202
J. Kubiak and S. Machula
Table 9.1
Factors for estimation of lake catchment as biogenic matter suppliers by Bajkiewicz-Grabowska [58, 104, 107] and Bajkiewicz-Grabowska et al.
[108]
Indicator
Punctation (groups)
0
1
2
3
Lake density coefficient
<10
10–40
40–150
>150
Balance type
Drain
Outflow
Flow-through
Density of river network
<0.5
0.5–1.0
1.0–1.5
>1.5
Mean slope of direct catchment <5
5–10
10–20
>20
Closed drainage area of direct
catchment
>60
45–60
20–45
<20
Geological structure of direct
catchment
Clay
Sandy-clay
Clay-sandy
Sandy
Catchment use Direct catchment
use
Forest, marsh,
agriculture-forest,
pasture-agricultural-forestry
Forestry-agricultural,
pasture-agricultural
Agricultural,
pasture-forestry-agricultural
with buildings, forest with
buildings
Forest—agricultural with
buildings,
pasture—agricultural with
buildings, agriculture with
buildings
J. Kubiak and S. Machula
Table 9.1
Factors for estimation of lake catchment as biogenic matter suppliers by Bajkiewicz-Grabowska [58, 104, 107] and Bajkiewicz-Grabowska et al.
[108]
Indicator
Punctation (groups)
0
1
2
3
Lake density coefficient
<10
10–40
40–150
>150
Balance type
Drain
Outflow
Flow-through
Density of river network
<0.5
0.5–1.0
1.0–1.5
>1.5
Mean slope of direct catchment <5
5–10
10–20
>20
Closed drainage area of direct
catchment
>60
45–60
20–45
<20
Geological structure of direct
catchment
Clay
Sandy-clay
Clay-sandy
Sandy
Catchment use Direct catchment
use
Forest, marsh,
agriculture-forest,
pasture-agricultural-forestry
Forestry-agricultural,
pasture-agricultural
Agricultural,
pasture-forestry-agricultural
with buildings, forest with
buildings
Forest—agricultural with
buildings,
pasture—agricultural with
buildings, agriculture with
buildings
