12
Xenopus
Mertz, J.E., and J.B. Gurdon. 1977. Purifed DNAs are transcribed
after microinjection into Xenopus oocytes. Proc Natl Acad
Sci U S A. 74:1502–1506.
Miller, J.R., E.M. Cartwright, G.G. Brownlee, N.V. Fedoroff, and
D.D. Brown. 1978. The nucleotide sequence of oocyte 5S DNA
in Xenopus laevis. II: The GC-rich region. Cell. 13:717–725.
Miyamoto, K., M. Teperek, K. Yusa, G.E. Allen, C.R. Bradshaw,
and J. Gurdon. 2013. Nuclear Wave1 is required for reprogramming transcription in oocytes and for normal development. Science. 341:1002–1005.
Moody, S.A. 1987. Fates of the blastomeres of the 32-cell-stage
Xenopus embryo. Dev Biol. 122:300–319.
Müller, P., K.W. Rogers, R.Y. Shuizi, M. Brand, and A.F. Schier.
2013. Morphogen transport. Development. 140:1621–1638.
Nakamura, O., and K. Kishiyama. 1971. Prospective fates of blastomeres at the 32 cell stage of Xenopus laevis embryos.
Proceedings of the Japan Academy. 47:407–412.
Nakamura, O., H. Takasaki, and T. Mizohata. 1970. Differentiation
during cleavage in Xenopus laevis. I: Acquisition of selfdifferentiation capacity of the dorsal marginal zone. Proceedings of the Japan Academy. 46:694–699.
Nakamura, O., H. Takasaki, T. Okumoto, and H. Iida. 1971.
Differentiation during cleavage in Xenopus laevis. II: Development of inductive activity of the organizer. Proceedings of the
Japan Academy. 47:203–208.
Nakamura, O., and K. Yamada. 1971. Differences in the f ne
structure and chemical constitution of nucleolar bodies and
the true nucleolus in Xenopus laevis embryos. Development,
Growth & Differentiation. 13:303–322.
Nieuwkoop, P.D., and J. Faber. 1956. Normal table of Xenopus laevis
(Daudin). North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.
Nieuwkoop, P.D., and J. Faber. 1994. Normal table of Xenopus
laevis (Daudin): A systematical and chronological survey of
the development from the fertilized egg till the end of metamorphosis. Garland Pub, New York.
Nieuwkoop, P.D., and J.C. Van De Kamer. 1946. Xenopus laevis
as experimental object. In Experimental embryology in the
Netherlans, 1940–1945. Vol. 10. M.W. Woerdeman and C.P.
Raven, editors. Elsevier, Amsterdam. 115–118.
Okada, T.S. 1994. Experimental embryology in Japan, 1930–
1960: A historical background of developmental biology in
Japan. The International Journal of Developmental Biology.
38:135–154.
Piccolino, M. 1997. Luigi Galvani and animal electricity: Two centuries after the foundation of electrophysiology. Trends in
Neurosciences. 20:443–448.
Rauber, A. 1886. Personaltheil und germinaltheil des individuum.
Zool. Anz. 9:166–171.
Roeder, R.G. 1974. Multiple forms of deoxyribonucleic aciddependent ribonucleic acid polymerase in Xenopus laevis:
Levels of activity during oocyte and embryonic development.
J Biol Chem. 249:249–256.
Roeder, R.G. 2019. 50+ years of eukaryotic transcription: An
expanding universe of factors and mechanisms. Nat Struct
Mol Biol. 26:783–791.
Rosa, F., A.B. Roberts, D. Danielpour, L.L. Dart, M.B. Sporn, and
I.B. Dawid. 1988. Mesoderm induction in amphibians: The
role of TGF-beta 2-like factors. Science. 239:783–785.
Sakonju, S., D.D. Brown, D. Engelke, S.Y. Ng, B.S. Shastry,
and R.G. Roeder. 1981. The binding of a transcription factor to deletion mutants of a 5S ribosomal RNA gene. Cell.
23:665–669.
Sarkar, S. 1996. Lancelot Hogben, 1895–1975. Genetics. 142:655.
Shapiro, H., and H. Zwarenstein. 1934. A rapid test for pregnancy
on Xenopus laevis. Nature. 133:762–762.
Slack, J.M.W. 1999. Egg and ego: An almost true story of life in the
biology lab. Springer Science & Business Media, New York.
Slack, J.M.W. 2002. Conrad Hal Waddington: The last Renaissance
biologist? Nat Rev Genet. 3:889–895.
Takasaki, H. 1987. Fates and roles of the presumptive organizer
region in the 32-cell embryo in normal development of
Xenopus laevis. Development, Growth & Differentiation.
