Nanoporous Polymeric Membranes for Hydrogen Separation
375
72. Rahimpour MR, Samimi F, Babapoor A et al (2017) Palladium membranes applications
in reaction systems for hydrogen separation and purification: a review. Chem Eng Process
Process Intensif 121:24–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2017.07.021
73. Robeson LM (1991) Correlation of separation factor versus permeability for polymeric
membranes. J Memb Sci 62:165–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(91)80060-J
74. Sadilov IS, Petukhov DI, Eliseev AA (2019) Enhancing gas separation efficiency by surface
functionalization of nanoporous membranes. Sep Purif Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
seppur.2019.03.078
75. Sadykov VA, Krasnov AV, Fedorova YE et al (2018) Novel nanocomposite materials for
oxygen and hydrogen separation membranes. Int J Hydrog Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
ijhydene.2018.02.182
76. Sanders DF, Smith ZP, Guo R et al (2013) Energy-efficient polymeric gas separation membranes for a sustainable future: a review. Polymer (Guildf) 54:4729–4761. https://doi.org/10.
1016/J.POLYMER.2013.05.075
77. Sanip SM, Ismail AF, Goh PS et al (2011) Gas separation properties of functionalized carbon
nanotubes mixed matrix membranes. Sep Purif Technol 78:208–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/
J.SEPPUR.2011.02.003
78. Segalman RA (2005) Patterning with block copolymer thin films. Mater Sci Eng R Rep
48:191–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2004.12.003
79. Sharma A, Kumar S, Tripathi B et al (2009) Aligned CNT/Polymer nanocomposite membranes for hydrogen separation. Int J Hydrog Energy 34:3977–3982. https://doi.org/10.1016/
J.IJHYDENE.2009.02.068
80. Sharma A, Tripathi B, Vijay YK (2010) Dramatic Improvement in properties of magnetically
aligned CNT/polymer nanocomposites. J Memb Sci 361:89–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
memsci.2010.06.005
81. Sharma A, Vijay YK (2012) Effect of electric field variation in alignment of SWNT/PC
nanocomposites. Int J Hydrog Energy 37:3945–3948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.
2011.03.166
82. Shi Z, Wu S, Szpunar JA, Roshd M (2006) An observation of palladium membrane formation
on a porous stainless steel substrate by electroless deposition. J Memb Sci 280:705–711
83. Shimekit B, Mukhtar H, Murugesan T (2011) Prediction of the relative permeability of gases
in mixed matrix membranes. J Memb Sci 373:152–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.
2011.02.038
84. Sirelkhatim A, Mahmud S, Seeni A et al (2015) Review on zinc oxide nanoparticles:
antibacterial activity and toxicity mechanism. Nano-Micro Lett 7:219–242
85. Song N, Gao X, Ma Z et al (2018) A review of graphene-based separation membrane: materials, characteristics, preparation and applications. Desalination 437:59–72. https://doi.org/10.
1016/J.DESAL.2018.02.024
86. Sridhar S, Bee S, Bhargava SK (2014) Membrane-based gas separation : principle, applications
and future potential. 1–25
87. Sudowe R, Vater W, Ensinger W et al (1999) Basic research on nuclear track microfilters for
gas separation. Radiat Meas 31:691–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4487(99)00179-1
88. Sun M, Li J (2018) Graphene oxide membranes: functional structures, preparation and
environmental applications. Nano Today 20:121–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2018.
