References
91
26. B. Schembera, J.M. Durán, Dark data as the new challenge for big data science and the introduction of the scientific data officer. Philos. Technol. 33, 93–115 (2020)
27. M. Schoop, A. de Moor, J. Dietz, The pragmatic web: a manifesto. Commun. ACM 49(5),
75–76 (2006)
28. Varzi A (2019) Ontology: from philosophy to innovation in materials and manufacturing.
Keynote address, in 2nd EU Workshop on Materials and Manufacturing Ontology, Brussels,
6th June 2019
29. N.F. Noy, Semantic integration: a survey of ontology-based approaches. SIGMOD Rec. 33(4),
65–70 (2004)
30. J. Euzenat, P. Shvaiko, Ontology Matching, 2nd edn. (Springer, Heidelberg, 2013)
31. B. Bouchou, C. Niang, Semantic mediator querying, in Proceedings of IDEAS ’14, ed. by A.M.
Almeida, J. Bernardino, E. Ferreira Gomes (ACM, New York, USA, 2014), pp 29–38
32. D. Lembo, R. Rosati, V. Santarelli, D.F. Savo, E. Thorstensen, (2017) Mapping repair in
ontology-based data access evolving systems, in Proceedings of IJCAI, IJCAI, ed. by C. Sierra
(San José, California, USA, 2017), pp. 1160–1166
33. G. Xiao, D. Calvanese, R. Kontchakov, D. Lembo, A. Poggi, R. Rosati, M. Zakharyaschev,
(2018) Ontology-based data access: a survey, in Proceedings of IJCAI, IJCAI, ed. by J. Lang,
(San José, California, USA, 2018), pp. 5511–5519
34. G. Fusco, L. Aversano, An approach for semantic integration of heterogeneous data sources.
PeerJ Comput. Sci. 6, e254 (2020). https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.254
35. P. Ochieng, S. Kyanda, A statistically-based ontology matching tool. Distrib. Parall. Databases
36, 195–217 (2018)
36. F.M. Suchanek, S. Abiteboul, P. Senellart, PARIS: probabilistic alignment of relations,
instances, and schema. Proc. VLDB Endow. 5(3), 157–168 (2011)
37. M. Koutraki, N. Preda, D. Vodislav, Online relation alignment for linked datasets, in Proceedings of ESWC 2017, ed. by E. Blomqvist, D. Maynard, A. Gangemi, R. Hoekstra, P. Hitzler,
O. Hartig (Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2017), pp. 152–168
38. L. Zhou, M. Cheatham, P. Hitzler, Towards association rule-based complex ontology alignment,
in Proceedings of JIST 2019, ed. by X. Wang, F.A. Lisi, G. Xiao, E. Botoeva, LNCS, vol. 10249
(Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2020), pp. 287–303
39. Y. Métivier, E. Sopena, Graph relabelling systems: a general overview. Comput. AI 16(2),
167–185 (1997)
40. B. König, D. Nolte, J. Padberg, A. Rensink, A tutorial on graph transformation, in Graph
Transformation, Specifications, and Nets, ed. by R. Heckel, G. Taentzer, LNCS, vol. 12032
(Springer, Cham, 2018), pp. 83–104
41. D. Allemang, J. Hendler, Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist, 2nd edn. (Morgan Kaufmann, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA, 2011)
42. M.T. Horsch, S. Chiacchiera, M.A. Seaton, I.T. Todorov, R. Kunze, G. Summer, A. Fiseni, B.
Andreon, A. Scotto Di Minico, E. Bayro Kaiser, G. Kanagalingam, S. Stephan, K.Šindelka,
M. Lísal, J. Díaz Brañas, I. Pagonabarraga, M. Chiricotto, J.D. Elliott, P. Carbone, D. Toti,
G. Mogni, G. Goldbeck, H. Brüning, P. Schiffels, W.L. Cavalcanti, Ontology-based semantic
interoperability on the virtual materials marketplace, in Proceedings of the ISWC 2020 Demos
and Industry Tracks, ed. by K. Taylor, R. Gonçalves, F. Lecue, J. Yan (CEUR-WS, Aachen,
2021), pp. 134–137. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3986825
43. S. Stephan, M.T. Horsch, J. Vrabec, H. Hasse, MolMod - an open access database of force
fields for molecular simulations of fluids. Mol. Sim. 45(10), 806–814 (2019)
44. Å. Ervik, A. Mejía, E.A. Müller, Bottled SAFT: a web app providing SAFT-γ Mie force field
parameters for thousands of molecular fluids. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 56(9), 1609–1614 (2016)
45. K. Stöbener, P. Klein, M. Horsch, K. Küfer, H. Hasse, Parametrization of two-center LennardJones plus point-quadrupole force field models by multicriteria optimization. Fluid Phase Equilib. 411, 33–42 (2016)
91
26. B. Schembera, J.M. Durán, Dark data as the new challenge for big data science and the introduction of the scientific data officer. Philos. Technol. 33, 93–115 (2020)
27. M. Schoop, A. de Moor, J. Dietz, The pragmatic web: a manifesto. Commun. ACM 49(5),
75–76 (2006)
