to Ukraine filing its memorial: the RBK Group report, for instance, only preceded
filing by four days.
211 The decision to halt exploitation thus indicates Russia’s
recognition of the potential effect of the tribunal’s determination.
Fig. 16.1 Sketch-map No. 9 from the ICJ’s judgment in Romania v. Ukraine, p. 133. Note the
Court’s comment at para. 218: ‘From Point 4 the boundary traces the line equidistant from the
opposite coasts of Romania and Ukraine until Point 5’ [emphasis added]
211 Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine, Press Release of 19 February 2018: http://mfa.gov.ua/en/
press-center/news/63052-zajava-mzs-ukrajini-shhodo-podachi-ukrajinoju-memorandumu-varbitrazhnomu-provadzhenni-proti-rf-za-konvencijeju-oon-z-morsykogo-prava.
312
G. Kynaston and R. Brown
filing by four days.
211 The decision to halt exploitation thus indicates Russia’s
recognition of the potential effect of the tribunal’s determination.
Fig. 16.1 Sketch-map No. 9 from the ICJ’s judgment in Romania v. Ukraine, p. 133. Note the
Court’s comment at para. 218: ‘From Point 4 the boundary traces the line equidistant from the
opposite coasts of Romania and Ukraine until Point 5’ [emphasis added]
211 Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine, Press Release of 19 February 2018: http://mfa.gov.ua/en/
press-center/news/63052-zajava-mzs-ukrajini-shhodo-podachi-ukrajinoju-memorandumu-varbitrazhnomu-provadzhenni-proti-rf-za-konvencijeju-oon-z-morsykogo-prava.
312
G. Kynaston and R. Brown