29:141–152.
van der Hoeven, J. 1858. Handbook of zoology. Longman, Brown,
Green, Longmans and Roberts, London.
Van Sittert, L., and G.J. Measey. 2016. Historical perspectives on
global exports and research of African clawed frogs ( Xenopus
laevis). Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa.
71:157–166.
Waddington, C., and E.M. Deuchar. 1953. Studies on the
mechanism of meristic segmentation. I: The dimensions of
somites. Development. 1:349–356.
Wagler, J.G. 1827. Footnote to Letter from H. Boie. Isis. 20:726.
Wagler, J.G. 1830. Natürliches System der Amphibien: mit
vorangehender Classifcation der Säugethiere und Vögel:
ein Beitrag zur vergleichenden Zoologie. J.G. Cotta’schen
Buchhandlung, Munich.
Wallace, H., and M.L. Birnstiel. 1966. Ribosomal cistrons and the
nucleolar organizer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 114:296–310.
Wargon, S. 2005. Legacy of Enid Charles, 1894–1972. Canadian
Studies in Population [ARCHIVES]:137–153.
Wellmann, J. 2017. The form of becoming: Embryology and the
epistemology of rhythm, 1760–1830. MIT Press, Cambridge,
MA.
West, J.B. 2013. Marcello Malpighi and the discovery of the pulmonary capillaries and alveoli. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol
Physiol. 304:L383–390.
Yamada, M., J. Byrne, and D. Egli. 2015. From cloned frogs to
patient matched stem cells: Induced pluripotency or somatic
cell nuclear transfer? Current Opinion in Genetics &
Development. 34:29–34.
Yamanaka, S., and H.M. Blau. 2010. Nuclear reprogramming to a
pluripotent state by three approaches. Nature. 465:704–712.
Yisraeli, J.K., S. Sokol, and D.A. Melton. 1990. A two-step model
for the localization of maternal mRNA in Xenopus oocytes:
Involvement of microtubules and microflaments in the
translocation and anchoring of Vg1 mRNA. Development.
108:289–298.
Yong, E. 2017. How a frog became the frst mainstream pregnancy test.
The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/
2017/05/how-a-frog-became-the-f rst-mainstream-pregnancytest/525285/
Zahn, N., M. Levin, and D.S. Adams. 2017. The Zahn drawings:
New illustrations of Xenopus embryo and tadpole stages
for studies of craniofacial development. Development. 144:
2708–2713.
Xenopus
Mertz, J.E., and J.B. Gurdon. 1977. Purifed DNAs are transcribed
after microinjection into Xenopus oocytes. Proc Natl Acad
Sci U S A. 74:1502–1506.
Miller, J.R., E.M. Cartwright, G.G. Brownlee, N.V. Fedoroff, and
D.D. Brown. 1978. The nucleotide sequence of oocyte 5S DNA
in Xenopus laevis. II: The GC-rich region. Cell. 13:717–725.
Miyamoto, K., M. Teperek, K. Yusa, G.E. Allen, C.R. Bradshaw,
and J. Gurdon. 2013. Nuclear Wave1 is required for reprogramming transcription in oocytes and for normal development. Science. 341:1002–1005.
Moody, S.A. 1987. Fates of the blastomeres of the 32-cell-stage
Xenopus embryo. Dev Biol. 122:300–319.
Müller, P., K.W. Rogers, R.Y. Shuizi, M. Brand, and A.F. Schier.
2013. Morphogen transport. Development. 140:1621–1638.
Nakamura, O., and K. Kishiyama. 1971. Prospective fates of blastomeres at the 32 cell stage of Xenopus laevis embryos.
Proceedings of the Japan Academy. 47:407–412.
Nakamura, O., H. Takasaki, and T. Mizohata. 1970. Differentiation
during cleavage in Xenopus laevis. I: Acquisition of selfdifferentiation capacity of the dorsal marginal zone. Proceedings of the Japan Academy. 46:694–699.
Nakamura, O., H. Takasaki, T. Okumoto, and H. Iida. 1971.
Differentiation during cleavage in Xenopus laevis. II: Development of inductive activity of the organizer. Proceedings of the
Japan Academy. 47:203–208.
Nakamura, O., and K. Yamada. 1971. Differences in the f ne
structure and chemical constitution of nucleolar bodies and
the true nucleolus in Xenopus laevis embryos. Development,
Growth & Differentiation. 13:303–322.
Nieuwkoop, P.D., and J. Faber. 1956. Normal table of Xenopus laevis
(Daudin). North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.
Nieuwkoop, P.D., and J. Faber. 1994. Normal table of Xenopus
laevis (Daudin): A systematical and chronological survey of
the development from the fertilized egg till the end of metamorphosis. Garland Pub, New York.
