168
Lalia BS, Kochkodan V, Hashaikeh R, Hilal N (2013) A review on membrane fabrication: structure,
properties and performance relationship. Desalination 326:77–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
desal.2013.06.016
Li X, Li J, Van der Bruggen B, Sun X, Shen J, Han W, Wang L (2015) Fouling behavior of polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes functionalized with sol–gel formed ZnO nanoparticles.
RSC Adv 63:50711–50719. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA05783C
Lin R, Hernandez BV, Ge L, Zhu Z (2018) Metal organic framework based mixed matrix membranes: an overview on filler/polymer interfaces. J Mater Chem A 6:293–312. https://doi.
org/10.1039/C7TA07294E
Liu F, Ma BR, Zhou D, Xiang YH, Xue LX (2014) Breaking through tradeoff of Polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes by zeolite 4A. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 186:113–120. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2013.11.044
Lu Y, Yu SL, Chai BX, Shun XD (2006) Effect of nanosized Al 2 O 3 -particle addition on PVDF
ultrafiltration membrane performance. J Membr Sci 276:162–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
memsci.2005.09.044
Luccio M, Nobrega R, Borges CP (2002) Microporous anisotropic phase inversion membranes
from bisphenol A polycarbonate: effect of additives to the polymer solution. J Appl Polym Sci
86:3085–3096. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.11338
Luo ML, Zhao JQ, Tang W, Pu CS (2005) Hydrophilic modification of poly (ether sulfone) ultrafiltration membrane surface by self-assembly of TiO 2 nanoparticles. Appl Surf Sci 1:76–84.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.11.054
Mendez R, Constant B, Garzon C, Nisar M, Nachtigall SMB, Quijada R (2017) Barrier, mechanical and conductive properties of polycaprolactam nanocomposites containing carbonbased particles: effect of the kind of particle. Polymer 130:10–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
polymer.2017.09.063
Meng F, Chae S-R, Drews A, Kraume M, Shin H-S, Yang F (2009) Recent advances in membrane
bioreactors (MBRs): membrane fouling and membrane material. Water Res 43:1489–1512.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.12.044
Méricq J-P, Mendret J, Brosillon S, Faur C (2015) High performance PVDF-TiO 2 membranes for
water treatment. Chem Eng Sci 123:283–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2014.10.047
Mohammed AS, Kapri A, Goel R (2011) Heavy metal pollution: source, impact, and remedies.
In: Khan M, Zaidi A, Goel R, Musarrat J (eds) Biomanagement of metal-contaminated soils,
Environmental Pollution, vol 20. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1–28
Mukherjee R, Bhunia P, De S (2016) Impact of graphene oxide on removal of heavy metals using
mixed matrix membrane. Chem Eng J 292:284–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.02.015
Mukherjee R, Bhunia P, De S (2019) Long term filtration modelling and scaling up of mixed
matrix ultrafiltration hollow fiber membrane: a case study of chromium(VI) removal. J Membr
Sci 570–571:204–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.10.026
Nasir AM, Goh PS, Abdullah MS, Ng BC, Ismail AF (2019a) Adsorptive nanocomposite
membranes for heavy metal remediation: recent progresses and challenges. Chemosphere
232:96–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.174
Nasir AM, Goh PS, Ismail AF (2019b) Highly adsorptive polysulfone/hydrous iron-nickelmanganese (PSF/HINM) nanocomposite hollow fiber membrane for synergistic arsenic
removal. Sep Purif Technol 213:162–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2018.12.040
Ng LY, Mohammad AW, Leo CP, Hilal N (2013) Polymeric membranes incorporate with metal/
metal oxide nanoparticles: a comprehensive review. Desalination 308:15–33. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.11.033
Oh SJ, Kim N, Lee YT (2009) Preparation and characterization of PVDF/TiO2organic–inorganic
composite membranes for fouling resistance improvement. J Membr Sci 345:13–20. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.08.003
Pan BJ, Pan BC, Zhang WM, Lv L, Zhang QX, Zheng SR (2009) Development of polymeric and
polymer-based hybrid adsorbents for pollutants removal from waters. Chem Eng J 151:19–29.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.02.036
Y. Yurekli
Lalia BS, Kochkodan V, Hashaikeh R, Hilal N (2013) A review on membrane fabrication: structure,
properties and performance relationship. Desalination 326:77–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
desal.2013.06.016
Li X, Li J, Van der Bruggen B, Sun X, Shen J, Han W, Wang L (2015) Fouling behavior of polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes functionalized with sol–gel formed ZnO nanoparticles.
