References
113
GFN (Global Footprint Network) (2012) National footprint accounts 2012 Edition. http://www.foo
tprintnetwork.org/images/article_uploads/National_Footprint_Accounts_2012_Edition_Report.
pdf
Giampietro M, Saltelli A (2014) Footprints to nowhere. Ecol Ind 46:610–621
Goodland R, Daly H (1996) Environmental sustainability: Universal and non-negotiable. Ecol Appl
6:1002–1017
Griggs D, Stafford-Smith M, Gaffney O, Rockström J, Öhman MC, Shyamsundar P, Steffen W,
Glaser G, Kanie N, Noble I (2013) Sustainable development goal for people and planet. Nature
495:305–307
Hoekstra AY (2009) Human appropriation of natural capital: a comparison of ecological footprint
and water footprint analysis. Ecol Econ 68:1963–1974
Hoekstra AY (2015) The sustainability of a single activity, production process or product. Ecol Ind
57:82–84
Hoekstra AY, Hung PQ (2002) Virtual water trade: a quantification of virtual water flows between
nations in relation to international crop trade. Value of water research report series (No. 11),
UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education, Delft, The Netherlands
Hoekstra AY, Wiedmann TO (2014) Humanity’s unsustainable environmental footprint. Science
344:1114–1117
Hoekstra AY, Mekonnen MM, Chapagain AK, Mathews RE, Richter BD (2012) Global monthly
water scarcity: blue water footprints versus blue water availability. PLoS ONE 7:e32688
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2014). Climate change 2014 synthesis report
http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/syr/SYR_AR5_LONGERREPORT.pdf
Jaramillo F, Destouni G (2015) Comment on “Planetary boundaries: guiding human development
on a changing planet”. Science 348, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa9629
Jones N (2007) China tops CO 2 emissions. Nature 448, https://doi.org/10.1038/news070618-9
Kaly U, Briguglio L, McLeod H, Schmall S, Pratt C, Pal R (1999) Environmental vulnerability index
(EVI) to summarise national environmental vulnerability profiles. SOPAC Technical Report 275.
http://ict.sopac.org/VirLib/TR0275.pdf
Kates RW (2011) What kind of a science is sustainability science? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
108:19449–19450
Kitzes J, Galli A, Bagliani M, Barrett J, Dige G, Ede S, Erb K, Giljum S, Haberl H, Hails C, JoliaFerrier L, Jungwirth S, Lenzen M, Lewis K, Loh J, Marchettini N, Messinger H, Milne K, Moles
R, Monfreda C, Moran D, Nakano K, Pyhälä A, Rees W, Simmons C, Wackernagel M, Wada
Y, Walsh C, Wiedmann T (2009) A research agenda for improving national ecological footprint
accounts. Ecol Econ 68:1991–2007
Lewis SL (2012) We must set planetary boundaries wisely. Nature 485:417–417
Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AY (2011) National water footprint accounts: the green, blue and gray
water footprint of production and consumption 2, Appendices. http://www.waterfootprint.org/
Reports/Report50-NationalWaterFootprints-Vol2.pdf
Meyfroidt P, Lambin EF, Erb KH, Hertel TW (2013) Globalization of land use: distant drivers of
land change and geographic displacement of land use. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 5:438–444
Molden D (2009) The devil is in the detail. Nat Rep Clim Change 3:116–117
Nykvist B, Persson Å, Moberg F, Persson L, Cornell S, Rockström J (2013) National environmental
performance on planetary boundaries: a study for the swedish environmental protection agency.
Stockholm Resilience Center & Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
O’Brien M, Schütz H, Bringezu S (2015) The land footprint of the EU bioeconomy: monitoring
tools, gaps and needs. Land Use Policy 47:235–246
Peters GP (2008) From production-based to consumption-based national emission inventories. Ecol
Econ 65:13–23
PRB (Population Reference Bureau) (2009) 2009 World population data sheet. http://www.prb.org/
pdf09/09wpds_eng.pdf
Puolamaa M, Kaplas M, Reinikainen T (1996) Index of environmental friendliness: a methodological study. Official Statistics of Finland, Helsinki, Finland
Précédent

- 125/134

Suivant