phen, Ant, Flur, Py, BaA, Chry,
BbF, BkF, BaP, IcdP, dBAn, BPe
Standard
solution
Magnetic
N-doped carbon
nanotubes
GCMS
0.05–0.42μg/L
1.91 to
9.01
(intra)
7.02 to
17.94
(inter)
80.50
Æ 10
to
105.40
Æ 12
Menezes
et al. (2015)
Nap, Ace, Fle, Phe, Flu, Pyr, BaA,
BbF, Bap
Tap water
River water
Graphene-based
SPE disk
GCMS
0.00084–0.013 ng/
mL
2.8
to10.9
72.8 to 106
Wang et al.
(2013)
9 Application of Carbon-Based Nanomaterials for Removal of Hydrocarbons
221