Table 3.4 Different types of ionic liquids and summary of their performance for wheat straw
pretreatment are listed below
Ionic
liquids
Experimental
conditions
Target wheat
straw
composition
Composition
treated yield
Ethanol
production
Reference
Amim-Cl (1) ____
Zhi-guo and
Hongzhang
(2012)
(2) ____
Glucose
46.7%
(3) 150
C
Hemicellulose
10.8%
55.2%
(4) 6 h
24.2%
(5) 0.5 g
Lignin
EmimCH 3 COO
(1) 150 mg
Fu and
Mazza
(2011), Zhu
et al. (2017)
(2) 0.5 mm
Glucose
19.7(%w/w
(3)150
C
Cellulose
biomass)
(4) 24 h
Lignin
29.5 mg
________
(5) 2 g
52.7%
BmimSCN
(1)
Da Costa
Lopes et al.
(2013)
(2)
Cellulose
83.4% (w/w)
(3)120
C
Hemicellulose
11.7% (w/w)
_________
(4) 6 h
Lignin
25.3 mg
(5) 5% w/w
BmimHSO 4
(1) 0.5 mm
André et al.
(2013)
(2)_____
Glucose
93.1 Æ 4.1 Mol
%
(3) 120
C
Reducing sugars
62.3 Mol%
(4) 6 h
Lignin
62%wt.
(5)5% (w/w
biomass )
EMIMDEP
(1) ____
Li et al.
(2009)
(2) 0.5 cm
Glucose
2.51 mg/
10 mg RWS
(3) 130
C
Reducing sugars 54.8% RWS
0.43 g/g of
glucose in
26 h
(4) 12 h
(5) 120 g
Lignin
____
Ch-Tau
(1) 2% wt.
(2) 250–420 μm Glucose
____
(3) 90
C
Reducing sugars 74.2%
____
Ren et al.
(2016)
(4) 48 h
Lignin
68.8%
(5)150 g
(1) ILs concentration, (2) particle size, (3) effect of temperature, (4) effect of contact times,
(5) wheat straw dosage
Note: RWS regenerated wheat straw
60
I. Neme and C. Masi