90
5 Applications of the Metadata Standards
4. P. de Buyl, P.H. Colberg, F. Höfling, H5MD: a structured, efficient, and portable file format for
molecular data. Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 1546–1553 (2014)
5. W. Colsman, R. Uphill, A portable data format for laboratory data (Sci. Comput, World
Feature, 2015)
6. H. Oberkampf, H. Krieg, C. Senger, T. Weber, W. Colsman, Allotrope data format: semantic
data management in life sciences, in Proceedings of SWAT4HCLS 2018, ed. by A. Splendani
(2018)
7. M.T. Horsch, S. Chiacchiera, M.A. Seaton, I.T. Todorov, K. Šindelka, M. Lísal, B. Andreon,
E.B. Kaiser, G. Mogni, G. Goldbeck, R. Kunze, G. Summer, A. Fiseni, H. Brüning, P. Schiffels,
W.L. Cavalcanti, Ontologies for the Virtual Materials Marketplace. Künstl. Intell. 34(3), 423–
428 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-020-00648-9
8. G. Goldbeck, E. Ghedini, A. Hashibon, G.J. Schmitz, J. Friis, A reference language and ontology for materials modelling and interoperability, in Proceedings of NWC 2019, NAFEMS,
(Knutsford, UK, 2019), p NWC_19_86
9. EMMC Coordination and Support Action, European Materials and Modelling Ontology (2020),
https://github.com/emmo-repo/, https://emmc.info/emmo-info/. Accessed 8 Apr 2020
10. A.C. Varzi, Parts, wholes, and part-whole relations: the prospects of mereotopology. Data
Knowl. Eng. 20, 259–286 (1996)
11. C.S. Peirce, Peirce on Signs: Writings on Semiotic (University of North Carolina Press, Chapel
Hill, North Carolina, USA, 1991)
12. D. Lewis, New work for a theory of universals. Aust. J. Philos. 61(4), 343–377 (1983)
13. M.T. Horsch, S. Chiacchiera, B. Schembera, M.A. Seaton, I.T. Todorov, Semantic interoperability based on the European materials and modelling ontology and its ontological paradigm:
mereosemiotics, in Proceedings of WCCM-ECCOMAS 2020, to appear (2021). https://doi.org/
10.5281/zenodo.3902900
14. D. Westerståhl, The traditional square of opposition and generalized quantifiers. Stud. Logic
(Beijing) 2, 1–18 (2008)
15. D. Westerståhl, Classical vs. modern squares of opposition, and beyond, in The Square of
Opposition: A General Framework for Cognition, ed. by J.Y. Béziau, G. Payette (Switzerland,
Peter Lang, Bern, 2012), pp. 195–229
16. F. Berto, M. Plebani, Ontology and Metaontology (Bloomsbury, London, UK, 2015)
17. M. Huth, M. Ryan, Logic in Computer Science: Modelling and Reasoning about Systems, 2nd
edn. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004)
18. B. Smith, Mereotopology: a theory of parts and boundaries. Data Knowl. Eng. 20(3), 287–303
(1996)
19. B. Smith, A.C. Varzi, Fiat and bona fide boundaries. Philos. Phenomenol. Res. 60(2), 103–119
(2000)
20. CEN-CENELEC Management Centre, Materials modelling: terminology, classification and
metadata, in CEN Workshop Agreement 17284 (Belgium, Brussels, 2018)
21. M.T. Horsch, C. Niethammer, G. Boccardo, P. Carbone, S. Chiacchiera, M. Chiricotto, J.D.
Elliott, V. Lobaskin, P. Neumann, P. Schiffels, M.A. Seaton, I.T. Todorov, J. Vrabec, W.L.
Cavalcanti, Semantic interoperability and characterization of data provenance in computational
molecular engineering. J. Chem. Eng. Data 65(3), 1313–1329 (2020)
22. B. Hu, B. Hu, Tower of Babel: Interoperability of ontologies for pervasive computing, in First
International Symposium on Pervasive Computing and Applications, ed. by V. Callaghan, B.
Hu, Z. Lin, H. Zhang (IEEE, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA, 2006), pp. 690–695
