554
64. Schulz H, Mädler L, Strobel R, Jossen R, Pratsinis SE, Johannessen T (2005) Independent
control of metal cluster and ceramic particle characteristics during one-step synthesis of Pt/
TiO 2 . J Mater Res 20:2568–2577
65. Tiwari V, Jiang J, Sethi V, Biswas P (2008) One-step synthesis of noble metal–titanium dioxide nanocomposites in a flame aerosol reactor. Appl Catal Gen 345:241–246
66. Yu J, Zhang Z, Dallmann F, Zhang J, Miao D, Xu H, Goldbach A, Dittmeyer R (2016) Facile
synthesis of highly active Rh/Al 2 O 3 steam reforming catalysts with preformed support by
flame spray pyrolysis. Appl Catal Environ 198:171–179
67. Horlyck J, Sara M, Lovell EC, Amal R, Scott J (2019) Effect of metal-support interactions in
mixed Co/Al catalysts for dry reforming of methane. ChemCatChem 11:3432–3440
68. Lee S, Schneider K, Schumann J, Mogalicherla AK, Pfeifer P, Dittmeyer R (2015) Effect
of metal precursor on Cu/ZnO/Al 2 O 3 synthesized by flame spray pyrolysis for direct DME
production. Chem Eng Sci 138:194–202
69. Pongthawornsakun B, Mekasuwandumrong O, Aires FJCS, Büchel R, Baiker A, Pratsinis SE,
Panpranot J (2018) Variability of particle configurations achievable by 2-nozzle flame syntheses of the Au-Pd-TiO 2 system and their catalytic behaviors in the selective hydrogenation of
acetylene. Appl Catal Gen 549:1–7
70. Dreyer JA, Li P, Zhang L, Beh GK, Zhang R, Sit PH-L, Teoh WY (2017) Influence of the
oxide support reducibility on the CO 2 methanation over Ru-based catalysts. Appl Catal
Environ 219:715–726
71. Comazzi A, Pirola C, Di Michele A, Compagnoni M, Galli F, Rossetti I, Manenti F, Bianchi
C (2016) Flame spray pyrolysis as fine preparation technique for stable Co and Co/Ru based
catalysts for FT process. Appl Catal Gen 520:92–98
72. Wang N, Li S, Zong Y, Yao Q, Zhang Y (2017) Flame synthesis of novel ternary nanocatalysts Pd/CeO 2 TiO 2 with promotional low-temperature catalytic oxidation properties. Proc
Combust Inst 36:1029–1036
73. Spencer MS (1996) Fundamental principles. In: Twigg MV (ed) Catalyst handbook. CRC
Press, Boca Raton
74. Kumar R, Kumar K, Choudary N, Pant K (2019) Effect of support materials on the performance of Ni-based catalysts in tri-reforming of methane. Fuel Process Technol 186:40–52
75. Lee SM, Lee YH, Moon DH, Ahn JY, Nguyen DD, Chang SW, Kim SS (2019) Reaction
mechanism and catalytic impact of Ni/CeO 2–x catalyst for low-temperature CO 2 methanation.
Ind Eng Chem Res 58:8656–8662
76. Wang F, He S, Chen H, Wang B, Zheng L, Wei M, Evans DG, Duan X (2016) Active site
dependent reaction mechanism over Ru/CeO 2 catalyst toward CO 2 methanation. J Am Chem
Soc 138:6298–6305
77. Yentekakis IV, Goula G, Hatzisymeon M, Betsi-Argyropoulou I, Botzolaki G, Kousi K,
Kondarides DI, Taylor MJ, Parlett CM, Osatiashtiani A (2019) Effect of support oxygen storage capacity on the catalytic performance of Rh nanoparticles for CO 2 reforming of methane.
