zeolite, aquaporin, nanocomposite nanotube and
graphene-based membranes.
• Advanced membrane surface modification and also
development of self-assembled materials.
• Fully evaluation on performance of the membrane in
long-term operation.
• Clarification on the interactions with different membrane
materials.
• New analytical techniques for a better characterization of
organics in PW treatment plant.
• Organic removal efficiency by membrane technology
should be analysed qualitatively and quantitatively in
feed and permeate.
• Reducing the energy consumption by utilizing the salinity, organics or waste heat in the feed and to generate
power.
• The use of organics and nutrients from MFC and MDC to
produce electricity.
• Introducing blue energy, which is a renewable, clean and
sustainable by salinity gradients from two membrane
technologies (PRO and RED).
• Alternative materials to fabricate the membranes with
good and sustainable chemicals properties as well as low
cost and economic.
References
Abadi, S. R. H., Sebzari, M. R., Hemati, M., Rekabdar, F., &
Mohammadi, T. (2011). Ceramic membrane performance in
microfiltration of oily wastewater. Desalination, 265, 222–228.
Abbasi, M., Mirfendereski, M., Nikbakht, M., Golshenas, M., &
Mohammadi, T. (2010). Performance study of mullite and mullite–
alumina ceramic MF membranes for oily wastewaters treatment.
Desalination, 259, 169–178.
Akyon, B., Stachler, E., Wei, N., & Bibby, K. (2015). Microbial mats
as a biological treatment approach for saline wastewaters: The case
of produced water from hydraulic fracturing. Environmental
Science & Technology, 49, 6172–6180.
Alpatova, A., Kim, E.-S., Dong, S., Sun, N., Chelme-Ayala, P., &
Gamal El-Din, M. (2014). Treatment of oil sands process-affected
water with ceramic ultrafiltration membrane: Effects of operating
conditions on membrane performance. Separation and Purification
Technology, 122, 170–182.
Alzahrani, S., & Mohammad, A. W. (2014). Challenges and trends in
membrane technology implementation for produced water treatment: A review. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 4(C), 107–
133.
Baker, R. W. (2004). Membrane technology and applications (2nd ed.).
West Sussex, England: Wiley.
Bella, E. A., Poynora, T. E., Newharta, K. B., Regnerya, J., Codaya, B.
D., & Cath, T. Y. (2017). Produced water treatment using forward
osmosis membranes: Evaluation of extended-time performance and
fouling. Journal of Membrane Science, 525, 77–88.
Bernardo, P., & Drioli, E. (2010). Membrane technology: Latest
applications in the refinery and petrochemical field. In D. Enrico &
G. Lidietta (Eds.), Comprehensive membrane science and engineering (pp. 211–239). Oxford: Elsevier.
Caballero, J. A., Grossmann, I. E., Keyvani, M., & Lenz, E. S. (2009).
Design of hybrid distillation-vapor membrane separation systems.
Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 48(20), 9151–
9162.
Chang, H., Li, T., Liu, B., Vidic, R. D., Elimelech, M., & Crittenden,
J. C. (2019). Potential and implemented membrane-based technologies for the treatment and reuse of flowback and produced water
from shale gas and oil plays: A review. Desalination, 455, 34–57.
Chen, G., Wang, Z., Nghiem, L. D., Li, X.-M., Xie, M., Zhao, B., et al.
(2015). Treatment of shale gas drilling flowback fluids (SGDFs) by
forward osmosis: Membrane fouling and mitigation. Desalination,
366, 113–120.
Cho, H., Choi, Y., & Lee, S. (2018). Effect of pretreatment and operating
conditions on the performance of membrane distillation for the
treatment of shale gas wastewater. Desalination, 437, 195–209.
Coday, B. D., Almaraz, N., & Cath, T. Y. (2015). Forward osmosis
desalination of oil and gas wastewater: Impacts of membrane
selection and operating conditions on process performance. Journal
of Membrane Science, 488, 40–55.
Cui, J., Zhang, X., Liu, H., Liu, S., & Yeung, K. L. (2008). Preparation
and application of zeolite/ceramic microfiltration membranes for
treatment of oil contaminated water. Journal of Membrane Science,
325, 420–426.
Drioli, E., Profio, G. D., & Curcio, E. (2012). Progress in membrane
crystallization. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, 1, 178–
182.
Drioli, E., Stankiewiczd, A. I., & Macedonio, F. (2011). Membrane
engineering in process intensification—An overview. Journal of
Membrane Science, 380, 1–8.
