4 Conclusions and Perspectives
Waste minimization plays a major role in reducing the pollution load and the cost.
The chapter reviewed sustainable concerns to treat textile effluent through some
common methods, including flocculation, coagulation, adsorption, ozonation, and
biological method. Compared with physiochemical methods, biological methods can
be an appropriate method in terms of cost efficiency and be a better alternative for
textile wastewater treatment. All the other techniques are expensive and have
significant drawbacks when applied to the textile effluent treatment.
References
Adams CD, Fusco W, Kanzelmeyer T (1995) Ozone, hydrogen peroxide/ozone and UV/ozone
treatment of chromium and copper complex dyes: decolorization and metal release. Ozone Sci
Eng 17:149–161
Ahmad R, Mondal PK (2009) Application of acid treated almond peel for removal and recovery of
brilliant green from industrial wastewater by column operation. Sep Sci Technol 44
(7):1638–1655
Ajaz M, Shakeel S, Rehman A (2020) Microbial use for azo dye degradation – a strategy for dye
bioremediation. Int Microbiol 23:149–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10123-019-00103-2
Alkaya E, Bögürcü M, Ulutaş F, Demirer GN (2012) Cleaner (sustainable) production in textile wet
processing. In: Non-conventional textile waste water treatment, Nova Science Publishers, Inc,
pp 205–229
Almyasheva NR, Shuktueva MI, Petrova DA, Kopitsyn DS, Kotelev MS, Vinokurov VA, Novikov
AA (2018) Biodiesel fuel production by Aspergillus niger whole-cell biocatalyst in optimized
medium. Mycoscience 59(2):147e152
Araújo R, Casal M, Cavaco-Paulo A (2008) Application of enzymes for textile fibres processing.
Biocatal Biotransform. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242420802390457
Asha S, Viraraghavan T (2010) Decolorization of dye wastewaters by biosorbents: a review. J
Environ Manag 91:1915–1929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.05.003
Bhosale S, Saratale G, Govindwar S (2006) Biotransformation enzymes. J Bas Microbiol
46:444–448
Bisschops I, Henri S (2003) Literature review on textile wastewater characterisation. Environ
Technol 24:1399–1411. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330309385684
Bizuneh A (2012) Textile effluent treatment & decolorization techniques. Chem Bulgarian J Sci
Edu 21:434–456
Brahmbhatt NH, Jasrai RT (2016) The role of algae in bioremediation of textile effluent. Int J Eng
Res Gen Sci 4(1):443–453
Broadbent AD (2001) Basic principles of textile coloration. Society of Dyers and Colourists,
England
Brüschweiler BJ, Merlot C (2017) Azo dyes in clothing textiles can be cleaved into a series of
mutagenic aromatic amines which are not regulated yet. Regulat Toxicol Pharmacol. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.06.012
Carmen Z, Daniela S (2012) Textile organic dyes – characteristics, polluting effects and separation/
elimination procedures from industrial effluents – a critical overview. In: Puzyn T, MostragSzlichtyng A (eds) Organic pollutants ten years after the Stockholm convention – environmental
and analytical update. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/32373
214
K. Rajan et al.
Waste minimization plays a major role in reducing the pollution load and the cost.
The chapter reviewed sustainable concerns to treat textile effluent through some
common methods, including flocculation, coagulation, adsorption, ozonation, and
biological method. Compared with physiochemical methods, biological methods can
be an appropriate method in terms of cost efficiency and be a better alternative for
textile wastewater treatment. All the other techniques are expensive and have
significant drawbacks when applied to the textile effluent treatment.
References
Adams CD, Fusco W, Kanzelmeyer T (1995) Ozone, hydrogen peroxide/ozone and UV/ozone
treatment of chromium and copper complex dyes: decolorization and metal release. Ozone Sci
Eng 17:149–161
Ahmad R, Mondal PK (2009) Application of acid treated almond peel for removal and recovery of
brilliant green from industrial wastewater by column operation. Sep Sci Technol 44
(7):1638–1655
Ajaz M, Shakeel S, Rehman A (2020) Microbial use for azo dye degradation – a strategy for dye
bioremediation. Int Microbiol 23:149–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10123-019-00103-2
Alkaya E, Bögürcü M, Ulutaş F, Demirer GN (2012) Cleaner (sustainable) production in textile wet
processing. In: Non-conventional textile waste water treatment, Nova Science Publishers, Inc,
pp 205–229
Almyasheva NR, Shuktueva MI, Petrova DA, Kopitsyn DS, Kotelev MS, Vinokurov VA, Novikov
AA (2018) Biodiesel fuel production by Aspergillus niger whole-cell biocatalyst in optimized
medium. Mycoscience 59(2):147e152
Araújo R, Casal M, Cavaco-Paulo A (2008) Application of enzymes for textile fibres processing.
Biocatal Biotransform. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242420802390457
Asha S, Viraraghavan T (2010) Decolorization of dye wastewaters by biosorbents: a review. J
Environ Manag 91:1915–1929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.05.003
Bhosale S, Saratale G, Govindwar S (2006) Biotransformation enzymes. J Bas Microbiol
46:444–448
Bisschops I, Henri S (2003) Literature review on textile wastewater characterisation. Environ
Technol 24:1399–1411. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330309385684
Bizuneh A (2012) Textile effluent treatment & decolorization techniques. Chem Bulgarian J Sci
Edu 21:434–456
Brahmbhatt NH, Jasrai RT (2016) The role of algae in bioremediation of textile effluent. Int J Eng
Res Gen Sci 4(1):443–453
Broadbent AD (2001) Basic principles of textile coloration. Society of Dyers and Colourists,
England
Brüschweiler BJ, Merlot C (2017) Azo dyes in clothing textiles can be cleaved into a series of
mutagenic aromatic amines which are not regulated yet. Regulat Toxicol Pharmacol. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.06.012
Carmen Z, Daniela S (2012) Textile organic dyes – characteristics, polluting effects and separation/
elimination procedures from industrial effluents – a critical overview. In: Puzyn T, MostragSzlichtyng A (eds) Organic pollutants ten years after the Stockholm convention – environmental
and analytical update. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/32373
214
K. Rajan et al.