after the signature of the United Nations Convention on the law of the sea: the protection of the
environment and the future of the law of the sea. Coimbra Editora, Coimbra
Beckman R, Davenport T (2012) The EEZ regime: reflections after 30 years. In: Proceedings from
the LOSI-KIOST Conference on Securing the Ocean for the Next Generation, pp 1–41
Ben-Yami M (2017) The 200-mile limit’s origins. World Fishing and Aquaculture, 29 August 2017.
https://www.worldfishing.net/news101/Comment/ben-yami/the-200-mile-limits-origin.
Accessed 13 Apr 2020
Borgese EM (1968) The ocean regime: a suggested statute for the peaceful uses of the high seas and
the sea-bed beyond the limits of national jurisdiction. A Center Occasional Paper vol 1, no.
5. Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions, Santa Barbara, California
Brown ED (1982) Freedom of the high seas versus the common heritage of mankind: fundamental
principles in conflict. San Diego Law Rev 20:521–560
Chircop A (2011) Managing adjacency: some legal aspects of the relationship between the extended
continental shelf and the international seabed Area. Ocean Dev Int Law 42(4):307–316
Creamer R (1968) Title to the deep seabed: prospects for the future. Harv Int Law J 9:205–231
Donoghue T (2012) Statement of Thomas J. Donoghue: The Law of the Sea Convention: Perspectives from Business and Industry. Testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee,
28 June
Finley LW (1969) The outer limit of the continental shelf: a rejoinder to professor Louis Henkin.
Am J Int Law 64(1):42–61
Franckx E (2010) The international seabed authority and the common heritage of mankind: the need
for states to establish the outer limits of their continental shelf. Int J Mar Coast Law 25
(4):543–567
Friedmann W (1971) Selden redivivus: towards a partition of the seas? Am J Int Law 65
(5):757–770
Galindo GRB (2006) Quem diz humanidade, pretende enganar? Internacionalistas e os usos da
noção de patrimônio comum da humanidade aplicada aos fundos marinhos (1967–1994). PhD
Dissertation, Universidade de Brasília
Garcia-Amador FV (1974) The Latin American contribution to the development of the law of the
sea. Am J Int Law 68(1):33–50
Gavouneli M (2007) Functional jurisdiction in the law of the sea. Publications on ocean development, vol 62. Nijhoff, Leiden
Henkin L (1969) International law and ‘the interests’: the law of the seabed. Am J Int Law 63
(3):504–510
Infante MT (1984) The settlement of disputes regarding the law of the sea and its bearing on the
legal nature of the exclusive economic zone. In: Vicuña FO (ed) The exclusive economic zone: a
Latin American perspective. Taylor and Francis Group, pp 166–167
Johnson LB (1966) 2 Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents, 13 July
Keohane RO, Nye JS (1977) Power and interdependence: world politics in transition. Little Brown
& Co, Boston
Kreca M (2002) A few remarks on the theoretical basis of the new law of the sea. In: Liber
Amicorum Judge Shigeru Oda, vol II. Nijhoff, Leiden, pp 1207–1216
Kwiatkowska B (1989) The 200-mile exclusive economic zone in the new law of the sea. Nijhoff,
Dordrecht
Kwiatkowska B (1991) Creeping jurisdiction beyond 200 miles in the light of the 1982 law of the
sea convention and state practice. Ocean Dev Int Law 22(2):153–187
Leanza U, Caracciolo M C (2014) The exclusive economic zone. In: Attard D, Fitzmaurice M,
Martinez NA (eds) The IMLI manual on international maritime law, vol I: the law of the sea.
Oxford University Press, Oxford
McDorman TL (2015) The continental shelf. In: The Oxford handbook of the law of the sea. Oxford
University Press, Oxford
Molenaar EJ (2015) Port and coastal states. In: The Oxford handbook of the law of the sea. Oxford
University Press, Oxford, pp 280–303
References
137
environment and the future of the law of the sea. Coimbra Editora, Coimbra
Beckman R, Davenport T (2012) The EEZ regime: reflections after 30 years. In: Proceedings from
the LOSI-KIOST Conference on Securing the Ocean for the Next Generation, pp 1–41
Ben-Yami M (2017) The 200-mile limit’s origins. World Fishing and Aquaculture, 29 August 2017.
https://www.worldfishing.net/news101/Comment/ben-yami/the-200-mile-limits-origin.
Accessed 13 Apr 2020
Borgese EM (1968) The ocean regime: a suggested statute for the peaceful uses of the high seas and
the sea-bed beyond the limits of national jurisdiction. A Center Occasional Paper vol 1, no.
5. Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions, Santa Barbara, California
Brown ED (1982) Freedom of the high seas versus the common heritage of mankind: fundamental
principles in conflict. San Diego Law Rev 20:521–560
Chircop A (2011) Managing adjacency: some legal aspects of the relationship between the extended
continental shelf and the international seabed Area. Ocean Dev Int Law 42(4):307–316
Creamer R (1968) Title to the deep seabed: prospects for the future. Harv Int Law J 9:205–231
Donoghue T (2012) Statement of Thomas J. Donoghue: The Law of the Sea Convention: Perspectives from Business and Industry. Testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee,
28 June
Finley LW (1969) The outer limit of the continental shelf: a rejoinder to professor Louis Henkin.
Am J Int Law 64(1):42–61
Franckx E (2010) The international seabed authority and the common heritage of mankind: the need
for states to establish the outer limits of their continental shelf. Int J Mar Coast Law 25
(4):543–567
Friedmann W (1971) Selden redivivus: towards a partition of the seas? Am J Int Law 65
(5):757–770
Galindo GRB (2006) Quem diz humanidade, pretende enganar? Internacionalistas e os usos da
noção de patrimônio comum da humanidade aplicada aos fundos marinhos (1967–1994). PhD
Dissertation, Universidade de Brasília
Garcia-Amador FV (1974) The Latin American contribution to the development of the law of the
sea. Am J Int Law 68(1):33–50
Gavouneli M (2007) Functional jurisdiction in the law of the sea. Publications on ocean development, vol 62. Nijhoff, Leiden
Henkin L (1969) International law and ‘the interests’: the law of the seabed. Am J Int Law 63
(3):504–510
Infante MT (1984) The settlement of disputes regarding the law of the sea and its bearing on the
legal nature of the exclusive economic zone. In: Vicuña FO (ed) The exclusive economic zone: a
Latin American perspective. Taylor and Francis Group, pp 166–167
Johnson LB (1966) 2 Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents, 13 July
Keohane RO, Nye JS (1977) Power and interdependence: world politics in transition. Little Brown
& Co, Boston
Kreca M (2002) A few remarks on the theoretical basis of the new law of the sea. In: Liber
Amicorum Judge Shigeru Oda, vol II. Nijhoff, Leiden, pp 1207–1216
Kwiatkowska B (1989) The 200-mile exclusive economic zone in the new law of the sea. Nijhoff,
Dordrecht
Kwiatkowska B (1991) Creeping jurisdiction beyond 200 miles in the light of the 1982 law of the
sea convention and state practice. Ocean Dev Int Law 22(2):153–187
Leanza U, Caracciolo M C (2014) The exclusive economic zone. In: Attard D, Fitzmaurice M,
Martinez NA (eds) The IMLI manual on international maritime law, vol I: the law of the sea.
Oxford University Press, Oxford
McDorman TL (2015) The continental shelf. In: The Oxford handbook of the law of the sea. Oxford
University Press, Oxford
Molenaar EJ (2015) Port and coastal states. In: The Oxford handbook of the law of the sea. Oxford
University Press, Oxford, pp 280–303
References
137