371
28. Park JW, Seo G (2009) IR study on methanol-to-olefin reaction over zeolites with different pore structures and acidities. Appl Catal A Gen 356:180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
apcata.2009.01.001
29. Zhu Q et al (2007) A comparative study of methanol to olefin over CHA and MTF zeolites. J
Phys Chem C 111:5409. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp063172c
30. Min HK, Park MB, Hong SB (2010) Methanol-to-olefin conversion over H-MCM-22 and
H-ITQ-2 zeolites. J Catal 271:186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2010.01.012
31. Kumita Y, Gascon J, Stavitski E, Moulijn JA, Kapteijn F (2011) Shape selective methanol
to olefins over highly thermostable DDR catalysts. Appl Catal A Gen 391:234. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.apcata.2010.07.023
32. Chen J et al (2014) Spatial confinement effects of cage-type SAPO molecular sieves on product distribution and coke formation in methanol-to-olefin reaction. Catal Commun 46:36.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2013.11.016
33. Li J et al (2015) Cavity controls the selectivity: insights of confinement effects on MTO reaction. ACS Catal 5:661. https://doi.org/10.1021/cs501669k
34. Li X et al (2014) Confinement effect of zeolite cavities on methanol-to-olefin conversion:
a density functional theory study. J Phys Chem C 118:24935. https://doi.org/10.1021/
jp505696m
35. Kang JH, Alshafei FH, Zones SI, Davis ME (2019) Cage-defining ring: a molecular sieve
structural Indicator for light olefin product distribution from the methanol-to-olefins reaction.
ACS Catal 9:6012. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.9b00746
36. Zhang W et al (2018) Methanol to olefins reaction over cavity-type zeolite: cavity controls
the critical intermediates and product selectivity. ACS Catal 8:10950. https://doi.org/10.1021/
acscatal.8b02164
37. Yang M et al (2020) High propylene selectivity in methanol conversion over a small-pore
SAPO molecular sieve with ultra-small cage. ACS Catal 10:3741. https://doi.org/10.1021/
acscatal.9b04703
38. Li C et al (2018) Synthesis of reaction-adapted zeolites as methanol-to-olefins catalysts with
mimics of reaction intermediates as organic structure-directing agents. Nat Catal 1:547.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929- 018- 0104- 7
39. Bleken F et al (2011) Conversion of methanol over 10-ring zeolites with differing volumes at
channel intersections: comparison of TNU-9, IM-5, ZSM-11 and ZSM-5. Phys Chem Chem
Phys 13:2539. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cp01982h
40. Ahn NH, Seo S, Hong SB (2016) Small-pore molecular sieves SAPO-57 and SAPO-59:
synthesis, characterization, and catalytic properties in methanol-to-olefins conversion. Cat
Sci Technol 6:2725. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cy02103k
41. Rahimi K, Towfighi J, Sedighi M, Masoumi S, Kooshki Z (2016) The effects of SiO2/
Al2O3 and H2O/Al2O3 molar ratios on SAPO-34 catalysts in methanol to olefins (MTO)
process using experimental design. J Ind Eng Chem 35:123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jiec.2015.12.015
42. Izadbakhsh A et al (2009) Effect of SAPO-34’s composition on its physico-chemical properties and deactivation in MTO process. Appl Catal A Gen 364:48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
apcata.2009.05.022
43. Sun Q, Wang N, Bai R, Chen X, Yu J (2016) Seeding induced nano-sized hierarchical
SAPO-34 zeolites: cost-effective synthesis and superior MTO performance. J Mater Chem A
4:14978. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ta06613e
44. Masoumi S, Towfighi J, Mohamadalizadeh A, Kooshki Z, Rahimi K (2015) Tri-templates
synthesis of SAPO-34 and its performance in MTO reaction by statistical design of experiments. Appl Catal A Gen 493:103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2014.12.033
45. Li J, Li Z, Han D, Wu J (2014) Facile synthesis of SAPO-34 with small crystal size for
conversion of methanol to olefins. Powder Technol 262:177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
powtec.2014.04.082
Shifting Trend of Rational Design Heuristics for Methanol-to-Olefins (MTO) Catalysts
