204
Table 12.1 The list of sustainability indicators obtained from the native communities
Theory
approach
Element of importance for sustainability
Sub-index Indicator
Value
Cucapá Kumiai
Pa
Ipai
SLM
Maintains or encourages the goods on which livelihoods depend Ecologic 1. Type of use
0.57
0.68
0.71
2. Management practices
1
1
1
3. Conservation
0.4
0.61
0.64
CMSD
Adequate or no destructive use of natural resources
4. Population’s perception
0.69
0.71
0.77
BV
New relation with nature, not only as reservoir or repository
5. Adaptation strategies
0.49
0.51
0.29
SLM
X
Political 6.Respect territory
0.75
0.42
0.78
CMSD
Capacity to create their own productive organization
7. Socio-ecological conflicts
0
0.5
0.5
BV
Respect to the indigenous leadership
SLM
May deal and recover from stress and changes
Social
8. Social participation
0.48
0.65
0.68
Provides for future generations
CMDS
Increases quality of life
Social control (food, health, education, housing, information, and
recreation)
Local participation
9. Hybridization in medical
knowledge
0.61
0.73
0.77
10. Hybridization in alimentary
knowledge
0.55
0.71
0.75
BV
Improvement of quality of life
Food sovereignty
Encouragement of participation
Intercultural education
11. Hybridization in educational
knowledge
0.81
0.95
0.91
12. Future
0.51
0.66
0.86
SLM
Economically sustainable when it is effective
Economic 13. Livelihoods strategies
0.71
0.67
0.69
CMDS
Regulation of the community’s economic interchanges of the
community
Food sovereignty
Diversity of productive activities
14. Sowing/harvesting
0.29
0.64
0.44
15. Breeding/hunting
0.2
0.82
0.51
0.75
0.38
0.51
BV
Built of a just, democratic, solidary economic system
D. Galván-Martínez et al.
Table 12.1 The list of sustainability indicators obtained from the native communities
Theory
approach
Element of importance for sustainability
Sub-index Indicator
Value
Cucapá Kumiai
Pa
Ipai
SLM
Maintains or encourages the goods on which livelihoods depend Ecologic 1. Type of use
0.57
0.68
0.71
2. Management practices
1
1
1
3. Conservation
0.4
0.61
0.64
CMSD
Adequate or no destructive use of natural resources
4. Population’s perception
0.69
0.71
0.77
BV
New relation with nature, not only as reservoir or repository
5. Adaptation strategies
0.49
0.51
0.29
SLM
X
Political 6.Respect territory
0.75
0.42
0.78
CMSD
Capacity to create their own productive organization
7. Socio-ecological conflicts
0
0.5
0.5
BV
Respect to the indigenous leadership
SLM
May deal and recover from stress and changes
Social
8. Social participation
0.48
0.65
0.68
Provides for future generations
CMDS
Increases quality of life
Social control (food, health, education, housing, information, and
recreation)
Local participation
9. Hybridization in medical
knowledge
0.61
0.73
0.77
10. Hybridization in alimentary
knowledge
0.55
0.71
0.75
BV
Improvement of quality of life
Food sovereignty
Encouragement of participation
Intercultural education
11. Hybridization in educational
knowledge
0.81
0.95
0.91
12. Future
0.51
0.66
0.86
SLM
Economically sustainable when it is effective
Economic 13. Livelihoods strategies
0.71
0.67
0.69
CMDS
Regulation of the community’s economic interchanges of the
community
Food sovereignty
Diversity of productive activities
14. Sowing/harvesting
0.29
0.64
0.44
15. Breeding/hunting
0.2
0.82
0.51
0.75
0.38
0.51
BV
Built of a just, democratic, solidary economic system
D. Galván-Martínez et al.