pollutant emissions in SI engines. After ignition by the spark, a turbulent premixed
flame propagates through the premixed fuel–air charge in the engine, rapidly
converting the fuel into combustion products and producing the thermal energy
and pressure that drive the engine. A recent study observing flames in optically
accessible engines has shown that ethanol flames propagate faster than butanol,
gasoline, and iso-octane (Aleiferis et al. 2013). Recent papers still do not produce
consistent trends in relative NO x potential of gasoline–alcohol blends (Karavalakis
et al. 2014; Canakci et al. 2013; Gravalos et al. 2013; Balki et al. 2014), while
agreement is growing on the risk of a potential increase in oxygenated emissions,
such as formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and ketones (Agarwal 2007; Lynd et al. 1991;
Kohse-Höinghaus et al. 2010; Saxena and Williams 2007).
Dealing with biodiesel, when compared to diesel, it has a 9% lower volumetric
energy content, due to its oxygen content (Agarwal 2007; Lapuerta et al. 2008). At
high-temperatures, the reactivity of long-chain esters is nearly indistinguishable for
saturated and unsaturated esters (Wang et al. 2013), while the unsaturated esters
(with double bonds) have generally increased low-temperature ignition delay times
and reduced cetane numbers (Westbrook 2013; Westbrook et al. 2013). Biodiesels
have the positive aspect of reducing engine deposits and coking, compared to
petroleum-derived fuels (Graboski and McCormick 1998; Xue et al. 2011). NO x
emissions have been observed to increase for biodiesel compared to petro-diesel for
many engine tests (Lapuerta et al. 2008; Graboski and McCormick 1998; Xue et al.
2011; Coniglio et al. 2013; Lai et al. 2011; Sun et al. 2010; Giakoumis et al. 2012;
Palash et al. 2013; Varatharajan and Cheralathan 2012; Szybist et al. 2007; Hoekman
Table 1.7 Biofuels properties
Property
Fossil diesel
(EN590)
Biodiesel
(EN 14214)
HVO
Bioethanol
Gasoline
Density
(kg/m
3 at
15
C)
820–845
(Vásquez
et al. 2017)
860–900
(Vásquez
et al. 2017)
775–785
(Vásquez
et al. 2017)
785 (Ku and
Tu 2005)
720–780
(Christensen
et al. 2011)
Viscosity
(mm
2
/s at
40
C)
2–4.5
(Vásquez
et al. 2017)
3.5–5.0
(Vásquez
et al. 2017)
2.9–3.5
(Vásquez
et al. 2017)
1.1 (Ku and
Tu 2005)
0.37–0.44
(Christensen
et al. 2011)
Heating
value
(MJ/kg)
43 (Vásquez
et al. 2017)
38 (Vásquez
et al. 2017)
44 (Vásquez
et al. 2017)
26.87
(Agarwal
2007)
44 (Al-Hasan
2003)
Cetane
number
51>
(Vásquez
et al. 2017)
51>
(Vásquez
et al. 2017)
84–99
(Vásquez
et al. 2017)
6 (Yilmaz
2012)
n.a.
Sulfur
content
(mg/kg)
<10
(Vásquez
et al. 2017)
<1 (Vásquez
et al. 2017)
0 (Vásquez
et al. 2017)
0 (Agarwal
2007)
7 (RodríguezAntón et al.
2015)
Oxygen
content
(wt%)
0 (Vásquez
et al. 2017)
11 (Vásquez
et al. 2017)
0 (Vásquez
et al. 2017)]
5
(RodríguezAntón et al.
2015)
2.7
(RodríguezAntón et al.
2015)
ÃCalculated
28
P. Bartocci et al.
Précédent

- 41/349

Suivant