4.6 Summary
99
Fig. 4.15 Comparisons of test data and numerical results of a test 1, b test 2, c test 3, d test 4, e test
5, f test 6, g test 7, h test 8, i test 9, j test 10, k test 11, reprinted from Ren et al. (2016), copyright
2020, with permission from Elsevier
1. The optimal UHPCC with higher impact resistance, good workability, low-costs
and energy saving was prepared under ordinary procedures without temperature
and pressure curing;