370
10. Wang Q, Cui ZM, Cao CY, Song WG (2011) 0.3 Å makes the difference: dramatic changes
in methanol-to-olefin activities between H-ZSM-12 and H-ZSM-22 zeolites. J Phys Chem C
115:24987. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp209182u
11. Chen JQ, Bozzano A, Glover B, Fuglerud T, Kvisle S (2005) Recent advancements in ethylene and propylene production using the UOP/hydro MTO process. Catal Today 106:103.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2005.07.178
12. Yarulina I, Chowdhury AD, Meirer F, Weckhuysen BM, Gascon J (2018) Recent trends and
fundamental insights in the methanol-to-hydrocarbons process. Nat Catal 1:398. https://doi.
org/10.1038/s41929- 018- 0078- 5
13. Castro M et al (2009) Silicoaluminophosphate molecular sieves STA-7 and STA-14 and their
structure-dependent catalytic performance in the conversion of methanol to olefins. J Phys
Chem C 113:15731. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp904623a
14. Goetze J et al (2017) Insights into the activity and deactivation of the methanol-to-olefins
process over different small-pore zeolites as studied with operando UV-vis spectroscopy.
ACS Catal 7:4033. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.6b03677
15. Li X, Shen W, Zheng A (2019) The influence of acid strength and pore size effect on propene elimination reaction over zeolites: a theoretical study. Microporous Mesoporous Mater.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2018.11.026
16. Boruntea CR, Sastre G, Lundegaard LF, Corma A, Vennestrøm PNR (2019) Synthesis of
high-silica erionite driven by computational screening of hypothetical zeolites. Chem Mater
31:9268. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b01229
17. Martínez-Franco R, Paris C, Martínez-Triguero J, Moliner M, Corma A (2017) Direct synthesis of the aluminosilicate form of the small pore CDO zeolite with novel OSDAs and the
expanded polymorphs. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 246:147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
micromeso.2017.03.014
18. Ferri P et al (2019) Chemical and structural parameter connecting cavity architecture, confined hydrocarbon Pool species, and MTO product selectivity in small-pore cage-based zeolites. ACS Catal 9:11542. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.9b04588
19. Deimund MA, Schmidt JE, Davis ME (2015) Effect of pore and cage size on the formation
of aromatic intermediates during the methanol-to-olefins reaction. Top Catal 58:416. https://
doi.org/10.1007/s11244- 015- 0384- y
20. Haw JF, Song W, Marcus DM, Nicholas JB (2003) The mechanism of methanol to hydrocarbon catalysis. Acc Chem Res 36:317. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar020006o
21. Jing B et al (2017) Comparative study of methanol to olefins over ZSM-5, ZSM-11, ZSM-22
and EU-1: Dependence of catalytic performance on the zeolite framework structure. Journal
of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology 17, 3680–3688,https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2017.13986
22. Dyballa M et al (2018) Tuning the material and catalytic properties of SUZ-4 zeolites
for the conversion of methanol or methane. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2018.02.004
23. Teketel S et al (2012) Shape selectivity in the conversion of methanol to hydrocarbons: the
catalytic performance of one-dimensional 10-ring zeolites: ZSM-22, ZSM-23, ZSM-48, and
EU-1. ACS Catal. https://doi.org/10.1021/cs200517u
24. Wang S et al (2018) Relation of catalytic performance to the aluminum siting of acidic zeolites in the conversion of methanol to olefins, viewed via a comparison between ZSM-5 and
ZSM-11. ACS Catal 8:5485. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.8b01054
25. Sastre G (2016) Confinement effects in methanol to olefins catalysed by zeolites: a computational review. Front Chem Sci Eng 10:76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705- 016- 1557- 3
26. Li X, Jiang J (2018) Methanol-to-olefin conversion in ABC-6 zeolite cavities: unravelling the
role of cavity shape and size from density functional theory calculations. Phys Chem Chem
Phys 20:14322. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cp00572a
27. Bhawe Y et al (2012) Effect of cage size on the selective conversion of methanol to light
olefins. ACS Catal 2:2490. https://doi.org/10.1021/cs300558x
M. Kumar
10. Wang Q, Cui ZM, Cao CY, Song WG (2011) 0.3 Å makes the difference: dramatic changes
in methanol-to-olefin activities between H-ZSM-12 and H-ZSM-22 zeolites. J Phys Chem C
115:24987. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp209182u
11. Chen JQ, Bozzano A, Glover B, Fuglerud T, Kvisle S (2005) Recent advancements in ethylene and propylene production using the UOP/hydro MTO process. Catal Today 106:103.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2005.07.178
12. Yarulina I, Chowdhury AD, Meirer F, Weckhuysen BM, Gascon J (2018) Recent trends and
fundamental insights in the methanol-to-hydrocarbons process. Nat Catal 1:398. https://doi.