23. A. Iliadis, The tower of Babel problem: making data make sense with basic formal ontology.
Online Inf. Rev. 43(6), 1021–1045 (2019)
24. C.H. Asuncion, M.J. van Sunderen, Pragmatic interoperability: a systematic review of published
definitions, in Proceedings of EAI2N, WCC 2010, ed. by P. Bernus, G. Doumeingts, M. Fox
(Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 2010), pp. 164–175
25. M.T. Horsch, S. Chiacchiera, M.A. Seaton, I.T. Todorov, B. Schembera, P. Klein, N.A. Konchakova, Pragmatic interoperability and translation of industrial engineering problems into
modelling and simulation solutions, in Proceedings of DAMDID 2020, to appear (2021). https://
doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3902873
5 Applications of the Metadata Standards
4. P. de Buyl, P.H. Colberg, F. Höfling, H5MD: a structured, efficient, and portable file format for
molecular data. Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 1546–1553 (2014)
5. W. Colsman, R. Uphill, A portable data format for laboratory data (Sci. Comput, World
Feature, 2015)
6. H. Oberkampf, H. Krieg, C. Senger, T. Weber, W. Colsman, Allotrope data format: semantic
data management in life sciences, in Proceedings of SWAT4HCLS 2018, ed. by A. Splendani
(2018)
7. M.T. Horsch, S. Chiacchiera, M.A. Seaton, I.T. Todorov, K. Šindelka, M. Lísal, B. Andreon,
E.B. Kaiser, G. Mogni, G. Goldbeck, R. Kunze, G. Summer, A. Fiseni, H. Brüning, P. Schiffels,
W.L. Cavalcanti, Ontologies for the Virtual Materials Marketplace. Künstl. Intell. 34(3), 423–
428 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-020-00648-9
8. G. Goldbeck, E. Ghedini, A. Hashibon, G.J. Schmitz, J. Friis, A reference language and ontology for materials modelling and interoperability, in Proceedings of NWC 2019, NAFEMS,
(Knutsford, UK, 2019), p NWC_19_86
9. EMMC Coordination and Support Action, European Materials and Modelling Ontology (2020),
https://github.com/emmo-repo/, https://emmc.info/emmo-info/. Accessed 8 Apr 2020
10. A.C. Varzi, Parts, wholes, and part-whole relations: the prospects of mereotopology. Data
Knowl. Eng. 20, 259–286 (1996)
11. C.S. Peirce, Peirce on Signs: Writings on Semiotic (University of North Carolina Press, Chapel
Hill, North Carolina, USA, 1991)
12. D. Lewis, New work for a theory of universals. Aust. J. Philos. 61(4), 343–377 (1983)
13. M.T. Horsch, S. Chiacchiera, B. Schembera, M.A. Seaton, I.T. Todorov, Semantic interoperability based on the European materials and modelling ontology and its ontological paradigm:
mereosemiotics, in Proceedings of WCCM-ECCOMAS 2020, to appear (2021). https://doi.org/
10.5281/zenodo.3902900
14. D. Westerståhl, The traditional square of opposition and generalized quantifiers. Stud. Logic
(Beijing) 2, 1–18 (2008)
15. D. Westerståhl, Classical vs. modern squares of opposition, and beyond, in The Square of
Opposition: A General Framework for Cognition, ed. by J.Y. Béziau, G. Payette (Switzerland,
Peter Lang, Bern, 2012), pp. 195–229
16. F. Berto, M. Plebani, Ontology and Metaontology (Bloomsbury, London, UK, 2015)
17. M. Huth, M. Ryan, Logic in Computer Science: Modelling and Reasoning about Systems, 2nd
edn. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004)
18. B. Smith, Mereotopology: a theory of parts and boundaries. Data Knowl. Eng. 20(3), 287–303
(1996)
19. B. Smith, A.C. Varzi, Fiat and bona fide boundaries. Philos. Phenomenol. Res. 60(2), 103–119
(2000)
20. CEN-CENELEC Management Centre, Materials modelling: terminology, classification and
metadata, in CEN Workshop Agreement 17284 (Belgium, Brussels, 2018)
21. M.T. Horsch, C. Niethammer, G. Boccardo, P. Carbone, S. Chiacchiera, M. Chiricotto, J.D.
Elliott, V. Lobaskin, P. Neumann, P. Schiffels, M.A. Seaton, I.T. Todorov, J. Vrabec, W.L.
Cavalcanti, Semantic interoperability and characterization of data provenance in computational
molecular engineering. J. Chem. Eng. Data 65(3), 1313–1329 (2020)
22. B. Hu, B. Hu, Tower of Babel: Interoperability of ontologies for pervasive computing, in First
International Symposium on Pervasive Computing and Applications, ed. by V. Callaghan, B.
Hu, Z. Lin, H. Zhang (IEEE, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA, 2006), pp. 690–695
23. A. Iliadis, The tower of Babel problem: making data make sense with basic formal ontology.
Online Inf. Rev. 43(6), 1021–1045 (2019)
24. C.H. Asuncion, M.J. van Sunderen, Pragmatic interoperability: a systematic review of published
definitions, in Proceedings of EAI2N, WCC 2010, ed. by P. Bernus, G. Doumeingts, M. Fox
(Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 2010), pp. 164–175
25. M.T. Horsch, S. Chiacchiera, M.A. Seaton, I.T. Todorov, B. Schembera, P. Klein, N.A. Konchakova, Pragmatic interoperability and translation of industrial engineering problems into
modelling and simulation solutions, in Proceedings of DAMDID 2020, to appear (2021). https://
doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3902873