59. Ekvall T, Weidema BP (2004) System boundaries
and input data in consequential life cycle inventory analysis. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9:161–171.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02994190
60. Schmidt JH (2008) System delimitation in
agricultural consequential LCA: outline of
methodology and illustrative case study of
wheat in Denmark. Int J Life Cycle Assess
13:350–364.
https://doi.org/10.1007/
s11367-008-0016-x
61. Va ´zquez-Rowe I, Rege S, Marvuglia A,
The ´nie J, Haurie A, Benetto E (2013) Application of three independent consequential LCA
approaches to the agricultural sector in Luxembourg. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18:1593–1604.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0604-2
62. Dale BE, Kim S (2014) Can the predictions of
consequential life cycle assessment be tested in
the real world? Comment on “Using Attributional Life Cycle Assessment to Estimate
Climate-Change Mitigation...”. J Ind Ecol
18:466–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.
12151
63. Herrmann C, FitzGerald J, O’Shea R, Xia A,
O’Kiely P, Murphy JD (2015) Ensiling of seaweed for a seaweed biofuel industry. Bioresour
Technol 196:301–313. https://doi.org/10.
1016/j.biortech.2015.07.098
64. Bruhn A, Tørring D, Thomsen M, CanalVerge ´s P, Nielsen M, Rasmussen M, Eybye K,
Larsen M, Balsby T, Petersen J (2016) Impact
of environmental conditions on biomass yield,
quality, and bio-mitigation capacity of Saccharina latissima. Aquac Environ Interact
8:619–636.
https://doi.org/10.3354/
aei00200
Life Cycle Assessment
119