59. Lancaster Unity, ‘‘German Police Raid Homes in Far-Right Internet Probe,’’ February 28, 2008,
http://lancasteruaf.blogspot.com/2008/02/german-police-raid-homes-in-far-right.html.
60. Wikipedia, ‘‘Laws against Holocaust Denial,’’ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laws_against
_Holocaust_denial.
61. Ian Brown, ‘‘Internet Censorship: Be Careful What You Ask For,’’ Proceedings of the International Conference on Communication, Mass Media and Culture, Istanbul, October 2006.
62. CNN.com, ‘‘Yahoo! Loses Nazi Auction Case,’’ November 20, 2000, http://archives.cnn.com/
2000/TECH/computing/11/20/france.yahoo.02/.
63. Heise Online, ‘‘Revisionsverhandlung Gegen Netzaktivisten Steht An’’ [Revision Negotiation against Net Activists Lines Up], April 19, 2004, http://www.heise.de/newsticker/
Revisionsverhandlung-gegen-Netzaktivisten-steht-an–/meldung/72134.
64. Consumer Project on Technology, ‘‘CPT’s Page on Defamation and Libel Cases,’’ http://
www.cptech.org/ecom/jurisdiction/defamation2.html.
65. Florian Ro ¨tzer, ‘‘Update: Leugnung des Holocaust im Internet Nach Deutschem Recht Strafbar,’’ Telepolis, December, 13, 2000, http://www.heise.de/tp/r4/artikel/4/4467/1.html.
66. [1999] 4 All ER 342, [2001] QB 201 (QBD).
67. 1996, c. 36, sec. 1 (Eng.).
68. Yaman Akdeniz, ‘‘Case Analysis of Laurence Godfrey v. Demon Internet Limited,’’ 1999, http://
www.cyber-rights.org/reports/demon.htm; Consumer Project on Technology, ‘‘CPT’s Page on
Defamation and Libel Cases,’’ http://www.cptech.org/ecom/jurisdiction/defamation2.html.
69. The text of the law states, ‘‘Anybody who publishes a daily newspaper or a periodical without
registration or with registration suspended is subject to a fine penalty or the restriction of liberty.’’
Article 45, Polish Press Law Act of January 26, 1984.
70. Tomasz Rychlicki and Piotr Waglowski, ‘‘Polish Courts Say Websites Should Be Registered As
Press,’’ Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, 2009, 15(1), 9–14, http://prawo.vagla.pl/
node/8306.
71. Joanna Kulesza, ‘‘Which Legal Standards Should Apply to Web-logs? The present legal position of Internet journals in the European jurisprudence in the light of the European Parliament
Committee’s on Culture and Education report and Polish Supreme Court decision,’’ Lex Electronica, Vol. 13, no. 3 (Winter 2009), http://www.lex-electronica.org/fr/resumes_complets/221.html.
72. European Digital Rights, ‘‘MEPs Support Again the Rules on Defamation in Rome II,’’ February, 14, 2007, http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number5.3/romeII.
73. Directive 2006/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of March 15, 2006, on
the retention of data generated or processed in connection with the provision of publicly available
electronic communications services or of public communications networks and amending Directive 2002/58/EC.
Europe Overview
295
http://lancasteruaf.blogspot.com/2008/02/german-police-raid-homes-in-far-right.html.
60. Wikipedia, ‘‘Laws against Holocaust Denial,’’ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laws_against
_Holocaust_denial.
61. Ian Brown, ‘‘Internet Censorship: Be Careful What You Ask For,’’ Proceedings of the International Conference on Communication, Mass Media and Culture, Istanbul, October 2006.
62. CNN.com, ‘‘Yahoo! Loses Nazi Auction Case,’’ November 20, 2000, http://archives.cnn.com/
2000/TECH/computing/11/20/france.yahoo.02/.
63. Heise Online, ‘‘Revisionsverhandlung Gegen Netzaktivisten Steht An’’ [Revision Negotiation against Net Activists Lines Up], April 19, 2004, http://www.heise.de/newsticker/
Revisionsverhandlung-gegen-Netzaktivisten-steht-an–/meldung/72134.
64. Consumer Project on Technology, ‘‘CPT’s Page on Defamation and Libel Cases,’’ http://
www.cptech.org/ecom/jurisdiction/defamation2.html.
65. Florian Ro ¨tzer, ‘‘Update: Leugnung des Holocaust im Internet Nach Deutschem Recht Strafbar,’’ Telepolis, December, 13, 2000, http://www.heise.de/tp/r4/artikel/4/4467/1.html.
66. [1999] 4 All ER 342, [2001] QB 201 (QBD).
67. 1996, c. 36, sec. 1 (Eng.).
68. Yaman Akdeniz, ‘‘Case Analysis of Laurence Godfrey v. Demon Internet Limited,’’ 1999, http://
www.cyber-rights.org/reports/demon.htm; Consumer Project on Technology, ‘‘CPT’s Page on
Defamation and Libel Cases,’’ http://www.cptech.org/ecom/jurisdiction/defamation2.html.
69. The text of the law states, ‘‘Anybody who publishes a daily newspaper or a periodical without
registration or with registration suspended is subject to a fine penalty or the restriction of liberty.’’
Article 45, Polish Press Law Act of January 26, 1984.
70. Tomasz Rychlicki and Piotr Waglowski, ‘‘Polish Courts Say Websites Should Be Registered As
Press,’’ Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, 2009, 15(1), 9–14, http://prawo.vagla.pl/
node/8306.
71. Joanna Kulesza, ‘‘Which Legal Standards Should Apply to Web-logs? The present legal position of Internet journals in the European jurisprudence in the light of the European Parliament
Committee’s on Culture and Education report and Polish Supreme Court decision,’’ Lex Electronica, Vol. 13, no. 3 (Winter 2009), http://www.lex-electronica.org/fr/resumes_complets/221.html.
72. European Digital Rights, ‘‘MEPs Support Again the Rules on Defamation in Rome II,’’ February, 14, 2007, http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number5.3/romeII.
73. Directive 2006/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of March 15, 2006, on
the retention of data generated or processed in connection with the provision of publicly available
electronic communications services or of public communications networks and amending Directive 2002/58/EC.
Europe Overview
295