181
(e) General Assembly resolution on 28 July 2010: The Human Right to Water
and Sanitation, GA/10967.
(f) FAO International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and
Agriculture.
(g) United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
(h) Describe examples of customary international law as applied to (a) food;
(b) energy; (c) water; and (d) two or more of food, energy, and water.
2. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the UN System to integrating food,
energy, and water concerns.
3. Describe how the human rights obligations of respect, protect, and fulfill discussed in the context of food and water might be applied to energy.
4. Describe the trade-offs and challenges of applying the human rights obligations
of respect, protect, and fulfill to food, energy, and water simultaneously.
5. Describe an example of international law related to shared resources in the
area of (a) food; (b) energy; (c) water; and (d) two or more of food, energy,
and water.
6. Describe one or more examples of the principle of equitable and reasonable
utilization in the area of food, energy, and water.
7. Describe one or more examples of the no-harm rule in the area of food, energy,
and water.
8. Describe one or more examples of the principle of cooperation in the area of
food, energy, and water.
9. Discuss the competing principles and trade-offs of the ICJ decision in the
Gabčikovo-Nagymaros case.
10. Discuss the competing principles and trade-offs of the ICJ decision in the Pulp
Mills case.
11. Discuss the competing principles and trade-offs of the EU Court of Justice
decision in the Schwartz Sulm River case.
12. Discuss the challenges of international food governance.
13. Discuss the challenges of international energy governance.
14. Discuss the challenges of international water governance.
15. Discuss the challenges of integrating international FEW governance.
References
Belinskij, A. (2015). Water–energy–food Nexus within the framework of international water law.
Water, 7, 5396–5415.
Bradbrook, A. J. (1996). Energy law as an academic discipline. Journal of Energy and Natural
Resources Law, 194, 194.
Bradbrook, A. J., Gardam, J. G., & Cormier, M. (2008). A human dimension to the energy debate:
Access to modern energy services. Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, 26(4),
526–552.
Chico, D., Aldaya, M. M., Flachsbarth, I., & Garrido, A. (2014). Virtual water trade, food security and sustainability: Lessons from Latin America and Spain. In P. Martinez-Santos, M. M.
6 International Governance
(e) General Assembly resolution on 28 July 2010: The Human Right to Water
and Sanitation, GA/10967.
(f) FAO International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and
Agriculture.
(g) United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
(h) Describe examples of customary international law as applied to (a) food;
(b) energy; (c) water; and (d) two or more of food, energy, and water.
2. Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the UN System to integrating food,
energy, and water concerns.
3. Describe how the human rights obligations of respect, protect, and fulfill discussed in the context of food and water might be applied to energy.
4. Describe the trade-offs and challenges of applying the human rights obligations
of respect, protect, and fulfill to food, energy, and water simultaneously.
5. Describe an example of international law related to shared resources in the
area of (a) food; (b) energy; (c) water; and (d) two or more of food, energy,
and water.
6. Describe one or more examples of the principle of equitable and reasonable
utilization in the area of food, energy, and water.
7. Describe one or more examples of the no-harm rule in the area of food, energy,
and water.
8. Describe one or more examples of the principle of cooperation in the area of
food, energy, and water.
9. Discuss the competing principles and trade-offs of the ICJ decision in the
Gabčikovo-Nagymaros case.
10. Discuss the competing principles and trade-offs of the ICJ decision in the Pulp
Mills case.
11. Discuss the competing principles and trade-offs of the EU Court of Justice
decision in the Schwartz Sulm River case.
12. Discuss the challenges of international food governance.
13. Discuss the challenges of international energy governance.
14. Discuss the challenges of international water governance.
15. Discuss the challenges of integrating international FEW governance.
References
Belinskij, A. (2015). Water–energy–food Nexus within the framework of international water law.
Water, 7, 5396–5415.
Bradbrook, A. J. (1996). Energy law as an academic discipline. Journal of Energy and Natural
Resources Law, 194, 194.
Bradbrook, A. J., Gardam, J. G., & Cormier, M. (2008). A human dimension to the energy debate:
Access to modern energy services. Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, 26(4),
526–552.
Chico, D., Aldaya, M. M., Flachsbarth, I., & Garrido, A. (2014). Virtual water trade, food security and sustainability: Lessons from Latin America and Spain. In P. Martinez-Santos, M. M.
6 International Governance