Table 1.2
Brief review of treatment technologies assessments for the reuse of soil-leaching solutions
Method
Treatment
technology
Contaminant
removal yield
(%)
Extractant
recovery yield
(%)
Reagent
Advantages
Inconvenients
References
Physical
Air-stripping
Naph 20–60
TCE 30–80
S anionic ~100
High reactant
recovery
Low removal yield at
high C
s
Lipe (1996)
Pervaporation
BTEX 63–74
S nonionic 90
4.7
€ m
À3
of
treated solution
Need prefiltration
May need
reconcentration step
Low
flux at high C
s
Sabatini (1998)
TCE 5–90
S anionic ~100
Abou-Nemeh et al.
(1999)
PCE 96
S anionic ~100
Vane (2001)
TCE/PCE 90–95 S nonionic
Kim (2007)
Toluene 10–60
S nonionic
Topf (2013)
Ultrafiltration
BTEX
> 90
S nonionic
46–80
Single step
treatment
High removal
yield/125
€ m
À3
Low S recovery from
concentrated leachates
Sabatini (1998)
PAHs 90–99 9
S 5–80
Hanafiah
et al. (2018)
Physicochemical Sorption
Phen 90
S ~ 88–96
PAC
Low energy
LTT
Ahn (2007, 2008a,
2010)
HCB 80–99
S ~ 80–90
PAC
–
Wan (2011)
MTE
! 90
ChAg 30–100
resin
Ahmed Mohamed
et al. (2013)
Precipitation
• Neutralization
MTEs 80–90
S nonionic 78
conc.
H
2 SO
4
Requires concentration
Hong (2002b)
MTEs
> 90
ChAg ~ 90
S
2À
(Na,
Ca)
Fast, effective
Dangerous
Hong (1999,
2002b)
MTEs
! 68
ChAg
! 78
FeS
Low cost
LTT/ LWV
Efligenir et al.
(2013)
MTEs
ChAg
DTC
Effective, fast
Too expensive
Xie and Marshall
(2001)
42
N. Fatin-Rouge
Précédent

- 53/437

Suivant