mixtures of ligands is the inability to identify which compound(s) caused the
perturbation of resonances as well as the throughput of the experiment.
A key advantage of protein-observed NMR methods is the ability to qualitatively
and quantitatively asses binding affinities. For a biomolecular binding interaction, K d
is defined as the ratio of rate constants k off /k on where k on can be estimated to be the
rate of diffusion for small molecules (although this may not always be true). Thus,
K d can be estimated from observing k off . On the NMR timescale, compounds sample
the protein-bound and unbound states at different rates that can be classified as fast,
slow, or intermediate exchange (Fig. 9). A qualitative assessment of the strength of
binding can be gleaned by the nature of the protein resonance response. There are
three binding regimes on the NMR timescale: (1) fast chemical exchange (change in
chemical shift (typically for ligands with low affinity K d ¼ high μM to mM)),
(2) slow chemical exchange (two resonances are present representing the free and
bound states of the ligand (typical K d < 1 μM)), and (3) intermediate chemical
exchange (broadening and movement of the resonance (K d typically ~1–100 μM)).
To calculate a K d of a ligand (or protein) in fast chemical exchange, a titration of
various ligand concentrations, ranging from low μM to mM, is performed. The
change in chemical shift of the protein resonance is plotted and fitted to Eq. 1:
Fig. 9 Examples of resonance behavior indicative of the three chemical exchange regimes.
Examples are of protein-observed
19
F NMR spectra, but similar behavior is observed using other
NMR-active isotopes. Arrows indicate the direction of the free to bound resonance and magnitude
of chemical shift change (Δδ)
Applied Biophysics for Bromodomain Drug Discovery
309
Précédent

- 315/569

Suivant