373
65. Bakhtiar SUH et al (2018) CTAB-assisted size controlled synthesis of SAPO-34 and its
contribution toward MTO performance. Dalton Trans 47:9861. https://doi.org/10.1039/
c8dt01811a
66. Xu Z et al (2019) Size control of SSZ-13 crystals with APAM and its influence on the coking
behaviour during MTO reaction. Cat Sci Technol 9:2888. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9cy00412b
67. Ma M et al (2020) Synthesis of small-sized SAPO-34 assisted by pluronic F127 nonionic
surfactant and its catalytic performance for methanol to olefins (MTO). Catal Commun
133:105839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2019.105839
68. Li M et al (2017) Solvent-free synthesis of SAPO-34 nanocrystals with reduced template
consumption for methanol-to-olefins process. Appl Catal A Gen 531:203. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.apcata.2016.11.005
69. Dai W, Wu G, Li L, Guan N, Hunger M (2013) Mechanisms of the deactivation of SAPO-34
materials with different crystal sizes applied as MTO catalysts. ACS Catal 3:588. https://doi.
org/10.1021/cs400007v
70. Gao S et al (2018) Insight into the deactivation mode of methanol-to-olefins conversion
over SAPO-34: coke, diffusion, and acidic site accessibility. J Catal 367:306. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.jcat.2018.09.010
71. Xu B, Bordiga S, Prins R, van Bokhoven JA (2007) Effect of framework Si/Al ratio and
extra-framework aluminum on the catalytic activity of Y zeolite. Appl Catal A Gen 333:245.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2007.09.018
72. Aguayo AT, Gayubo AG, Vivanco R, Olazar M, Bilbao J (2005) Role of acidity and microporous structure in alternative catalysts for the transformation of methanol into olefins. Appl
Catal A Gen 283:197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2005.01.006
73. Zhu Q et al (2008) The study of methanol-to-olefin over proton type aluminosilicate CHA zeolites. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 112:153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
micromeso.2007.09.026
74. Zhu Q et al (2008) Methanol-to-olefin over gallosilicate analogues of chabazite zeolite.
Microporous Mesoporous Mater 116:253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2008.04.017
75. Dai W et al (2011) Methanol-to-olefin conversion on silicoaluminophosphate catalysts: effect
of brønsted acid sites and framework structures. ACS Catal 1:292. https://doi.org/10.1021/
cs200016u
76. Dai W et al (2012) Methanol-to-olefin conversion catalyzed by low-silica AlPO-34 with traces
of Brønsted acid sites: combined catalytic and spectroscopic investigations. ChemCatChem
4:1428. https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201100503
77. Deimund MA et al (2016) Effect of heteroatom concentration in SSZ-13 on the methanol-toolefins reaction. ACS Catal 6:542. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.5b01450
78. Liang T et al (2016) Conversion of methanol to olefins over H-ZSM-5 zeolite: reaction pathway is related to the framework aluminum siting. ACS Catal 6:7311. https://doi.org/10.1021/
acscatal.6b01771
79. Wang S et al (2019) Tuning the siting of aluminum in ZSM-11 zeolite and regulating its
catalytic performance in the conversion of methanol to olefins. J Catal 377:81. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.jcat.2019.07.028
80. Müller S et al (2016) Hydrogen transfer pathways during zeolite catalyzed methanol conversion to hydrocarbons. J Am Chem Soc 138:15994. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b09605
81. Losch P et al (2017) H-ZSM-5 zeolite model crystals: structure-diffusion-activity relationship
in methanol-to-olefins catalysis. J Catal 345:11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2016.11.005
82. Chu Y, Yi X, Li C, Sun X, Zheng A (2018) Brønsted/Lewis acid sites synergistically promote the initial C-C bond formation in the MTO reaction. Chem Sci 9:6470. https://doi.
