Chapter 3
Microbial Indicators of Bioremediation:
Potential and Success
Sarita K. Yadav
Contents
3.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
3.2 Bioremediation: A Better Approach . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 86
3.3 Criteria for the Selection of Bioremediation Techniques . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88
3.4 Types of Bioremediation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
3.4.1 Biostimulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
3.4.2 Bioaugmentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
3.4.3 Phytoremediation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
3.5 Parameters Affecting Bioremediation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
3.5.1 Energy Sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
3.5.2 Bioavailability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
3.5.3 Bioactivity and Biochemistry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
3.5.4 Nontechnical Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
3.5.5 Nonscientific Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
3.6 Microbial Populations for Bioremediation Processes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
3.7 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
Abstract The human race has been involved in lot many activities on energy
reservoirs, seeking the commercialization of agriculture and swift in industrial
growth apart from mining activities, which has led to environmental pollution by
many folds. There are a number of reasons for this environmental pollution; ingress
of heavy metals into ecosystem, nuclear wastes as part of residue created due to
nuclear energy power stations or atomic research activities, uncontrolled utilization
of pesticides in our farmers, greenhouse gases and hydrocarbons generated due to
various human activities are to name a few of them. If bioremediation activities are to
be carried out successfully, they require a lot of time, but time and again have proved
to be successful. In both ex situ and in situ ways, it is possible to carry out
bioremediation.
S. K. Yadav (*)
Regional Centre of Organic Farming, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, Ministry of
Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2021
D. G. Panpatte, Y. K. Jhala (eds.), Microbial Rejuvenation of Polluted Environment,
Microorganisms for Sustainability 25, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7447-4_3
85
Microbial Indicators of Bioremediation:
Potential and Success
Sarita K. Yadav
Contents
3.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
3.2 Bioremediation: A Better Approach . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 86
3.3 Criteria for the Selection of Bioremediation Techniques . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88
3.4 Types of Bioremediation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
3.4.1 Biostimulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
3.4.2 Bioaugmentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
3.4.3 Phytoremediation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
3.5 Parameters Affecting Bioremediation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
3.5.1 Energy Sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
3.5.2 Bioavailability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94
3.5.3 Bioactivity and Biochemistry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
3.5.4 Nontechnical Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
3.5.5 Nonscientific Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
3.6 Microbial Populations for Bioremediation Processes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
3.7 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
Abstract The human race has been involved in lot many activities on energy
reservoirs, seeking the commercialization of agriculture and swift in industrial
growth apart from mining activities, which has led to environmental pollution by
many folds. There are a number of reasons for this environmental pollution; ingress
of heavy metals into ecosystem, nuclear wastes as part of residue created due to
nuclear energy power stations or atomic research activities, uncontrolled utilization
of pesticides in our farmers, greenhouse gases and hydrocarbons generated due to
various human activities are to name a few of them. If bioremediation activities are to
be carried out successfully, they require a lot of time, but time and again have proved
to be successful. In both ex situ and in situ ways, it is possible to carry out
bioremediation.
S. K. Yadav (*)
Regional Centre of Organic Farming, Department of Agriculture and Cooperation, Ministry of
Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India
© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2021
D. G. Panpatte, Y. K. Jhala (eds.), Microbial Rejuvenation of Polluted Environment,
Microorganisms for Sustainability 25, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7447-4_3
85