104
Table 4.1 (continued)
Fe intercalated–montmorillonite complex
Cu(II)
173 mmol/kg
–
Langmuir
model
Zhu et al. (2011)
Cellulose–montmorillonite nanocomposite
Cr(VI)
22.2 mg/g
Second-order kinetics
Langmuir
model
Kumar et al.
(2012)
Magnetite–polyethylenimine montmorillonite
Cr(VI)
8.77 mg/g
–
Langmuir
model
Larraza et al.
(2012)
Poly(methacrylamide-co-acrylic acid)–
montmorillonite nanocomposites
Cu(II)
–
Poly(methacrylamide-co-acrylic
acid)–montmorillonite
nanocomposites
–
Barati et al.
(2013)
Chitosan–montmorillonite magnetic microspherebased geopolymer
Cr(VI)
58.82 mg/g
Pseudo-second order
Langmuir
model
Chen et al. (2013)
Montmorillonite–polyacrylamide/montmorillonite–
polyacrylate nanocomposites
Fe(III)
2.94 × 10
−3
 mol/g –
Langmuir
model
Natkański et al.
(2013)
Chitosan–montmorillonite biocomposite
Cu(II)
1.23 mg/g
Pseudo-second order
Temkin model Pereira et al.
(2013)
Exfoliated polypyrrole–organically modified
montmorillonite composite
Cr(VI)
119.34 mg/g
Pseudo-second order
Langmuir
model
Setshedi et al.
(2013)
Organically modified montmorillonite (OMMT)
nanocomposites
Cu(II)
–
Pseudo-second order
–
Wu et al. (2013)
Lipopeptide–montmorillonite intercalated
composite
Cu(II)
49.80 mg/g
Pseudo-second order
Langmuir
model
Zhu et al. (2013)
Zn(II)
48.25 mg/g
Cd(II)
52.19 mg/g
Pb(II)
62.90 mg/g
Hg(II)
38.22 mg/g
Lignocellulose-g-acrylic acid–montmorillonite
nanocomposite
Pb(II)
918.2 mg/g
Pseudo-second order
Langmuir
model
Du et al. (2014)
Cd(II)
482.5 mg/g
Adsorbent
Adsorbate
Adsorption
capacity (mg/g)
Kinetic model
Isotherm
Reference
J. Hızal and M. Yılmazoğlu