Duong, P. H., & Chung, T. S. (2014). Application of thin film
composite membranes with forward osmosis technology for the
separation of emulsified oil–water. Journal of Membrane Science,
452, 117–126.
Ebrahimi, M., Ashaghi, K. S., Engel, L., Willershausen, D., Mund, P.,
Bolduan, P., & Czermak, P. (2009). Characterization and application of different ceramic membranes for the oil-field produced water
treatment. Desalination, 245, 533–540.
Ebrahimi, M., Willershausen, D., Ashaghi, K. S., Engel, L., Placido, L.,
Mund, P., Bolduan, P., & Czermak, P. (2010). Investigations on the
use of different ceramic membranes for efficient oil-field produced
water treatment. Desalination, 250(3), 991–996.
Fakhru’l-Razi, A., Pendashteh, A., Abdullah, L. C., Biak, D. R.,
Madaeni, S. S., & Abidin, Z. Z. (2009). Review of technologies for
oil and gas produced water treatment. Journal of Hazardous
Materials, 170, 530–551.
Forrestal, C., Stoll, Z., Xu, P., & Ren, Z. J. (2015). Microbial capacitive
desalination for integrated organic matter and salt removal and
energy production from unconventional natural gas produced water.
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology, 1, 47–55.
Frank, V. B., Regnery, J, Chan, K. E., Ramey, D. F., Spear, J. R., &
Cath, T. Y. (2017). Co-treatment of residential and oil and gas
production wastewater with a hybrid sequencing batch
reactor-membrane bioreactor process. Journal of Water Process
Engineering, 17, 82–94.
Freedman, D. E., Riley, S. M., Jones, Z. L., Rosenblum, J. S., Sharp,
J. O., Spear, J. R., & Cath, T. Y. (2017). Biologically active
filtration for fracturing flowback and produced water treatment.
Journal of Water Process Engineering, 18, 29–40.
González, B., & Ortiz, I. (2002). Modelling and simulation of a hybrid
process (pervaporation-distillation) for the separation of azeotropic
mixtures of alcohol-ether. Journal of Chemical Technology and
Biotechnology, 77(1), 29–42.
88
M. A. B. Pauzan et al.
graphene-based membranes.
• Advanced membrane surface modification and also
development of self-assembled materials.
• Fully evaluation on performance of the membrane in
long-term operation.
• Clarification on the interactions with different membrane
materials.
• New analytical techniques for a better characterization of
organics in PW treatment plant.
• Organic removal efficiency by membrane technology
should be analysed qualitatively and quantitatively in
feed and permeate.
• Reducing the energy consumption by utilizing the salinity, organics or waste heat in the feed and to generate
power.
• The use of organics and nutrients from MFC and MDC to
produce electricity.
• Introducing blue energy, which is a renewable, clean and
sustainable by salinity gradients from two membrane
technologies (PRO and RED).
• Alternative materials to fabricate the membranes with
good and sustainable chemicals properties as well as low
cost and economic.
References
Abadi, S. R. H., Sebzari, M. R., Hemati, M., Rekabdar, F., &
Mohammadi, T. (2011). Ceramic membrane performance in
microfiltration of oily wastewater. Desalination, 265, 222–228.
Abbasi, M., Mirfendereski, M., Nikbakht, M., Golshenas, M., &
Mohammadi, T. (2010). Performance study of mullite and mullite–
alumina ceramic MF membranes for oily wastewaters treatment.
Desalination, 259, 169–178.
Akyon, B., Stachler, E., Wei, N., & Bibby, K. (2015). Microbial mats
as a biological treatment approach for saline wastewaters: The case
of produced water from hydraulic fracturing. Environmental
Science & Technology, 49, 6172–6180.
Alpatova, A., Kim, E.-S., Dong, S., Sun, N., Chelme-Ayala, P., &
Gamal El-Din, M. (2014). Treatment of oil sands process-affected
water with ceramic ultrafiltration membrane: Effects of operating
conditions on membrane performance. Separation and Purification
Technology, 122, 170–182.
Alzahrani, S., & Mohammad, A. W. (2014). Challenges and trends in
membrane technology implementation for produced water treatment: A review. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 4(C), 107–
133.
Baker, R. W. (2004). Membrane technology and applications (2nd ed.).
West Sussex, England: Wiley.
Bella, E. A., Poynora, T. E., Newharta, K. B., Regnerya, J., Codaya, B.
