58
D. Tomaszewicz et al.
3,50
11,00
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0
0,01
0,02
0,03
0,04
0,05
0,06
0,07
0,08
0,09
Displacement [mm]
Force [kN]
destructive force - the result of the experiment
ANSYS - the result of numerical simulation
Fig. 18 Comparison of the results of the experimental tests and the numerical simulation of an
anchor bonded at an angle of 45° to the surface of the block model
Fig. 19 Comparison of the results of the experimental tests and the numerical simulation of an
anchor bonded at an angle of 45° to the surface of the block model
The value of the force destroying the connection is 11.00 kN. The value of the
final displacement in the first model reached 0.08 mm (Fig. 18), while in the second
model, it reached 0.09 mm (Fig. 19).
The block models of the first six elements were designed as the three-layer with
dimensions of 20 cm × 20 cm × 17 cm. These are respectively: a 5 cm thick texture
layer, a 6 cm thick foam polystyrene layer, and a 6 cm thick construction layer.
The last two block models were designed as a single-layer with dimensions of
30 cm × 20 cm × 6 cm due to the sharp angle of inclination (30°).
The last series of block models concerned single-layer models with an anchor
bonded at an angle of 30°. In the first model, the increase in strength took place
through the entire numerical simulation with a constant step of 1.50 kN, until reaching
the final destructive force of the bonded joint equal to 12.00 kN and a final displacement of 0.09 mm. Throughout the entire numerical procedure, the displacement value
increased by 0.01 mm from 1.50 kN to the end of the analysis (Fig. 20).
The second modeled block element generated more significant results, which
correspond to the results of the experimental tests. In this model, as in the first, the
steps and numerical procedure were identical. The breaking force step through the
entire simulation was 1.50 kN, and from the moment it was obtained there was also
a displacement that reached its apogee with a breaking force of 30.00 kN and had a
value of 0.33 mm (Fig. 21).
D. Tomaszewicz et al.
3,50
11,00
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0
0,01
0,02
0,03
0,04
0,05
0,06
0,07
0,08
0,09
Displacement [mm]
Force [kN]
destructive force - the result of the experiment
ANSYS - the result of numerical simulation
Fig. 18 Comparison of the results of the experimental tests and the numerical simulation of an
anchor bonded at an angle of 45° to the surface of the block model
Fig. 19 Comparison of the results of the experimental tests and the numerical simulation of an
anchor bonded at an angle of 45° to the surface of the block model
The value of the force destroying the connection is 11.00 kN. The value of the
final displacement in the first model reached 0.08 mm (Fig. 18), while in the second
model, it reached 0.09 mm (Fig. 19).
The block models of the first six elements were designed as the three-layer with
dimensions of 20 cm × 20 cm × 17 cm. These are respectively: a 5 cm thick texture
layer, a 6 cm thick foam polystyrene layer, and a 6 cm thick construction layer.
The last two block models were designed as a single-layer with dimensions of
30 cm × 20 cm × 6 cm due to the sharp angle of inclination (30°).
The last series of block models concerned single-layer models with an anchor
bonded at an angle of 30°. In the first model, the increase in strength took place
through the entire numerical simulation with a constant step of 1.50 kN, until reaching
the final destructive force of the bonded joint equal to 12.00 kN and a final displacement of 0.09 mm. Throughout the entire numerical procedure, the displacement value
increased by 0.01 mm from 1.50 kN to the end of the analysis (Fig. 20).
The second modeled block element generated more significant results, which
correspond to the results of the experimental tests. In this model, as in the first, the
steps and numerical procedure were identical. The breaking force step through the
entire simulation was 1.50 kN, and from the moment it was obtained there was also
a displacement that reached its apogee with a breaking force of 30.00 kN and had a
value of 0.33 mm (Fig. 21).