Nieuwkoop, P.D., and J.C. Van De Kamer. 1946. Xenopus laevis
as experimental object. In Experimental embryology in the
Netherlans, 1940–1945. Vol. 10. M.W. Woerdeman and C.P.
Raven, editors. Elsevier, Amsterdam. 115–118.
Okada, T.S. 1994. Experimental embryology in Japan, 1930–
1960: A historical background of developmental biology in
Japan. The International Journal of Developmental Biology.
38:135–154.
Piccolino, M. 1997. Luigi Galvani and animal electricity: Two centuries after the foundation of electrophysiology. Trends in
Neurosciences. 20:443–448.
Rauber, A. 1886. Personaltheil und germinaltheil des individuum.
Zool. Anz. 9:166–171.
Roeder, R.G. 1974. Multiple forms of deoxyribonucleic aciddependent ribonucleic acid polymerase in Xenopus laevis:
Levels of activity during oocyte and embryonic development.
J Biol Chem. 249:249–256.
Roeder, R.G. 2019. 50+ years of eukaryotic transcription: An
expanding universe of factors and mechanisms. Nat Struct
Mol Biol. 26:783–791.
Rosa, F., A.B. Roberts, D. Danielpour, L.L. Dart, M.B. Sporn, and
I.B. Dawid. 1988. Mesoderm induction in amphibians: The
role of TGF-beta 2-like factors. Science. 239:783–785.
Sakonju, S., D.D. Brown, D. Engelke, S.Y. Ng, B.S. Shastry,
and R.G. Roeder. 1981. The binding of a transcription factor to deletion mutants of a 5S ribosomal RNA gene. Cell.
23:665–669.
Sarkar, S. 1996. Lancelot Hogben, 1895–1975. Genetics. 142:655.
Shapiro, H., and H. Zwarenstein. 1934. A rapid test for pregnancy
on Xenopus laevis. Nature. 133:762–762.
Slack, J.M.W. 1999. Egg and ego: An almost true story of life in the
biology lab. Springer Science & Business Media, New York.
Slack, J.M.W. 2002. Conrad Hal Waddington: The last Renaissance
biologist? Nat Rev Genet. 3:889–895.
Takasaki, H. 1987. Fates and roles of the presumptive organizer
region in the 32-cell embryo in normal development of
Xenopus laevis. Development, Growth & Differentiation.
29:141–152.
van der Hoeven, J. 1858. Handbook of zoology. Longman, Brown,
Green, Longmans and Roberts, London.
Van Sittert, L., and G.J. Measey. 2016. Historical perspectives on
global exports and research of African clawed frogs ( Xenopus
laevis). Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa.
71:157–166.
Waddington, C., and E.M. Deuchar. 1953. Studies on the
mechanism of meristic segmentation. I: The dimensions of
somites. Development. 1:349–356.
Wagler, J.G. 1827. Footnote to Letter from H. Boie. Isis. 20:726.
Wagler, J.G. 1830. Natürliches System der Amphibien: mit
vorangehender Classifcation der Säugethiere und Vögel:
ein Beitrag zur vergleichenden Zoologie. J.G. Cotta’schen
Buchhandlung, Munich.
Wallace, H., and M.L. Birnstiel. 1966. Ribosomal cistrons and the
nucleolar organizer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 114:296–310.
Wargon, S. 2005. Legacy of Enid Charles, 1894–1972. Canadian
Studies in Population [ARCHIVES]:137–153.
Wellmann, J. 2017. The form of becoming: Embryology and the
epistemology of rhythm, 1760–1830. MIT Press, Cambridge,
MA.
West, J.B. 2013. Marcello Malpighi and the discovery of the pulmonary capillaries and alveoli. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol
Physiol. 304:L383–390.
Yamada, M., J. Byrne, and D. Egli. 2015. From cloned frogs to
patient matched stem cells: Induced pluripotency or somatic
cell nuclear transfer? Current Opinion in Genetics &
Development. 34:29–34.
Yamanaka, S., and H.M. Blau. 2010. Nuclear reprogramming to a
pluripotent state by three approaches. Nature. 465:704–712.
Yisraeli, J.K., S. Sokol, and D.A. Melton. 1990. A two-step model
for the localization of maternal mRNA in Xenopus oocytes:
Involvement of microtubules and microflaments in the
translocation and anchoring of Vg1 mRNA. Development.
108:289–298.
Yong, E. 2017. How a frog became the frst mainstream pregnancy test.
The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/
2017/05/how-a-frog-became-the-f rst-mainstream-pregnancytest/525285/
Zahn, N., M. Levin, and D.S. Adams. 2017. The Zahn drawings:
New illustrations of Xenopus embryo and tadpole stages
for studies of craniofacial development. Development. 144:
2708–2713.