RSC Adv 63:50711–50719. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA05783C
Lin R, Hernandez BV, Ge L, Zhu Z (2018) Metal organic framework based mixed matrix membranes: an overview on filler/polymer interfaces. J Mater Chem A 6:293–312. https://doi.
org/10.1039/C7TA07294E
Liu F, Ma BR, Zhou D, Xiang YH, Xue LX (2014) Breaking through tradeoff of Polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes by zeolite 4A. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 186:113–120. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2013.11.044
Lu Y, Yu SL, Chai BX, Shun XD (2006) Effect of nanosized Al 2 O 3 -particle addition on PVDF
ultrafiltration membrane performance. J Membr Sci 276:162–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
memsci.2005.09.044
Luccio M, Nobrega R, Borges CP (2002) Microporous anisotropic phase inversion membranes
from bisphenol A polycarbonate: effect of additives to the polymer solution. J Appl Polym Sci
86:3085–3096. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.11338
Luo ML, Zhao JQ, Tang W, Pu CS (2005) Hydrophilic modification of poly (ether sulfone) ultrafiltration membrane surface by self-assembly of TiO 2 nanoparticles. Appl Surf Sci 1:76–84.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.11.054
Mendez R, Constant B, Garzon C, Nisar M, Nachtigall SMB, Quijada R (2017) Barrier, mechanical and conductive properties of polycaprolactam nanocomposites containing carbonbased particles: effect of the kind of particle. Polymer 130:10–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
polymer.2017.09.063
Meng F, Chae S-R, Drews A, Kraume M, Shin H-S, Yang F (2009) Recent advances in membrane
bioreactors (MBRs): membrane fouling and membrane material. Water Res 43:1489–1512.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.12.044
Méricq J-P, Mendret J, Brosillon S, Faur C (2015) High performance PVDF-TiO 2 membranes for
water treatment. Chem Eng Sci 123:283–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2014.10.047
Mohammed AS, Kapri A, Goel R (2011) Heavy metal pollution: source, impact, and remedies.
In: Khan M, Zaidi A, Goel R, Musarrat J (eds) Biomanagement of metal-contaminated soils,
Environmental Pollution, vol 20. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1–28
Mukherjee R, Bhunia P, De S (2016) Impact of graphene oxide on removal of heavy metals using
mixed matrix membrane. Chem Eng J 292:284–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.02.015
Mukherjee R, Bhunia P, De S (2019) Long term filtration modelling and scaling up of mixed
matrix ultrafiltration hollow fiber membrane: a case study of chromium(VI) removal. J Membr
Sci 570–571:204–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.10.026
Nasir AM, Goh PS, Abdullah MS, Ng BC, Ismail AF (2019a) Adsorptive nanocomposite
membranes for heavy metal remediation: recent progresses and challenges. Chemosphere
232:96–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.174
Nasir AM, Goh PS, Ismail AF (2019b) Highly adsorptive polysulfone/hydrous iron-nickelmanganese (PSF/HINM) nanocomposite hollow fiber membrane for synergistic arsenic
removal. Sep Purif Technol 213:162–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2018.12.040
Ng LY, Mohammad AW, Leo CP, Hilal N (2013) Polymeric membranes incorporate with metal/
metal oxide nanoparticles: a comprehensive review. Desalination 308:15–33. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.11.033
Oh SJ, Kim N, Lee YT (2009) Preparation and characterization of PVDF/TiO2organic–inorganic
composite membranes for fouling resistance improvement. J Membr Sci 345:13–20. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2009.08.003
Pan BJ, Pan BC, Zhang WM, Lv L, Zhang QX, Zheng SR (2009) Development of polymeric and
polymer-based hybrid adsorbents for pollutants removal from waters. Chem Eng J 151:19–29.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.02.036
Y. Yurekli