7.6 Stability of Curvilinear Euler-Bernoulli Beams in Temperature Fields
259
Fig. 7.21 Temperature load intensity versus w(0.5) and heat boundary conditions type for different
curvature parameter k x [reprinted with permission from the International Journal of Non-linear
Mechanics publishers]
Fig. 7.22 Dependencies q versus w(0.5) for different k x [reprinted with permission from the
International Journal of Non-linear Mechanics publishers]
4, we have found that with an increase in the curvature parameter k x , the maximum
beam deflection w decreases.
In what follows, we study the dependencies q (w) reported in Fig. 7.22 for different types of the temperature field (types 4, 5 in Table 7.14) and the corresponding
boundary conditions of the simple-simple support for the intensity of the temperature
load T = 100
◦ C.
It has been found that for the type 4 temperature field, for k x = 12, . . . , 36, the
curvature parameter implies an increase in the critical load q cr . On the contrary, for
259
Fig. 7.21 Temperature load intensity versus w(0.5) and heat boundary conditions type for different
curvature parameter k x [reprinted with permission from the International Journal of Non-linear
Mechanics publishers]
Fig. 7.22 Dependencies q versus w(0.5) for different k x [reprinted with permission from the
International Journal of Non-linear Mechanics publishers]
4, we have found that with an increase in the curvature parameter k x , the maximum
beam deflection w decreases.
In what follows, we study the dependencies q (w) reported in Fig. 7.22 for different types of the temperature field (types 4, 5 in Table 7.14) and the corresponding
boundary conditions of the simple-simple support for the intensity of the temperature
load T = 100
◦ C.
It has been found that for the type 4 temperature field, for k x = 12, . . . , 36, the
curvature parameter implies an increase in the critical load q cr . On the contrary, for