consumption. Co-benefit effects vary depending on energy consumption structures,
switching among fossil fuels or to non-fossil fuels, and energy utilization technologies. Increased carbon taxes lead to the introduction of new energy technologies,
which may have different effects on carbon, SO 2 , and NO x abatements in different
countries. Existing emissions with high removal rates will be less affected by carbon
taxes. In this case, SO 2 and NO x emissions can feasibly be further reduced by relying
on CO 2 abatement technology.
References
Manne AS, Richels RG (1992) Buying greenhouse insurance. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Burniaux J-M, Martin J, Nicoletti G, Martins JO (1991) GREEN a multi-sector, multi-region
general equilibrium model for quantifying the costs of curbing CO2 emissions: a technical
manual. France
Chang HJ, Cho GL, Kim YD (2006) The economic impact of strengthening fuel quality regulationreducing sulfur content in diesel fuel. Energ Pol 34:2572–2585
den Elzen MGJ, Hof AF, Beltran AM, Grassi G, Roelfsema M, van Ruijven B et al (2011) The
Copenhagen Accord: abatement costs and carbon prices resulting from the submissions. Environ Sci Pol 14(1):28–29
Fricko O, Havlik P, Rogelj J, Klimont Z, Gusti M, Johnson N et al (2016) The marker quantification
of the shared socioeconomic pathway 2: a middle-of-the-road scenario for the 21st century.
Glob Environ Chang 42:251–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.004
Graus WHJ, Worrell E (2007) Effects of SO_2 and NO_x control on energy-efficiency power
generation. Energ Pol 35:3898–3908
IEA (ed) (2010) World Energy Outlook 2010. International Energy Agency Press, Paris
IEA (ed) (2011a) Energy statistics of non-OECD countries, 2011 edition. International Energy
Agency Press, Paris
IEA (ed) (2011b) Energy statistics of OECD countries, 2011 edition. International Energy Agency
Press, Paris
Kahouli-Brahmi S (2008) Technological learning in energy–environment–economy modelling: a
survey. Energ Pol 36(1):138–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.09.001
Lu Z, Streets DG, Zhang Q, Wang S, Carmichael GR, Cheng YF, Wei C, Chin M, Diehl T, Tan Q
(2010) Sulfur dioxide emissions in China and sulfur trends in East Asia since 2000. Atmos
Chem Phys 10:6311–6331
Nurrohim A, Sakugawa H (2004) A fuel-based inventory of NO_x and SO_2 emissions from
manufacturing industries in Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan. Appl Energ 78:355–369
O’Neill BC, Kriegler E, Ebi KL, Kemp-Benedict E, Riahi K, Rothman DS et al (2014) The roads
ahead: Narratives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st
century. Glob Environ Chang. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.004
Prywes M (1986) A nested CES approach to capital-energy substitution. Energ Econom (1):22–28
Su X, Ren H, Zhou W, Mu H, Nakagami K (2010) Study on future scenarios of low-carbon Society
in East Asia Area, part 1: development of glocal century energy and environment planning
model and case study. Pol Sci 17(2):85–96
Su X, Zhou W, Ren H, Nakagami K (2012a) Co-benefit analysis of carbon emission reduction
measures for China, Japan and Korea. Pol Sci 19(2)
Su X, Zhou W, Nakagami K, Ren H, Mu H (2012b) Capital stock-labor-energy substitution and
production efficiency study for China. Energ Econom 34(4):1208–1213. https://doi.org/10.
1016/j.eneco.2011.11.002
100
X. Su and W. Zhou
switching among fossil fuels or to non-fossil fuels, and energy utilization technologies. Increased carbon taxes lead to the introduction of new energy technologies,
which may have different effects on carbon, SO 2 , and NO x abatements in different
countries. Existing emissions with high removal rates will be less affected by carbon
taxes. In this case, SO 2 and NO x emissions can feasibly be further reduced by relying
on CO 2 abatement technology.
References
Manne AS, Richels RG (1992) Buying greenhouse insurance. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Burniaux J-M, Martin J, Nicoletti G, Martins JO (1991) GREEN a multi-sector, multi-region
general equilibrium model for quantifying the costs of curbing CO2 emissions: a technical
manual. France
Chang HJ, Cho GL, Kim YD (2006) The economic impact of strengthening fuel quality regulationreducing sulfur content in diesel fuel. Energ Pol 34:2572–2585
den Elzen MGJ, Hof AF, Beltran AM, Grassi G, Roelfsema M, van Ruijven B et al (2011) The
Copenhagen Accord: abatement costs and carbon prices resulting from the submissions. Environ Sci Pol 14(1):28–29
Fricko O, Havlik P, Rogelj J, Klimont Z, Gusti M, Johnson N et al (2016) The marker quantification
of the shared socioeconomic pathway 2: a middle-of-the-road scenario for the 21st century.
Glob Environ Chang 42:251–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.004
Graus WHJ, Worrell E (2007) Effects of SO_2 and NO_x control on energy-efficiency power
generation. Energ Pol 35:3898–3908
IEA (ed) (2010) World Energy Outlook 2010. International Energy Agency Press, Paris
IEA (ed) (2011a) Energy statistics of non-OECD countries, 2011 edition. International Energy
Agency Press, Paris
IEA (ed) (2011b) Energy statistics of OECD countries, 2011 edition. International Energy Agency
Press, Paris
Kahouli-Brahmi S (2008) Technological learning in energy–environment–economy modelling: a
survey. Energ Pol 36(1):138–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.09.001
Lu Z, Streets DG, Zhang Q, Wang S, Carmichael GR, Cheng YF, Wei C, Chin M, Diehl T, Tan Q
(2010) Sulfur dioxide emissions in China and sulfur trends in East Asia since 2000. Atmos
Chem Phys 10:6311–6331
Nurrohim A, Sakugawa H (2004) A fuel-based inventory of NO_x and SO_2 emissions from
manufacturing industries in Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan. Appl Energ 78:355–369
O’Neill BC, Kriegler E, Ebi KL, Kemp-Benedict E, Riahi K, Rothman DS et al (2014) The roads
ahead: Narratives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st
century. Glob Environ Chang. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.004
Prywes M (1986) A nested CES approach to capital-energy substitution. Energ Econom (1):22–28
Su X, Ren H, Zhou W, Mu H, Nakagami K (2010) Study on future scenarios of low-carbon Society
in East Asia Area, part 1: development of glocal century energy and environment planning
model and case study. Pol Sci 17(2):85–96
Su X, Zhou W, Ren H, Nakagami K (2012a) Co-benefit analysis of carbon emission reduction
measures for China, Japan and Korea. Pol Sci 19(2)
Su X, Zhou W, Nakagami K, Ren H, Mu H (2012b) Capital stock-labor-energy substitution and
production efficiency study for China. Energ Econom 34(4):1208–1213. https://doi.org/10.
1016/j.eneco.2011.11.002
100
X. Su and W. Zhou