1 3
Topics in Current Chemistry (2019) 377:22
Figure 5 shows the LSRPA profiles on flat photocatalytic plates made with different CeO 2 –TiO 2 ratios, illuminated on both sides with visible light.
(31)
e
a,s
x
=
∑
q ,in
x
A ,f
Fig. 4 Schematic representation
of a multilayer photocatalytic
wall and the reflected and
transmitted radiation fluxes.
Reprinted with permission from
[19]. Copyright 2016 Wiley–
VCH
Fig. 5 Local surface rate of photon absorption (Einstein cm
−2
s
−1 ) under visible irradiation on flat photocatalytic plates. Upper row: Ti and 0.025CeTi. Lower row: 0.05CeTi and 0.25CeTi. Reprinted with
permission from [43]. Copyright 2014 Elsevier
275
Reprinted from the journal
Topics in Current Chemistry (2019) 377:22
Figure 5 shows the LSRPA profiles on flat photocatalytic plates made with different CeO 2 –TiO 2 ratios, illuminated on both sides with visible light.
(31)
e
a,s
x
=
∑
q ,in
x
A ,f
Fig. 4 Schematic representation
of a multilayer photocatalytic
wall and the reflected and
transmitted radiation fluxes.
Reprinted with permission from
[19]. Copyright 2016 Wiley–
VCH
Fig. 5 Local surface rate of photon absorption (Einstein cm
−2
s
−1 ) under visible irradiation on flat photocatalytic plates. Upper row: Ti and 0.025CeTi. Lower row: 0.05CeTi and 0.25CeTi. Reprinted with
permission from [43]. Copyright 2014 Elsevier
275
Reprinted from the journal