org/10.1038/s41929- 018- 0078- 5
13. Castro M et al (2009) Silicoaluminophosphate molecular sieves STA-7 and STA-14 and their
structure-dependent catalytic performance in the conversion of methanol to olefins. J Phys
Chem C 113:15731. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp904623a
14. Goetze J et al (2017) Insights into the activity and deactivation of the methanol-to-olefins
process over different small-pore zeolites as studied with operando UV-vis spectroscopy.
ACS Catal 7:4033. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.6b03677
15. Li X, Shen W, Zheng A (2019) The influence of acid strength and pore size effect on propene elimination reaction over zeolites: a theoretical study. Microporous Mesoporous Mater.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2018.11.026
16. Boruntea CR, Sastre G, Lundegaard LF, Corma A, Vennestrøm PNR (2019) Synthesis of
high-silica erionite driven by computational screening of hypothetical zeolites. Chem Mater
31:9268. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b01229
17. Martínez-Franco R, Paris C, Martínez-Triguero J, Moliner M, Corma A (2017) Direct synthesis of the aluminosilicate form of the small pore CDO zeolite with novel OSDAs and the
expanded polymorphs. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 246:147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
micromeso.2017.03.014
18. Ferri P et al (2019) Chemical and structural parameter connecting cavity architecture, confined hydrocarbon Pool species, and MTO product selectivity in small-pore cage-based zeolites. ACS Catal 9:11542. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.9b04588
19. Deimund MA, Schmidt JE, Davis ME (2015) Effect of pore and cage size on the formation
of aromatic intermediates during the methanol-to-olefins reaction. Top Catal 58:416. https://
doi.org/10.1007/s11244- 015- 0384- y
20. Haw JF, Song W, Marcus DM, Nicholas JB (2003) The mechanism of methanol to hydrocarbon catalysis. Acc Chem Res 36:317. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar020006o
21. Jing B et al (2017) Comparative study of methanol to olefins over ZSM-5, ZSM-11, ZSM-22
and EU-1: Dependence of catalytic performance on the zeolite framework structure. Journal
of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology 17, 3680–3688,https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2017.13986
22. Dyballa M et al (2018) Tuning the material and catalytic properties of SUZ-4 zeolites
for the conversion of methanol or methane. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2018.02.004
23. Teketel S et al (2012) Shape selectivity in the conversion of methanol to hydrocarbons: the
catalytic performance of one-dimensional 10-ring zeolites: ZSM-22, ZSM-23, ZSM-48, and
EU-1. ACS Catal. https://doi.org/10.1021/cs200517u
24. Wang S et al (2018) Relation of catalytic performance to the aluminum siting of acidic zeolites in the conversion of methanol to olefins, viewed via a comparison between ZSM-5 and
ZSM-11. ACS Catal 8:5485. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.8b01054
25. Sastre G (2016) Confinement effects in methanol to olefins catalysed by zeolites: a computational review. Front Chem Sci Eng 10:76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705- 016- 1557- 3
26. Li X, Jiang J (2018) Methanol-to-olefin conversion in ABC-6 zeolite cavities: unravelling the
role of cavity shape and size from density functional theory calculations. Phys Chem Chem
Phys 20:14322. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cp00572a
27. Bhawe Y et al (2012) Effect of cage size on the selective conversion of methanol to light
olefins. ACS Catal 2:2490. https://doi.org/10.1021/cs300558x
M. Kumar