Appl Catal Environ 243:490–501
78. Xu L, Zhao H, Song H, Chou L (2012) Ordered mesoporous alumina supported nickel based
catalysts for carbon dioxide reforming of methane. Int J Hydrogen Energy 37:7497–7511
79. Zhang D, Liu W-Q, Liu Y-A, Etim U, Liu X-M, Yan Z-F (2017) Pore confinement effect of
MoO3/Al2O3 catalyst for deep hydrodesulfurization. Chem Eng J 330:706–717
80. Hu X, Foo ML, Chuah GK, Jaenicke S (2000) Pore size engineering on MCM-41: selectivity
tuning of heterogenized AlCl3 for the synthesis of linear alkyl benzenes. J Catal 195:412–415
81. Olsbye U, Svelle S, Bjørgen M, Beato P, Janssens TV, Joensen F, Bordiga S, Lillerud KP
(2012) Conversion of methanol to hydrocarbons: how zeolite cavity and pore size controls
product selectivity. Angew Chem Int Ed 51:5810–5831
82. Sharma L, Kumar M, Saxena A, Chand M, Gupta J (2002) Influence of pore size distribution
on Pt dispersion in Pt-Sn/Al 2 O 3 reforming catalyst. J Mol Catal A Chem 185:135–141
83. Che M, Védrine JC (2012) Characterization of solid materials and heterogeneous catalysts:
From structure to surface reactivity. Wiley, Chichester
O. Okonkwo and P. Biswas
64. Schulz H, Mädler L, Strobel R, Jossen R, Pratsinis SE, Johannessen T (2005) Independent
control of metal cluster and ceramic particle characteristics during one-step synthesis of Pt/
TiO 2 . J Mater Res 20:2568–2577
65. Tiwari V, Jiang J, Sethi V, Biswas P (2008) One-step synthesis of noble metal–titanium dioxide nanocomposites in a flame aerosol reactor. Appl Catal Gen 345:241–246
66. Yu J, Zhang Z, Dallmann F, Zhang J, Miao D, Xu H, Goldbach A, Dittmeyer R (2016) Facile
synthesis of highly active Rh/Al 2 O 3 steam reforming catalysts with preformed support by
flame spray pyrolysis. Appl Catal Environ 198:171–179
67. Horlyck J, Sara M, Lovell EC, Amal R, Scott J (2019) Effect of metal-support interactions in
mixed Co/Al catalysts for dry reforming of methane. ChemCatChem 11:3432–3440
68. Lee S, Schneider K, Schumann J, Mogalicherla AK, Pfeifer P, Dittmeyer R (2015) Effect
of metal precursor on Cu/ZnO/Al 2 O 3 synthesized by flame spray pyrolysis for direct DME
production. Chem Eng Sci 138:194–202
69. Pongthawornsakun B, Mekasuwandumrong O, Aires FJCS, Büchel R, Baiker A, Pratsinis SE,
Panpranot J (2018) Variability of particle configurations achievable by 2-nozzle flame syntheses of the Au-Pd-TiO 2 system and their catalytic behaviors in the selective hydrogenation of
acetylene. Appl Catal Gen 549:1–7
70. Dreyer JA, Li P, Zhang L, Beh GK, Zhang R, Sit PH-L, Teoh WY (2017) Influence of the
oxide support reducibility on the CO 2 methanation over Ru-based catalysts. Appl Catal
Environ 219:715–726
71. Comazzi A, Pirola C, Di Michele A, Compagnoni M, Galli F, Rossetti I, Manenti F, Bianchi
C (2016) Flame spray pyrolysis as fine preparation technique for stable Co and Co/Ru based
catalysts for FT process. Appl Catal Gen 520:92–98
72. Wang N, Li S, Zong Y, Yao Q, Zhang Y (2017) Flame synthesis of novel ternary nanocatalysts Pd/CeO 2 TiO 2 with promotional low-temperature catalytic oxidation properties. Proc
Combust Inst 36:1029–1036
73. Spencer MS (1996) Fundamental principles. In: Twigg MV (ed) Catalyst handbook. CRC
Press, Boca Raton
74. Kumar R, Kumar K, Choudary N, Pant K (2019) Effect of support materials on the performance of Ni-based catalysts in tri-reforming of methane. Fuel Process Technol 186:40–52
75. Lee SM, Lee YH, Moon DH, Ahn JY, Nguyen DD, Chang SW, Kim SS (2019) Reaction
mechanism and catalytic impact of Ni/CeO 2–x catalyst for low-temperature CO 2 methanation.
Ind Eng Chem Res 58:8656–8662
76. Wang F, He S, Chen H, Wang B, Zheng L, Wei M, Evans DG, Duan X (2016) Active site
dependent reaction mechanism over Ru/CeO 2 catalyst toward CO 2 methanation. J Am Chem
Soc 138:6298–6305
77. Yentekakis IV, Goula G, Hatzisymeon M, Betsi-Argyropoulou I, Botzolaki G, Kousi K,
Kondarides DI, Taylor MJ, Parlett CM, Osatiashtiani A (2019) Effect of support oxygen storage capacity on the catalytic performance of Rh nanoparticles for CO 2 reforming of methane.
Appl Catal Environ 243:490–501
78. Xu L, Zhao H, Song H, Chou L (2012) Ordered mesoporous alumina supported nickel based
catalysts for carbon dioxide reforming of methane. Int J Hydrogen Energy 37:7497–7511
79. Zhang D, Liu W-Q, Liu Y-A, Etim U, Liu X-M, Yan Z-F (2017) Pore confinement effect of
MoO3/Al2O3 catalyst for deep hydrodesulfurization. Chem Eng J 330:706–717
80. Hu X, Foo ML, Chuah GK, Jaenicke S (2000) Pore size engineering on MCM-41: selectivity
tuning of heterogenized AlCl3 for the synthesis of linear alkyl benzenes. J Catal 195:412–415
81. Olsbye U, Svelle S, Bjørgen M, Beato P, Janssens TV, Joensen F, Bordiga S, Lillerud KP
(2012) Conversion of methanol to hydrocarbons: how zeolite cavity and pore size controls
product selectivity. Angew Chem Int Ed 51:5810–5831
82. Sharma L, Kumar M, Saxena A, Chand M, Gupta J (2002) Influence of pore size distribution
on Pt dispersion in Pt-Sn/Al 2 O 3 reforming catalyst. J Mol Catal A Chem 185:135–141
83. Che M, Védrine JC (2012) Characterization of solid materials and heterogeneous catalysts:
From structure to surface reactivity. Wiley, Chichester
O. Okonkwo and P. Biswas