28. Park JW, Seo G (2009) IR study on methanol-to-olefin reaction over zeolites with different pore structures and acidities. Appl Catal A Gen 356:180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
apcata.2009.01.001
29. Zhu Q et al (2007) A comparative study of methanol to olefin over CHA and MTF zeolites. J
Phys Chem C 111:5409. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp063172c
30. Min HK, Park MB, Hong SB (2010) Methanol-to-olefin conversion over H-MCM-22 and
H-ITQ-2 zeolites. J Catal 271:186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2010.01.012
31. Kumita Y, Gascon J, Stavitski E, Moulijn JA, Kapteijn F (2011) Shape selective methanol
to olefins over highly thermostable DDR catalysts. Appl Catal A Gen 391:234. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.apcata.2010.07.023
32. Chen J et al (2014) Spatial confinement effects of cage-type SAPO molecular sieves on product distribution and coke formation in methanol-to-olefin reaction. Catal Commun 46:36.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2013.11.016
33. Li J et al (2015) Cavity controls the selectivity: insights of confinement effects on MTO reaction. ACS Catal 5:661. https://doi.org/10.1021/cs501669k
34. Li X et al (2014) Confinement effect of zeolite cavities on methanol-to-olefin conversion:
a density functional theory study. J Phys Chem C 118:24935. https://doi.org/10.1021/
jp505696m
35. Kang JH, Alshafei FH, Zones SI, Davis ME (2019) Cage-defining ring: a molecular sieve
structural Indicator for light olefin product distribution from the methanol-to-olefins reaction.
ACS Catal 9:6012. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.9b00746
36. Zhang W et al (2018) Methanol to olefins reaction over cavity-type zeolite: cavity controls
the critical intermediates and product selectivity. ACS Catal 8:10950. https://doi.org/10.1021/
acscatal.8b02164
37. Yang M et al (2020) High propylene selectivity in methanol conversion over a small-pore
SAPO molecular sieve with ultra-small cage. ACS Catal 10:3741. https://doi.org/10.1021/
acscatal.9b04703
38. Li C et al (2018) Synthesis of reaction-adapted zeolites as methanol-to-olefins catalysts with
mimics of reaction intermediates as organic structure-directing agents. Nat Catal 1:547.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929- 018- 0104- 7
39. Bleken F et al (2011) Conversion of methanol over 10-ring zeolites with differing volumes at
channel intersections: comparison of TNU-9, IM-5, ZSM-11 and ZSM-5. Phys Chem Chem
Phys 13:2539. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cp01982h
40. Ahn NH, Seo S, Hong SB (2016) Small-pore molecular sieves SAPO-57 and SAPO-59:
synthesis, characterization, and catalytic properties in methanol-to-olefins conversion. Cat
Sci Technol 6:2725. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cy02103k
41. Rahimi K, Towfighi J, Sedighi M, Masoumi S, Kooshki Z (2016) The effects of SiO2/
Al2O3 and H2O/Al2O3 molar ratios on SAPO-34 catalysts in methanol to olefins (MTO)
process using experimental design. J Ind Eng Chem 35:123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jiec.2015.12.015
42. Izadbakhsh A et al (2009) Effect of SAPO-34’s composition on its physico-chemical properties and deactivation in MTO process. Appl Catal A Gen 364:48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
apcata.2009.05.022
43. Sun Q, Wang N, Bai R, Chen X, Yu J (2016) Seeding induced nano-sized hierarchical
SAPO-34 zeolites: cost-effective synthesis and superior MTO performance. J Mater Chem A
4:14978. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ta06613e
44. Masoumi S, Towfighi J, Mohamadalizadeh A, Kooshki Z, Rahimi K (2015) Tri-templates
synthesis of SAPO-34 and its performance in MTO reaction by statistical design of experiments. Appl Catal A Gen 493:103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2014.12.033
45. Li J, Li Z, Han D, Wu J (2014) Facile synthesis of SAPO-34 with small crystal size for
conversion of methanol to olefins. Powder Technol 262:177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
powtec.2014.04.082
Shifting Trend of Rational Design Heuristics for Methanol-to-Olefins (MTO) Catalysts