362
J. Mak et al.
Meteorol. Appl. 12, 329–341 (2005)
4. M.D. Gibson, S. Kundu, M. Satish, Dispersion model evaluation of PM 2.5 , NO x and SO 2 from
point and major line sources in Nova Scotia, Canada using AERMOD gaussian plume air
dispersion model. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 5, 157–167 (2013)
5. S.A. Guerra, Innovative dispersion modeling: practices to achieve a reasonable level of conservatism in AERMOD modeling demonstrations. EM Mag. 25–29 (2014)
6. Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Parks, and Conservation (MEPC), Guideline A-11: Air
Dispersion Modelling Guideline for Ontario (2017)
7. Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Parks, and Conservation (MEPC), Technical Bulletin:
Using Combined Assessment of Modelled and Monitored (CAMM) Results to Refine EmissionRate Estimates (2011)
8. W. Qian, A. Venkatram, Performance of steady-state dispersion models under low wind-speed
conditions. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 138, 475–491 (2010)
9. R.G. Rhoads, Accuracy of Air Quality Models: Staff Report. U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC (Docket No. A–80–46, II–G–6) (1981)
10. A.S. Rood, Performance evaluation of AERMOD, CALPUFF, and legacy air dispersion models
using the winter validation tracer study dataset. Atmos. Environ. 707–720 (2014)
11. K. Silverman, E. Sargent, Q. Zeyuan, Comparison of the industrial source complex and AERMOD dispersion models: case study for human health risk assessment. J. Air Waste Manag.
Assoc. 1439–1446 (2007)
J. Mak et al.
Meteorol. Appl. 12, 329–341 (2005)
4. M.D. Gibson, S. Kundu, M. Satish, Dispersion model evaluation of PM 2.5 , NO x and SO 2 from
point and major line sources in Nova Scotia, Canada using AERMOD gaussian plume air
dispersion model. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 5, 157–167 (2013)
5. S.A. Guerra, Innovative dispersion modeling: practices to achieve a reasonable level of conservatism in AERMOD modeling demonstrations. EM Mag. 25–29 (2014)
6. Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Parks, and Conservation (MEPC), Guideline A-11: Air
Dispersion Modelling Guideline for Ontario (2017)
7. Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Parks, and Conservation (MEPC), Technical Bulletin:
Using Combined Assessment of Modelled and Monitored (CAMM) Results to Refine EmissionRate Estimates (2011)
8. W. Qian, A. Venkatram, Performance of steady-state dispersion models under low wind-speed
conditions. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 138, 475–491 (2010)
9. R.G. Rhoads, Accuracy of Air Quality Models: Staff Report. U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC (Docket No. A–80–46, II–G–6) (1981)
10. A.S. Rood, Performance evaluation of AERMOD, CALPUFF, and legacy air dispersion models
using the winter validation tracer study dataset. Atmos. Environ. 707–720 (2014)
11. K. Silverman, E. Sargent, Q. Zeyuan, Comparison of the industrial source complex and AERMOD dispersion models: case study for human health risk assessment. J. Air Waste Manag.
Assoc. 1439–1446 (2007)