202 Pía Marchegiani and Louisa Parks
Giorgi, A. (2018). Religioni di Minoranza tra Europa e Laicità Locale. Milano: Mimesis
Edizioni.
Jonas, H., Bavikatte, K., and Shrumm, H. (2010). Community Protocols and Access and
Benefit Sharing. Asian Biotechnology and Development Review, 12(3), 49–77.
Marchegiani, P., Hoglund Hellgren, J., and Gomez, L. (2018). Lithium Extraction in Argentina: a Case Study on its Social and Environmental Impacts. Buenos Aires: Fundacion
Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (FARN).
Marchegiani, P., Morgera, E., and Parks, L. (2020). Indigenous Peoples’ Rights to Natural Resources in Argentina: The Challenges of Impact Assessment, Consent and Fair
and Equitable Benefit-Sharing in Cases of Lithium Mining. The International Journal of
Human Rights, 24(2–3), 224–240.
McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., and Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of Contention. Leiden: Cambridge University Press.
Meyer, D. S. (2004). Protest and Political Opportunities. Annual Review of Sociology, 30,
124–145.
Morgera, E., Tsioumani, E., and Buck, M. (2014). Unraveling the Nagoya Protocol. Leiden:
Brill | Nijhoff.
Nelson, F. (2010). Democratizing Natural Resource Governance: Searching for Institutional Change. In F. Nelson (Ed.), Community Rights, Conservation and Contested Land:
The Politics of Natural Resource Governance in Africa. London: Earthscan, 310–333.
Parks, L. (2020). Benefit-Sharing in Environmental Governance Local Experiences of a Global
Concept. Abingdon: Routledge.
della Porta, D., and Diani, M. (2005). Social Movements: An Introduction. Second ed.
Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
de Sousa Santos, B. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide. London:
Paradigm Publishers.
Tarrow, S. (1998). Power in Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tobin, B. (2013). Bridging the Nagoya Compliance Gap: The Fundamental Role of Customary Law in Protection of Indigenous Peoples’ Resource and Knowledge Rights.
Law, Environment and Development Journal, 9(13), 142–162.
Uggla, Y. (2010). What Is this Thing called ‘natural’? The Nature-Culture Divide in
Climate Change and Biodiversity Policy. Journal of Political Ecology, 17(1), 79–91.
Vanhala, L. (2018). Is Legal Mobilization for the Birds? Legal Opportunity Structures and
Environmental Nongovernmental Organizations in the United Kingdom, France,
Finland, and Italy. Comparative Political Studies, 51(3), 380–412.
Vermeylen, S. (2017). Materiality and the Ontological Turn in the Anthropocene: Establishing a Dialogue Between Law, Anthropology and Eco-philosophy. In L. Kotzé
(Ed.), Law and Governance for the Anthropocene. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Viveiros de Castro, E. (2004). Perspectival Anthropology and the Method of Controlled
Equivocation. Tipití: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America,
2(1), 3–22.
Giorgi, A. (2018). Religioni di Minoranza tra Europa e Laicità Locale. Milano: Mimesis
Edizioni.
Jonas, H., Bavikatte, K., and Shrumm, H. (2010). Community Protocols and Access and
Benefit Sharing. Asian Biotechnology and Development Review, 12(3), 49–77.
Marchegiani, P., Hoglund Hellgren, J., and Gomez, L. (2018). Lithium Extraction in Argentina: a Case Study on its Social and Environmental Impacts. Buenos Aires: Fundacion
Ambiente y Recursos Naturales (FARN).
Marchegiani, P., Morgera, E., and Parks, L. (2020). Indigenous Peoples’ Rights to Natural Resources in Argentina: The Challenges of Impact Assessment, Consent and Fair
and Equitable Benefit-Sharing in Cases of Lithium Mining. The International Journal of
Human Rights, 24(2–3), 224–240.
McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., and Tilly, C. (2001). Dynamics of Contention. Leiden: Cambridge University Press.
Meyer, D. S. (2004). Protest and Political Opportunities. Annual Review of Sociology, 30,
124–145.
Morgera, E., Tsioumani, E., and Buck, M. (2014). Unraveling the Nagoya Protocol. Leiden:
Brill | Nijhoff.
Nelson, F. (2010). Democratizing Natural Resource Governance: Searching for Institutional Change. In F. Nelson (Ed.), Community Rights, Conservation and Contested Land:
The Politics of Natural Resource Governance in Africa. London: Earthscan, 310–333.
Parks, L. (2020). Benefit-Sharing in Environmental Governance Local Experiences of a Global
Concept. Abingdon: Routledge.
della Porta, D., and Diani, M. (2005). Social Movements: An Introduction. Second ed.
Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
de Sousa Santos, B. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide. London:
Paradigm Publishers.
Tarrow, S. (1998). Power in Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tobin, B. (2013). Bridging the Nagoya Compliance Gap: The Fundamental Role of Customary Law in Protection of Indigenous Peoples’ Resource and Knowledge Rights.
Law, Environment and Development Journal, 9(13), 142–162.
Uggla, Y. (2010). What Is this Thing called ‘natural’? The Nature-Culture Divide in
Climate Change and Biodiversity Policy. Journal of Political Ecology, 17(1), 79–91.
Vanhala, L. (2018). Is Legal Mobilization for the Birds? Legal Opportunity Structures and
Environmental Nongovernmental Organizations in the United Kingdom, France,
Finland, and Italy. Comparative Political Studies, 51(3), 380–412.
Vermeylen, S. (2017). Materiality and the Ontological Turn in the Anthropocene: Establishing a Dialogue Between Law, Anthropology and Eco-philosophy. In L. Kotzé
(Ed.), Law and Governance for the Anthropocene. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Viveiros de Castro, E. (2004). Perspectival Anthropology and the Method of Controlled
Equivocation. Tipití: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America,
2(1), 3–22.