D., & Cath, T. Y. (2017). Produced water treatment using forward
osmosis membranes: Evaluation of extended-time performance and
fouling. Journal of Membrane Science, 525, 77–88.
Bernardo, P., & Drioli, E. (2010). Membrane technology: Latest
applications in the refinery and petrochemical field. In D. Enrico &
G. Lidietta (Eds.), Comprehensive membrane science and engineering (pp. 211–239). Oxford: Elsevier.
Caballero, J. A., Grossmann, I. E., Keyvani, M., & Lenz, E. S. (2009).
Design of hybrid distillation-vapor membrane separation systems.
Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 48(20), 9151–
9162.
Chang, H., Li, T., Liu, B., Vidic, R. D., Elimelech, M., & Crittenden,
J. C. (2019). Potential and implemented membrane-based technologies for the treatment and reuse of flowback and produced water
from shale gas and oil plays: A review. Desalination, 455, 34–57.
Chen, G., Wang, Z., Nghiem, L. D., Li, X.-M., Xie, M., Zhao, B., et al.
(2015). Treatment of shale gas drilling flowback fluids (SGDFs) by
forward osmosis: Membrane fouling and mitigation. Desalination,
366, 113–120.
Cho, H., Choi, Y., & Lee, S. (2018). Effect of pretreatment and operating
conditions on the performance of membrane distillation for the
treatment of shale gas wastewater. Desalination, 437, 195–209.
Coday, B. D., Almaraz, N., & Cath, T. Y. (2015). Forward osmosis
desalination of oil and gas wastewater: Impacts of membrane
selection and operating conditions on process performance. Journal
of Membrane Science, 488, 40–55.
Cui, J., Zhang, X., Liu, H., Liu, S., & Yeung, K. L. (2008). Preparation
and application of zeolite/ceramic microfiltration membranes for
treatment of oil contaminated water. Journal of Membrane Science,
325, 420–426.
Drioli, E., Profio, G. D., & Curcio, E. (2012). Progress in membrane
crystallization. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering, 1, 178–
182.
Drioli, E., Stankiewiczd, A. I., & Macedonio, F. (2011). Membrane
engineering in process intensification—An overview. Journal of
Membrane Science, 380, 1–8.
Duong, P. H., & Chung, T. S. (2014). Application of thin film
composite membranes with forward osmosis technology for the
separation of emulsified oil–water. Journal of Membrane Science,
452, 117–126.
Ebrahimi, M., Ashaghi, K. S., Engel, L., Willershausen, D., Mund, P.,
Bolduan, P., & Czermak, P. (2009). Characterization and application of different ceramic membranes for the oil-field produced water
treatment. Desalination, 245, 533–540.
Ebrahimi, M., Willershausen, D., Ashaghi, K. S., Engel, L., Placido, L.,
Mund, P., Bolduan, P., & Czermak, P. (2010). Investigations on the
use of different ceramic membranes for efficient oil-field produced
water treatment. Desalination, 250(3), 991–996.
Fakhru’l-Razi, A., Pendashteh, A., Abdullah, L. C., Biak, D. R.,
Madaeni, S. S., & Abidin, Z. Z. (2009). Review of technologies for
oil and gas produced water treatment. Journal of Hazardous
Materials, 170, 530–551.
Forrestal, C., Stoll, Z., Xu, P., & Ren, Z. J. (2015). Microbial capacitive
desalination for integrated organic matter and salt removal and
energy production from unconventional natural gas produced water.
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology, 1, 47–55.
Frank, V. B., Regnery, J, Chan, K. E., Ramey, D. F., Spear, J. R., &
Cath, T. Y. (2017). Co-treatment of residential and oil and gas
production wastewater with a hybrid sequencing batch
reactor-membrane bioreactor process. Journal of Water Process
Engineering, 17, 82–94.
Freedman, D. E., Riley, S. M., Jones, Z. L., Rosenblum, J. S., Sharp,
J. O., Spear, J. R., & Cath, T. Y. (2017). Biologically active
filtration for fracturing flowback and produced water treatment.
Journal of Water Process Engineering, 18, 29–40.
González, B., & Ortiz, I. (2002). Modelling and simulation of a hybrid
process (pervaporation-distillation) for the separation of azeotropic
mixtures of alcohol-ether. Journal of Chemical Technology and
Biotechnology, 77(1), 29–42.
88
M. A. B. Pauzan et al.