Macroergonomics as a Way for Social Responsibility…
625
This article was limited to steps1 to 4 of the MA method. According to the premise
of participatory ergonomics, a solution’s proposal must take into consideration all
those involved, ensuring the best solution from the point of view of both employees
and organization. It is suggested to propose improvements together with employees,
management and ergonomics team. Engineering and other ergonomics tools can help
find optimal solutions by identifying the root cause of the highlighted problems. MA
acts in the social aspect of sustainable development, contemplating social responsibility, and, considering the economic aspect, applications of macroergonomics can
improve systems performance.
Finally, this study continuity is important in order to analyze possible changes;
simulate environmental changes at the organization and validate proposals based
on the analysis of the simulated changes of activities in a real work situation, what
corresponds to the fifth step of MA. Then, move to the sixth step, writing up the
ergonomic analysis report, the proposal of solutions to promote the optimization of
systems performance, with the collaboration of the ambulatory team. In order to meet
the tripod of sustainable development, the ecological aspect should be considered in
these solutions.
Acknowledgements This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento
de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)—finance code 001 and partly supported by the
Institutional Scholarship Program of Scientific Initiation of PUCPR.
References
Bolis I, Brunoro CM, Sznelwar LI (2014) Work in corporate sustainability policies: the contribution
of ergonomics. Work 49:417–431 417. 10.3233/WOR-141962
CMMAD (Comissão Mundial sobre Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento) (1991) Nosso futuro
comum. 2ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: FGV
Derenevich MG, Bitencourt RS, Victorino AJ, Canciglieri O, Monteiro LV (2017) Estado da arte
da macroergonomia: um estudo em busca da melhoria de performance do sistema educacional.
XXXVIII International Sodebras Congress, vol 13, n 147
Evangelista R (2010) Sustentabilidade Um possível caminho para o sucesso empresarial?. Rev.
Portuguesa e Brasileira de Gestão [online]. Vol 9, n 1–2 pp 85–96. https://www.scielo.mec.pt/
scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1645-44642010000100009&lng=pt&nrm=iso ISSN 1645–
4464. Accessed 13 Feb 2020
Guimarães LB, de M (2002) Análise Macroergonômica do Trabalho—AMT. Modelo de implementação e avaliação de um programa de ergonomia da empresa (Unfinished Article). https://www.
ergonomia.ufpr.br/indicadorAMT.pdf. Accessed 13 Feb 2020
Guimarães LBM (2004) Introdução à quarta-fase da ergonomia: Macroergonomia. In: Guimarães,
Lia BM, Ergonomia do Processo. 4º Edição. Porto Alegre: FEENG; UFRGS
Hendrick HW, Kleiner BM (eds) (2002) Human factors and ergonomics. Macroergonomics: theory,
methods, and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. https://doi.org/https://doi.
org/10.1201/b12477
Hendrick HW, Kleiner BM (2001) Macroergonomics: an introduction to work system design.
Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica
Précédent

- 616/678

Suivant