18 Incomplete Pairwise Comparisons Method for Estimating …
269
Table 18.9 Criteria weights for selection to MAH
No. Criteria
Acronyms W T
W B
W
1
Optimal distance from the center of Moscow ODC
0.1593 0.1648 0.1624
2
Airport capacity
ACC
0.066
0.0683 0.0673
3
Quality and quantity of runways
QQRC
0.1276 0.1320 0.1301
4
Aerodrome infrastructure
ADIC
0.1364 0.1412 0.1390
5
Airport infrastructure
APIC
0.1399 0.1259 0.1330
6
Land resources
LRC
0.1446 0.1132 0.1282
7
Infrastructure of other transport
ITC
0.154
0.1594 0.1570
8
Cargo terminal quality
CTC
0.0213 0.0253 0.0233
9
International status
ISC
0.0171 0.0234 0.0201
10
Co-location
CLC
0.0187 0.0256 0.0219
11
Ownership form
OSC
0.0152 0.0207 0.0178
• Optimal distance from the center of Moscow.
• Infrastructure of other transport.
Evaluation of these parameters should be taken more carefully in further research.
Also, the presence of the criterion of optimal distance from the center of Moscow in
this list confirms the correctness of imposing restrictions on the estimated airports
by those in a radius of 300 km.
The most unimportant criteria are identified too:
• Ownership form.
• International status.
• Co-location.
• Cargo terminal quality.
They may not be considered in further researches of the problem because of
their insignificance, cargo terminal characteristics, presence of international status,
co-location criterion, form of ownership and, to some extent, airport capacity.
18.4 Conclusions
The obtained criterion weights were used to calculate the integral risk of airport
modernization in order to select MAH candidate airports. In addition to the application of criteria for the selection and evaluation of the contribution of the criteria, the
results obtained are useful in themselves: the criteria that can most affect the risk of
modernizing the airport, and those that cannot be considered in further research of
the problem, were clearly distinguished.
269
Table 18.9 Criteria weights for selection to MAH
No. Criteria
Acronyms W T
W B
W
1
Optimal distance from the center of Moscow ODC
0.1593 0.1648 0.1624
2
Airport capacity
ACC
0.066
0.0683 0.0673
3
Quality and quantity of runways
QQRC
0.1276 0.1320 0.1301
4
Aerodrome infrastructure
ADIC
0.1364 0.1412 0.1390
5
Airport infrastructure
APIC
0.1399 0.1259 0.1330
6
Land resources
LRC
0.1446 0.1132 0.1282
7
Infrastructure of other transport
ITC
0.154
0.1594 0.1570
8
Cargo terminal quality
CTC
0.0213 0.0253 0.0233
9
International status
ISC
0.0171 0.0234 0.0201
10
Co-location
CLC
0.0187 0.0256 0.0219
11
Ownership form
OSC
0.0152 0.0207 0.0178
• Optimal distance from the center of Moscow.
• Infrastructure of other transport.
Evaluation of these parameters should be taken more carefully in further research.
Also, the presence of the criterion of optimal distance from the center of Moscow in
this list confirms the correctness of imposing restrictions on the estimated airports
by those in a radius of 300 km.
The most unimportant criteria are identified too:
• Ownership form.
• International status.
• Co-location.
• Cargo terminal quality.
They may not be considered in further researches of the problem because of
their insignificance, cargo terminal characteristics, presence of international status,
co-location criterion, form of ownership and, to some extent, airport capacity.
18.4 Conclusions
The obtained criterion weights were used to calculate the integral risk of airport
modernization in order to select MAH candidate airports. In addition to the application of criteria for the selection and evaluation of the contribution of the criteria, the
results obtained are useful in themselves: the criteria that can most affect the risk of
modernizing the airport, and those that cannot be considered in further research of
the problem, were clearly distinguished.