28. Varzi A (2019) Ontology: from philosophy to innovation in materials and manufacturing.
Keynote address, in 2nd EU Workshop on Materials and Manufacturing Ontology, Brussels,
6th June 2019
29. N.F. Noy, Semantic integration: a survey of ontology-based approaches. SIGMOD Rec. 33(4),
65–70 (2004)
30. J. Euzenat, P. Shvaiko, Ontology Matching, 2nd edn. (Springer, Heidelberg, 2013)
31. B. Bouchou, C. Niang, Semantic mediator querying, in Proceedings of IDEAS ’14, ed. by A.M.
Almeida, J. Bernardino, E. Ferreira Gomes (ACM, New York, USA, 2014), pp 29–38
32. D. Lembo, R. Rosati, V. Santarelli, D.F. Savo, E. Thorstensen, (2017) Mapping repair in
ontology-based data access evolving systems, in Proceedings of IJCAI, IJCAI, ed. by C. Sierra
(San José, California, USA, 2017), pp. 1160–1166
33. G. Xiao, D. Calvanese, R. Kontchakov, D. Lembo, A. Poggi, R. Rosati, M. Zakharyaschev,
(2018) Ontology-based data access: a survey, in Proceedings of IJCAI, IJCAI, ed. by J. Lang,
(San José, California, USA, 2018), pp. 5511–5519
34. G. Fusco, L. Aversano, An approach for semantic integration of heterogeneous data sources.
PeerJ Comput. Sci. 6, e254 (2020). https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.254
35. P. Ochieng, S. Kyanda, A statistically-based ontology matching tool. Distrib. Parall. Databases
36, 195–217 (2018)
36. F.M. Suchanek, S. Abiteboul, P. Senellart, PARIS: probabilistic alignment of relations,
instances, and schema. Proc. VLDB Endow. 5(3), 157–168 (2011)
37. M. Koutraki, N. Preda, D. Vodislav, Online relation alignment for linked datasets, in Proceedings of ESWC 2017, ed. by E. Blomqvist, D. Maynard, A. Gangemi, R. Hoekstra, P. Hitzler,
O. Hartig (Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2017), pp. 152–168
38. L. Zhou, M. Cheatham, P. Hitzler, Towards association rule-based complex ontology alignment,
in Proceedings of JIST 2019, ed. by X. Wang, F.A. Lisi, G. Xiao, E. Botoeva, LNCS, vol. 10249
(Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2020), pp. 287–303
39. Y. Métivier, E. Sopena, Graph relabelling systems: a general overview. Comput. AI 16(2),
167–185 (1997)
40. B. König, D. Nolte, J. Padberg, A. Rensink, A tutorial on graph transformation, in Graph
Transformation, Specifications, and Nets, ed. by R. Heckel, G. Taentzer, LNCS, vol. 12032
(Springer, Cham, 2018), pp. 83–104
41. D. Allemang, J. Hendler, Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist, 2nd edn. (Morgan Kaufmann, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA, 2011)
42. M.T. Horsch, S. Chiacchiera, M.A. Seaton, I.T. Todorov, R. Kunze, G. Summer, A. Fiseni, B.
Andreon, A. Scotto Di Minico, E. Bayro Kaiser, G. Kanagalingam, S. Stephan, K.Šindelka,
M. Lísal, J. Díaz Brañas, I. Pagonabarraga, M. Chiricotto, J.D. Elliott, P. Carbone, D. Toti,
G. Mogni, G. Goldbeck, H. Brüning, P. Schiffels, W.L. Cavalcanti, Ontology-based semantic
interoperability on the virtual materials marketplace, in Proceedings of the ISWC 2020 Demos
and Industry Tracks, ed. by K. Taylor, R. Gonçalves, F. Lecue, J. Yan (CEUR-WS, Aachen,
2021), pp. 134–137. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3986825
43. S. Stephan, M.T. Horsch, J. Vrabec, H. Hasse, MolMod - an open access database of force
fields for molecular simulations of fluids. Mol. Sim. 45(10), 806–814 (2019)
44. Å. Ervik, A. Mejía, E.A. Müller, Bottled SAFT: a web app providing SAFT-γ Mie force field
parameters for thousands of molecular fluids. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 56(9), 1609–1614 (2016)
45. K. Stöbener, P. Klein, M. Horsch, K. Küfer, H. Hasse, Parametrization of two-center LennardJones plus point-quadrupole force field models by multicriteria optimization. Fluid Phase Equilib. 411, 33–42 (2016)