528
N. Brambilla et al.
stimulating increased production so that the social changes leading to greater capacity
and resources to organizations (Degen 2009).
It is true that there is a close relationship between innovation and entrepreneurship.
Innovation is the characteristic tool of entrepreneurs, that is, the means by which they
exploit change as an opportunity for a new business or service. Thus, entrepreneurs
need to search for the sources of innovation, change and its evidence pointing the
opportunity (Drucker 2010).
Entrepreneurship can be divided into two components: i. The first relates to the
generation of new businesses or setting up a business; ii. The second aspect relates
to the expansion of a business or existing business. In both stands out corporate
behavior aimed at seeking and exploring new opportunities, creating economic and
social value for the community or customers (Dolabella 2003).
Social entrepreneurship has emerged in recent decades as a way to identify and
generate possibly transformative changes in society. A combination of government
intervention and pure entrepreneurial business:
The social enterprise is able to treat problems whose scope is too narrow to instigate the
legislative or to attract private capital activism. The success of these projects depends on
both an adoption social goals as strict financial constraints. Typically, the goal is to benefit a
specific group of people, transforming their lives permanently changing a prevailing socioeconomic balance that operates to the detriment of their interests (Martin and Osberg 2015,
p. 2).
The study Greg Dees, on the concept of social entrepreneurship, was written
only in 1998 and revised by the author in 2001 and despite the result to describe
the differences between the classic entrepreneur and social entrepreneur, did not
capture the look of cultural movement that was emerging transformer (EB 2001).
“The language of the transformative movement is new, although their practice is not,
“there have always been social entrepreneurs, even if they were not so designated”
(Dees 2001, p. 2).
3 Procedimentos Methodological
The adopted methodological procedure is divided into three groups of activities:
consulting the literature, development and empirical evidence. The query to the literature involved the collection and selection of literature related to the theme “Social
Entrepreneurship Generator Social Innovation”. Already occurred in developing the
analysis of the content, with the aim of “nalisar factors that must be present in the
social enterprise for this to be considered social innovation generator”.
The literature review provides an introductory perspective on the development of
a research project and resumes the accumulated scientific knowledge on the subject.
It also enables the researcher to become even more familiar with the subject searched,
allowing you to create new constructs (Afonso et al. 2012). Similarly, The literature
relating to the study further and continuous dialogue with the literature, filling gaps
and extending earlier studies (Creswell 2010).
N. Brambilla et al.
stimulating increased production so that the social changes leading to greater capacity
and resources to organizations (Degen 2009).
It is true that there is a close relationship between innovation and entrepreneurship.
Innovation is the characteristic tool of entrepreneurs, that is, the means by which they
exploit change as an opportunity for a new business or service. Thus, entrepreneurs
need to search for the sources of innovation, change and its evidence pointing the
opportunity (Drucker 2010).
Entrepreneurship can be divided into two components: i. The first relates to the
generation of new businesses or setting up a business; ii. The second aspect relates
to the expansion of a business or existing business. In both stands out corporate
behavior aimed at seeking and exploring new opportunities, creating economic and
social value for the community or customers (Dolabella 2003).
Social entrepreneurship has emerged in recent decades as a way to identify and
generate possibly transformative changes in society. A combination of government
intervention and pure entrepreneurial business:
The social enterprise is able to treat problems whose scope is too narrow to instigate the
legislative or to attract private capital activism. The success of these projects depends on
both an adoption social goals as strict financial constraints. Typically, the goal is to benefit a
specific group of people, transforming their lives permanently changing a prevailing socioeconomic balance that operates to the detriment of their interests (Martin and Osberg 2015,
p. 2).
The study Greg Dees, on the concept of social entrepreneurship, was written
only in 1998 and revised by the author in 2001 and despite the result to describe
the differences between the classic entrepreneur and social entrepreneur, did not
capture the look of cultural movement that was emerging transformer (EB 2001).
“The language of the transformative movement is new, although their practice is not,
“there have always been social entrepreneurs, even if they were not so designated”
(Dees 2001, p. 2).
3 Procedimentos Methodological
The adopted methodological procedure is divided into three groups of activities:
consulting the literature, development and empirical evidence. The query to the literature involved the collection and selection of literature related to the theme “Social
Entrepreneurship Generator Social Innovation”. Already occurred in developing the
analysis of the content, with the aim of “nalisar factors that must be present in the
social enterprise for this to be considered social innovation generator”.
The literature review provides an introductory perspective on the development of
a research project and resumes the accumulated scientific knowledge on the subject.
It also enables the researcher to become even more familiar with the subject searched,
allowing you to create new constructs (Afonso et al. 2012). Similarly, The literature
relating to the study further and continuous dialogue with the literature, filling gaps
and extending earlier studies (Creswell 2010).