222
in the Chagos Marine Protected Area Arbitration in March 2015, no decision to
terminate the Agreement has been taken and therefore it will continue until 30
December 2036.
135
References
Abraham G (2011) Paradise claimed: disputed sovereignty over the Chagos Archipelago. S Afr
Law J 128:63–99
Aksenova M, Burke C (2017) The Chagos Islands award: exploring the renewed role of the law of
the sea in the post-colonial context. Wis Int Law J 35:1–38
Alexandre C, Koutouki K (2014) Les déplacés des Chagos. Retour sur la lutte de ces habitants pour
récupérer leur terre ancestrale. Revue québécoise de droit international 27:1–26
Allen S (2008) International law and the resettlement of the (outer) Chagos Islands. Hum Rights
Law Rev 8:683–702
Allen S (2014) The Chagos Islanders and international law. Hart, Oxford/Portland
Appleby T (2015) The Chagos marine protected arbitration. a battle of four losers? J Environ Law
27:529–540
Biad A, Edynak E (2016) L’arbitrage relatif à l’aire marine protégée des Chagos (Maurice c.
Royaume-Uni) du 18 mars 2015: une décision prudente pour un litige complexe. Revue québécoise de droit international 29:55–83
Boyle A (1997) Dispute settlement and the law of the sea convention: problems of fragmentation
and jurisdiction. Int Comp Law Q 46:37–54
Buga I (2012) Territorial sovereignty issues in maritime disputes: a jurisdictional dilemma for law
of the sea tribunals. Int J Mar Coast Law 27:59–95
Colson D, Vohrer B (2015) In Re Chagos marine protected area (Mauritius v. United Kingdom).
PCA Case No. 2011–3. Am J Int Law 109:845–851
Crosato Neumann A (2015) Sovereignty disputes under UNCLOS: some thoughts and remarks on
the Chagos Marine Protected Area dispute. www.cilj.co.uk
Di Lieto A (2017) L’arcipelago Chagos: vecchio e nuovo colonialismo. In: Triggiani E, Cherubini
F, Ingravallo I, Nalin E, Virzo R (eds) Dialoghi con Ugo Villani. Cacucci Editore, Bari,
pp 299–306
Klein N (2016) Expansions and restrictions in the UNCLOS dispute settlement regime: lessons
from recent decisions. Chin J Int Law 15:403–415
Lunn J (2013) Disputes over the British Indian Ocean Territory: a survey. http://researchbriefings.
parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/RP13-31
Lunn J (2017) Disputes over the British Indian Ocean Territory: July 2017 update. http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/SN06908
Mendelson M (1998) The formation of customary international law. Recueil des Cours de
l’Académie de la Haye 272:155–410
Milano E (2006) Unlawful territorial situations in international law. Reconciling effectiveness,
legality and legitimacy. Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden
Nguyen LN (2016) The Chagos Marine Protected Area Arbitration: has the scope of LOSC compulsory jurisdiction been clarified? Int J Mar Coast Law 31:120–143
135 The expectation has thus not been met that, after the Award in the Chagos Marine Protected
Area Arbitration, the United Kingdom would have found “it difficult to avoid engaging in serious
consultations with Mauritius on the renewal of the lease of Diego Garcia to the United States in
2016”. Such an expectation was expressed by Waibel (2015).
M. Gervasi
in the Chagos Marine Protected Area Arbitration in March 2015, no decision to
terminate the Agreement has been taken and therefore it will continue until 30
December 2036.
135
References
Abraham G (2011) Paradise claimed: disputed sovereignty over the Chagos Archipelago. S Afr
Law J 128:63–99
Aksenova M, Burke C (2017) The Chagos Islands award: exploring the renewed role of the law of
the sea in the post-colonial context. Wis Int Law J 35:1–38
Alexandre C, Koutouki K (2014) Les déplacés des Chagos. Retour sur la lutte de ces habitants pour
récupérer leur terre ancestrale. Revue québécoise de droit international 27:1–26
Allen S (2008) International law and the resettlement of the (outer) Chagos Islands. Hum Rights
Law Rev 8:683–702
Allen S (2014) The Chagos Islanders and international law. Hart, Oxford/Portland
Appleby T (2015) The Chagos marine protected arbitration. a battle of four losers? J Environ Law
27:529–540
Biad A, Edynak E (2016) L’arbitrage relatif à l’aire marine protégée des Chagos (Maurice c.
Royaume-Uni) du 18 mars 2015: une décision prudente pour un litige complexe. Revue québécoise de droit international 29:55–83
Boyle A (1997) Dispute settlement and the law of the sea convention: problems of fragmentation
and jurisdiction. Int Comp Law Q 46:37–54
Buga I (2012) Territorial sovereignty issues in maritime disputes: a jurisdictional dilemma for law
of the sea tribunals. Int J Mar Coast Law 27:59–95
Colson D, Vohrer B (2015) In Re Chagos marine protected area (Mauritius v. United Kingdom).
PCA Case No. 2011–3. Am J Int Law 109:845–851
Crosato Neumann A (2015) Sovereignty disputes under UNCLOS: some thoughts and remarks on
the Chagos Marine Protected Area dispute. www.cilj.co.uk
Di Lieto A (2017) L’arcipelago Chagos: vecchio e nuovo colonialismo. In: Triggiani E, Cherubini
F, Ingravallo I, Nalin E, Virzo R (eds) Dialoghi con Ugo Villani. Cacucci Editore, Bari,
pp 299–306
Klein N (2016) Expansions and restrictions in the UNCLOS dispute settlement regime: lessons
from recent decisions. Chin J Int Law 15:403–415
Lunn J (2013) Disputes over the British Indian Ocean Territory: a survey. http://researchbriefings.
parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/RP13-31
Lunn J (2017) Disputes over the British Indian Ocean Territory: July 2017 update. http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/SN06908
Mendelson M (1998) The formation of customary international law. Recueil des Cours de
l’Académie de la Haye 272:155–410
Milano E (2006) Unlawful territorial situations in international law. Reconciling effectiveness,
legality and legitimacy. Martinus Nijhoff, Leiden
Nguyen LN (2016) The Chagos Marine Protected Area Arbitration: has the scope of LOSC compulsory jurisdiction been clarified? Int J Mar Coast Law 31:120–143
135 The expectation has thus not been met that, after the Award in the Chagos Marine Protected
Area Arbitration, the United Kingdom would have found “it difficult to avoid engaging in serious
consultations with Mauritius on the renewal of the lease of Diego Garcia to the United States in
2016”. Such an expectation was expressed by Waibel (2015).
M. Gervasi