org/10.1039/c8sc02302f
83. Wilson S, Barger P (1999) The characteristics of SAPO-34 which influence the conversion of
methanol to light olefins. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 29:117–126
84. Mitchell S et al (2015) Aluminum redistribution during the preparation of hierarchical zeolites by Desilication. Chem A Eur J 21:14156. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201500992
Shifting Trend of Rational Design Heuristics for Methanol-to-Olefins (MTO) Catalysts
65. Bakhtiar SUH et al (2018) CTAB-assisted size controlled synthesis of SAPO-34 and its
contribution toward MTO performance. Dalton Trans 47:9861. https://doi.org/10.1039/
c8dt01811a
66. Xu Z et al (2019) Size control of SSZ-13 crystals with APAM and its influence on the coking
behaviour during MTO reaction. Cat Sci Technol 9:2888. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9cy00412b
67. Ma M et al (2020) Synthesis of small-sized SAPO-34 assisted by pluronic F127 nonionic
surfactant and its catalytic performance for methanol to olefins (MTO). Catal Commun
133:105839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2019.105839
68. Li M et al (2017) Solvent-free synthesis of SAPO-34 nanocrystals with reduced template
consumption for methanol-to-olefins process. Appl Catal A Gen 531:203. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.apcata.2016.11.005
69. Dai W, Wu G, Li L, Guan N, Hunger M (2013) Mechanisms of the deactivation of SAPO-34
materials with different crystal sizes applied as MTO catalysts. ACS Catal 3:588. https://doi.
org/10.1021/cs400007v
70. Gao S et al (2018) Insight into the deactivation mode of methanol-to-olefins conversion
over SAPO-34: coke, diffusion, and acidic site accessibility. J Catal 367:306. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.jcat.2018.09.010
71. Xu B, Bordiga S, Prins R, van Bokhoven JA (2007) Effect of framework Si/Al ratio and
extra-framework aluminum on the catalytic activity of Y zeolite. Appl Catal A Gen 333:245.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2007.09.018
72. Aguayo AT, Gayubo AG, Vivanco R, Olazar M, Bilbao J (2005) Role of acidity and microporous structure in alternative catalysts for the transformation of methanol into olefins. Appl
Catal A Gen 283:197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2005.01.006
73. Zhu Q et al (2008) The study of methanol-to-olefin over proton type aluminosilicate CHA zeolites. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 112:153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
micromeso.2007.09.026
74. Zhu Q et al (2008) Methanol-to-olefin over gallosilicate analogues of chabazite zeolite.
Microporous Mesoporous Mater 116:253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2008.04.017
75. Dai W et al (2011) Methanol-to-olefin conversion on silicoaluminophosphate catalysts: effect
of brønsted acid sites and framework structures. ACS Catal 1:292. https://doi.org/10.1021/
cs200016u
76. Dai W et al (2012) Methanol-to-olefin conversion catalyzed by low-silica AlPO-34 with traces
of Brønsted acid sites: combined catalytic and spectroscopic investigations. ChemCatChem
4:1428. https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201100503
77. Deimund MA et al (2016) Effect of heteroatom concentration in SSZ-13 on the methanol-toolefins reaction. ACS Catal 6:542. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.5b01450
78. Liang T et al (2016) Conversion of methanol to olefins over H-ZSM-5 zeolite: reaction pathway is related to the framework aluminum siting. ACS Catal 6:7311. https://doi.org/10.1021/
acscatal.6b01771
79. Wang S et al (2019) Tuning the siting of aluminum in ZSM-11 zeolite and regulating its
catalytic performance in the conversion of methanol to olefins. J Catal 377:81. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.jcat.2019.07.028
80. Müller S et al (2016) Hydrogen transfer pathways during zeolite catalyzed methanol conversion to hydrocarbons. J Am Chem Soc 138:15994. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b09605
81. Losch P et al (2017) H-ZSM-5 zeolite model crystals: structure-diffusion-activity relationship
in methanol-to-olefins catalysis. J Catal 345:11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2016.11.005
82. Chu Y, Yi X, Li C, Sun X, Zheng A (2018) Brønsted/Lewis acid sites synergistically promote the initial C-C bond formation in the MTO reaction. Chem Sci 9:6470. https://doi.
org/10.1039/c8sc02302f
83. Wilson S, Barger P (1999) The characteristics of SAPO-34 which influence the conversion of
methanol to light olefins. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 29:117–126
84. Mitchell S et al (2015) Aluminum redistribution during the preparation of hierarchical zeolites by Desilication. Chem A Eur J 21:14156. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201500992
Shifting Trend of Rational Design Heuristics for Methanol-to-Olefins (MTO) Catalysts