04.007
89. Swain SS, Unnikrishnan L, Mohanty S, Nayak SK (2017) Carbon nanotubes as potential
candidate for separation of H 2 CO 2 gas pairs. Int J Hydrog Energy 42:29283–29299. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.09.152
90. Tao Y, Xue Q, Liu Z et al (2014) Tunable hydrogen separation in porous graphene membrane:
first-principle and molecular dynamic simulation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:8048–8058.
https://doi.org/10.1021/am4058887
91. Tersoff J, Ruoff RS (1994) Structural properties of a carbon-nanotube crystal. Phys Rev Lett
73:676–679. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.73.676
375
72. Rahimpour MR, Samimi F, Babapoor A et al (2017) Palladium membranes applications
in reaction systems for hydrogen separation and purification: a review. Chem Eng Process
Process Intensif 121:24–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2017.07.021
73. Robeson LM (1991) Correlation of separation factor versus permeability for polymeric
membranes. J Memb Sci 62:165–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(91)80060-J
74. Sadilov IS, Petukhov DI, Eliseev AA (2019) Enhancing gas separation efficiency by surface
functionalization of nanoporous membranes. Sep Purif Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
seppur.2019.03.078
75. Sadykov VA, Krasnov AV, Fedorova YE et al (2018) Novel nanocomposite materials for
oxygen and hydrogen separation membranes. Int J Hydrog Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
ijhydene.2018.02.182
76. Sanders DF, Smith ZP, Guo R et al (2013) Energy-efficient polymeric gas separation membranes for a sustainable future: a review. Polymer (Guildf) 54:4729–4761. https://doi.org/10.
1016/J.POLYMER.2013.05.075
77. Sanip SM, Ismail AF, Goh PS et al (2011) Gas separation properties of functionalized carbon
nanotubes mixed matrix membranes. Sep Purif Technol 78:208–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/
J.SEPPUR.2011.02.003
78. Segalman RA (2005) Patterning with block copolymer thin films. Mater Sci Eng R Rep
48:191–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2004.12.003
79. Sharma A, Kumar S, Tripathi B et al (2009) Aligned CNT/Polymer nanocomposite membranes for hydrogen separation. Int J Hydrog Energy 34:3977–3982. https://doi.org/10.1016/
J.IJHYDENE.2009.02.068
80. Sharma A, Tripathi B, Vijay YK (2010) Dramatic Improvement in properties of magnetically
aligned CNT/polymer nanocomposites. J Memb Sci 361:89–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
memsci.2010.06.005
81. Sharma A, Vijay YK (2012) Effect of electric field variation in alignment of SWNT/PC
nanocomposites. Int J Hydrog Energy 37:3945–3948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.
2011.03.166
82. Shi Z, Wu S, Szpunar JA, Roshd M (2006) An observation of palladium membrane formation
on a porous stainless steel substrate by electroless deposition. J Memb Sci 280:705–711
83. Shimekit B, Mukhtar H, Murugesan T (2011) Prediction of the relative permeability of gases
in mixed matrix membranes. J Memb Sci 373:152–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.
2011.02.038
84. Sirelkhatim A, Mahmud S, Seeni A et al (2015) Review on zinc oxide nanoparticles:
antibacterial activity and toxicity mechanism. Nano-Micro Lett 7:219–242
85. Song N, Gao X, Ma Z et al (2018) A review of graphene-based separation membrane: materials, characteristics, preparation and applications. Desalination 437:59–72. https://doi.org/10.
1016/J.DESAL.2018.02.024
86. Sridhar S, Bee S, Bhargava SK (2014) Membrane-based gas separation : principle, applications
and future potential. 1–25
87. Sudowe R, Vater W, Ensinger W et al (1999) Basic research on nuclear track microfilters for
gas separation. Radiat Meas 31:691–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4487(99)00179-1
88. Sun M, Li J (2018) Graphene oxide membranes: functional structures, preparation and
environmental applications. Nano Today 20:121–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2018.
04.007
89. Swain SS, Unnikrishnan L, Mohanty S, Nayak SK (2017) Carbon nanotubes as potential
candidate for separation of H 2 CO 2 gas pairs. Int J Hydrog Energy 42:29283–29299. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.09.152
90. Tao Y, Xue Q, Liu Z et al (2014) Tunable hydrogen separation in porous graphene membrane:
first-principle and molecular dynamic simulation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:8048–8058.
https://doi.org/10.1021/am4058887
91. Tersoff J, Ruoff RS (1994) Structural properties of a carbon-nanotube crystal. Phys Rev Lett
73:676–679. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.73.676