Water Footprint in Leather Tanning and Steel Production
155
References
1. Lafrano G, Meric S, Zengin GE, Orhon D (2013) Chemical and biological treatment technologiesfor leather tannery chemicals and wastewaters: a review. Sci Total Environ, 461–462,
265–281
2. UN-FAO (2013) World statistical compedium for raw hides and skins, leather and leather
footwear 1993–2012, Trande and, 193
3. UNESCO (2015) The united nations world water development report. The United Nations
Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
4. International Standard, ISO 14046 (2014) Environmental management-water footprintprinciples, requirements and guidelines, International Organization for Standardization,
Geneva, Switzerland
5. Dixit S, Yadav A, Dwivedi PD, Das M (2015) Toxic hazards of leather industry and technologies
to combat threat: a review. J Clean Prod 87:39–49
6. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2015) World statistical
compendium for raw hides and skins, leather and leather footwear 1998–2014. I4651E/1/05.15.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome
7. Giaccherini F, Munz G, Dockhorn T, Lubello C, Rosso D (2017) Carbon and energy footprint
analysis of tannery wastewater treatment: a global overviem. Water Resour Ind 17:43–52
8. Beghetoto V, Zancanaro A, Matteoli U, Pozza G (2013) The leather industry: a chemistry
insight part I: an overview of the industrial process
9. Jin J, Mulesa L, Rouillet MM (2017) Trace elements in parental nutrition; Considerations for
the prescribing clinician. Nutrients 9:440
10. Yan J, Huang H, Liu Z, Shen J, Ni J, Han J, Jin L (2020) Hedgehog signalling pathway regulates
hexavalent chromium induced liver fibrosis by activation of hepatic stallate cells. Toxixol Lett
320:1–8
11. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2015) World statistical
compendium for raw hides and skins, leather and leather footwear 1998–2014. I4651E/1/05.15.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome
12. Jerry S (2011) Environmental production and public health issues, 88. Leather, fur and
footwear. In: McCann M, Stellman JM (eds) Encyclopaedia of occupational health and safety.
International Labor Organization, Geneva
13. Shakir L, Ejaz S, Ashraf M, Qureshi NA, Anjum AA, Iltaf I, Javeed A (2012) Ecotoxicological
risks associated with tannery effluent wastewater. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 34(2):180–191
14. EPA. Prevention pesticides & toxic substances, EPA – 738 – F- 98e00, United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1998. Ortho-phenylphenol (OPP) & sodium ortho-phenylphenate
(SOPP) risk characterization document, 2007, Dieteray Exposure Health Assessment Section,
Medical Toxicology Branch, Department of Pesticide Regulation
15. Louis ED, Jurewicz EC (2003) Applegate. In: Factor-Litvak P, Parides M, Andrews L, Todd
A (eds) Association between essential tremor and blood lead concentration. Environ Health
Perspect 285:915–920
16. Hoekstra AY (2017) Water footprint assessment: evolvement of a new research field. Water
Resour Manage 31:3061–3081
17. OECD (2012) Environmental outlook to 2050: the consequences of inaction. Organization for
Economic Co-Operation and Development, Paris, France
18. Gu Y, Xu J, Keller AA, Yuan D, Li Y, Zhang B, Weng Q, Xiaolei Z, Deng P, Wang H, Li F
(2015) Calculation of water footprint of the iron and steel industry: a case study in Eastern
China. J Cle Prod, 1–8
19. Gajdzik B, Gawlik R, Skoczypiec S (2018) Forecasting-scenario-heuristic method proposal
for assessment of feasibility of steel production scenarios in Poland—Managerial implications
for production engineering. Arch Civ Mech Eng 18:1651–1660
20. Gerbens-Leenes PW, Hoekstra AY, Bosman R (2018) The blue and grey water footprint of
construction materials: steel, cement and glass. Water Resour Ind 19:1–12
155
References
1. Lafrano G, Meric S, Zengin GE, Orhon D (2013) Chemical and biological treatment technologiesfor leather tannery chemicals and wastewaters: a review. Sci Total Environ, 461–462,
265–281
2. UN-FAO (2013) World statistical compedium for raw hides and skins, leather and leather
footwear 1993–2012, Trande and, 193
3. UNESCO (2015) The united nations world water development report. The United Nations
Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
4. International Standard, ISO 14046 (2014) Environmental management-water footprintprinciples, requirements and guidelines, International Organization for Standardization,
Geneva, Switzerland
5. Dixit S, Yadav A, Dwivedi PD, Das M (2015) Toxic hazards of leather industry and technologies
to combat threat: a review. J Clean Prod 87:39–49
6. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2015) World statistical
compendium for raw hides and skins, leather and leather footwear 1998–2014. I4651E/1/05.15.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome
7. Giaccherini F, Munz G, Dockhorn T, Lubello C, Rosso D (2017) Carbon and energy footprint
analysis of tannery wastewater treatment: a global overviem. Water Resour Ind 17:43–52
8. Beghetoto V, Zancanaro A, Matteoli U, Pozza G (2013) The leather industry: a chemistry
insight part I: an overview of the industrial process
9. Jin J, Mulesa L, Rouillet MM (2017) Trace elements in parental nutrition; Considerations for
the prescribing clinician. Nutrients 9:440
10. Yan J, Huang H, Liu Z, Shen J, Ni J, Han J, Jin L (2020) Hedgehog signalling pathway regulates
hexavalent chromium induced liver fibrosis by activation of hepatic stallate cells. Toxixol Lett
320:1–8
11. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2015) World statistical
compendium for raw hides and skins, leather and leather footwear 1998–2014. I4651E/1/05.15.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome
12. Jerry S (2011) Environmental production and public health issues, 88. Leather, fur and
footwear. In: McCann M, Stellman JM (eds) Encyclopaedia of occupational health and safety.
International Labor Organization, Geneva
13. Shakir L, Ejaz S, Ashraf M, Qureshi NA, Anjum AA, Iltaf I, Javeed A (2012) Ecotoxicological
risks associated with tannery effluent wastewater. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 34(2):180–191
14. EPA. Prevention pesticides & toxic substances, EPA – 738 – F- 98e00, United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1998. Ortho-phenylphenol (OPP) & sodium ortho-phenylphenate
(SOPP) risk characterization document, 2007, Dieteray Exposure Health Assessment Section,
Medical Toxicology Branch, Department of Pesticide Regulation
15. Louis ED, Jurewicz EC (2003) Applegate. In: Factor-Litvak P, Parides M, Andrews L, Todd
A (eds) Association between essential tremor and blood lead concentration. Environ Health
Perspect 285:915–920
16. Hoekstra AY (2017) Water footprint assessment: evolvement of a new research field. Water
Resour Manage 31:3061–3081
17. OECD (2012) Environmental outlook to 2050: the consequences of inaction. Organization for
Economic Co-Operation and Development, Paris, France
18. Gu Y, Xu J, Keller AA, Yuan D, Li Y, Zhang B, Weng Q, Xiaolei Z, Deng P, Wang H, Li F
(2015) Calculation of water footprint of the iron and steel industry: a case study in Eastern
China. J Cle Prod, 1–8
19. Gajdzik B, Gawlik R, Skoczypiec S (2018) Forecasting-scenario-heuristic method proposal
for assessment of feasibility of steel production scenarios in Poland—Managerial implications
for production engineering. Arch Civ Mech Eng 18:1651–1660
20. Gerbens-Leenes PW, Hoekstra AY, Bosman R (2018) The blue and grey water footprint of
construction materials: steel, cement and glass. Water Resour Ind 19:1–12