scale land acquisitions for plantation development or household-level decisions for
engagement in smallholder production (e.g. Onoji et al. 2016; Terry 2007; Waswa
et al. 2012; Arndt et al. 2011; Romijn et al. 2014; Timko et al. 2014; van Eijck et al.
2014; von Maltitz et al. 2016). However, many studies also point to the complementarity of industrial crops and food crops in smallholder settings that have
positive food security outcomes (e.g. Wiggins et al. 2015), especially through
Fig. 3.12 Number of studies for each impact mechanism across all spatial scales. Note: Studies are
double counted if they consider more than one food security pillar
Fig. 3.13 Effect of different mechanisms on food security for all studies. Note: The total number of
studies in this figure is lower to Fig. 3.11, as some studies focus on multiple crops and/or impact
mechanisms
3 Linking Industrial Crop Production and Food Security in Sub-Saharan Africa:. . .
111
engagement in smallholder production (e.g. Onoji et al. 2016; Terry 2007; Waswa
et al. 2012; Arndt et al. 2011; Romijn et al. 2014; Timko et al. 2014; van Eijck et al.
2014; von Maltitz et al. 2016). However, many studies also point to the complementarity of industrial crops and food crops in smallholder settings that have
positive food security outcomes (e.g. Wiggins et al. 2015), especially through
Fig. 3.12 Number of studies for each impact mechanism across all spatial scales. Note: Studies are
double counted if they consider more than one food security pillar
Fig. 3.13 Effect of different mechanisms on food security for all studies. Note: The total number of
studies in this figure is lower to Fig. 3.11, as some studies focus on multiple crops and/or impact
mechanisms
3 Linking Industrial Crop Production and Food Security in Sub-Saharan Africa:. . .
111