MATERIELS AND METHODS
To illustrate and summarize all the methods used, the Figure 7 and Table 7 provide a
comprehensive overview and comparison of the various methodologies employed and
parameters considered in this study.
2.3. Statistical analysis
To assess the reliability of all studied methods, the results were compared to a truth data
ground study conducted at the same studies sites by Sengouga et al (2019). Pearson’s
coefficient was computed at the 95% and 90 % significance levels, between the indexes of the
anthropogenic pressures and the EQR values relative to the Posidonia Rapid and Easy Index
(PREI).
To illustrate and summarize all the methods used, the Figure 7 and Table 7 provide a
comprehensive overview and comparison of the various methodologies employed and
parameters considered in this study.
2.3. Statistical analysis
To assess the reliability of all studied methods, the results were compared to a truth data
ground study conducted at the same studies sites by Sengouga et al (2019). Pearson’s
coefficient was computed at the 95% and 90 % significance levels, between the indexes of the
anthropogenic pressures and the EQR values relative to the Posidonia Rapid and Easy Index
(PREI).